Results 226 to 250 of 448
Thread: 2016 Lange XT Freetour
-
03-14-2017, 10:00 PM #226
I mean i really didnt argue. I needed new heels which they quickly sent me.
-
03-14-2017, 10:01 PM #227
Ive seen other people rocking horseshoes too. Usually from jesters/griffons
-
03-14-2017, 11:21 PM #228Galibier Designcrafting technology in service of music
-
03-14-2017, 11:25 PM #229
I get that as a temp fix. But I feel like they should fix the plastic mix and send you a pair that doesn't warp like play-doh. Are we beta testing Lange now?
Toured in mine but haven't put them in alpine binders yet. Have a feeling I'm going to be sorely disappointed if I do.
I thought this was supposed to be the one boot to rule them all.
Glad I hung on to my RX130s.Last edited by reckless toboggan; 03-15-2017 at 12:08 AM.
-
03-15-2017, 08:03 AM #230
-
03-15-2017, 08:58 AM #231
Last edited by reckless toboggan; 03-15-2017 at 09:25 AM.
-
03-15-2017, 12:14 PM #232
For what it's worth it's not the softness. It's the density. It's PA plastic (grilamid in this case) you will get the same issues if you repeatedly use a Tecnica ZeroG or Dynafit Vulcan in a standard alpine binding repeatedly. Well they came up with a fix for it, which is simple, solves the issue and allows people to keep skiing. Would you prefer they have folks send their boots in a wait several months for a warenty pair? Lange is out of these boots.
My guess is they will have a more elegant solution by mid fall or the following year when they release an updated Freetour with dual core molding.
-
03-15-2017, 01:19 PM #233Rod9301
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Squaw valley
- Posts
- 4,673
-
03-15-2017, 01:22 PM #234
-
03-16-2017, 06:55 AM #235Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Posts
- 125
I'm surprised they only sent you heel spurs and didn't offer to replace. Mine are getting swapped out at the end of the season.
On my pair I experienced some deforming around the toe inserts when using tech bindings but nothing that impacted the boots ability to function.
I'm not disappointed at all. Lange customer service was awesome and did the right thing- can't complain about that.
-
03-16-2017, 12:09 PM #236
-
03-24-2017, 03:46 PM #237Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 21
-
05-02-2017, 10:02 PM #238Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Almost Mountains
- Posts
- 1,897
With my coaching season over and no lifts turning locally (well, until summer camps), I've had time recently to do a fair bit more skinning in my Freetours. I'm still loving the ROM and skiing, but the lace-up system on the liners tends to loosen on my during skinning. Combined with what seems to be a little bit of packing out on the liners, I've got more foot movement within the liner while skinning than I'd like. Anyone else experiencing this?
(yes, the simple answer is probably "tie the damn laces above the useless plastic thingy, you JONG", but I have to admit that I'm kinda missing the Factor's BOA closure right now).
Also, I'm around 115 days on mine, and the wear on the shells isn't bad. The liners, on the other hand, are starting to wear out at the back of the heel (probably because I pull them every night). Annoying—I'd hope to get more than one season out of liners—but given that most people neither pull 'em every night nor ski 100+ days/year, I'm not too annoyed by it yet.
-
05-03-2017, 11:19 AM #239Rod9301
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Squaw valley
- Posts
- 4,673
-
05-03-2017, 03:09 PM #240Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- SW CO
- Posts
- 5,600
"Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers
photos
-
05-03-2017, 10:09 PM #241Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Posts
- 3,342
If I kill another pair of RS140s, I was thinking about trying the inbound Zipfits in my freetours for inbounds and touring liner for touring. I saw Zipfit now has a touring liner, but haven't heard anything bad or good about it.
Does anyone have experience with getting Zipfits to work with the Freetours?
-
05-04-2017, 12:14 AM #242Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Almost Mountains
- Posts
- 1,897
The throat is tighter; getting my foot around the pivot point definitely requires opening the boot with both hands rather than just shoving my foot and liner in (yes, I put the liners on first). On cold days, I try to keep the shells in the warmer portion of the truck because putting them on when they're truly cold is a bitch.
I've got the "normal", not the LV, Freetour, and they're definitely roomier in general than the same-size Factor—I'm wearing actual ski socks, not liners, for the first time in I don't know how many years (I skied a 26.5 in Adrenalins, then Factors, and both of those boots I wore just liner socks; the Adrenalins were punched, the Factors weren't). As noted, getting my foot around the corner into and out of the boot is more challenging, but they're otherwise more comfortable than any boot I can remember.
No comparison in skiing. The Langes ski like a real ski boot rather than like a pretty decent AT boot; the flex may not be stiffer, exactly, but it's definitely more progressive with less chance of bottoming out (the latter has only happened to me a handful of times when I've been forward on the skis in spring conditions and hit something like a rut). I had mostly convinced myself to get a pair of true touring boots and a pair of race boots this year after many years with a one-boot compromise on my feet, and the Langes convinced me I didn't need to do that.
-
05-04-2017, 06:37 AM #243
I ski the RS140 & Freetour as well and have Zips for both. I intended to use the same liner for both boots, but find the Freetour just a bit lower volume than the RS, and my original zips were getting kind of old (6-7 seasons) so I bought another pair. I have probably 2 tubes of extra cork in my original Zips used in the RS, but have the stock amount in the Zips for the Freetours. Both liners are WC models, but different vintages.
Walk mode is obviously a little more restricted with the zips, but the Freetour isn't stellar compared to say a Vulcan to begin with any way. They obviously ski a shit-ton better with the Zips, but the liner doesn't make up for the lack of rearward cuff 'beef'. Bottom line is they ski really well but aren't going to be a true touring set up, but then again it's not that kind of boot to begin with.Who cares how the crow flies
-
05-04-2017, 09:14 AM #244
-
05-04-2017, 11:30 AM #245Rod9301
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Squaw valley
- Posts
- 4,673
-
05-04-2017, 12:03 PM #246Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Almost Mountains
- Posts
- 1,897
OT except for comparison, but my Factors have way, way more than 100 days on them and the original liners are still in decent shape (which surprised me). I've killed three sets of sole blocks, one set of walk-mode switches, and a couple of buckles, but the liners are neither packed out nor excessively worn on the outside, despite the same take-em-out every night routine. I think I put something like 10 years on those boots, and while my average day count over that time is probably closer to 75 or 80 than 100, that's still a lot of mileage on the original liners.
-
05-04-2017, 12:07 PM #247Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Almost Mountains
- Posts
- 1,897
I didn't notice any lack of rearward support, and I spend plenty of time using the tails of my skis. The power transmission fore and aft is pretty damn good, IMO, and felt just fine while driving race skis, even from the back seat.
They are a relatively upright stance, as discussed elsewhere in the thread, and I like that; some people don't. They only time they don't have good rearward support in my experience is in walk mode, and I do find that to be a bit more of a problem than with some other boots—the walk mode on these is only really free-floating if you have the cuff buckles on the climbing bales and the power straps loosened. If you tighten up the buckles but forget to flip the switch or somehow get it back in walk mode (or the mechanism doesn't lock in properly after switching it), you get a lack of rearward support that makes skiing...interesting...without the immediate "ah, f&@$, I'm in walk mode" response that I've had when doing so in other boots.
-
05-04-2017, 01:16 PM #248
I guess it depends on a lot of variables like your weight, strength, speed, snow, etc.. but for me YES, they are 'spineless' compared to a race boot, but no worse than any other AT boot, and certainly not bad or an issue in most snow conditions they belong in.
Still, it's unnerving when 'forget' you're not in a race boot and go to power off the rear of the boot and you get that feeling like you just tipped too far back in a chair. On the other hand it's a good exercise for staying balanced in SL gates ...Who cares how the crow flies
-
05-09-2017, 08:56 AM #249
What about the new V-lock 2.0
Is it that much better than the original?
The Ski/Hike System 2.0 features Lange's Power V-Lock technology, which consists of a metal-on-metal lock
-
05-09-2017, 09:21 AM #250Rod9301
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Squaw valley
- Posts
- 4,673
Bookmarks