Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 247
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,356

    Tele bindings that aren't crap

    I know, I know... all tele is crap... but for those of you on a tele rig, what bindings do I get that will drive, and last more than a season?

    In the past 3 seasons I've broken 2 HH heel loops, 1 HH toe box, 1 BD 01 toe box, and ripped out 2 pair of Targas. I'm now ski-less due to two binding fails in the last week. I definitely need a 6-hole mount pattern but even that hasn't solved the issue, as my exploded 01 proved yesterday.

    Are Axls/Vices really an improvement over HammerHeads? Is the Axl's tour mode equivalent to the BD 01, and is the tour mode worth another $100 over the non-tour Vice? Or is the Bishop v2 worth the $500 price tag?

    Thanks for any advice. I'm currently on Scarpa T-Race and primary skis are Gotamas and Squad 7s. Solomon GS skis occasionally as well.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,058

    Tele bindings that aren't crap

    http://bishopbindings.com
    Expensive but worth it. Best in-area rig in terms of control, power, dial-ability, and sturdiness and most parts are easily replaceable when they get worn down. I have broken several pairs but the new models have addressed weaknesses in the power tubes.

    Not so great for touring, though not terrible.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    They still make tele gear? Well I'll be damned!
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    kinda halfway twixt NH & CO
    Posts
    1,419
    there will always be a subset of alpine skiers who for one reason or another choose to embrace the challenging anachronism that is free heel. It is fun, more work and can make one a better alpine skier, moreover it is a friendly elitist sub culture not a smug one. If I wasn't so old and decrepit I'd do it more

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    between campus and church
    Posts
    9,963
    What condition are your bindings when they explode? HH and 01s have pretty low rates of toe box failure.

    When I was on 75mm I always like Voile switchbacks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,984
    Learn to be less of a hack!

    Also, pull out can also be a function of misadjusted bindings.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Bend
    Posts
    1,365
    The Axl is definitely an upgrade from the HH if you tour. Heavier than the BD free pivot, but burlier too.

    Back when HH was the standard for lift access skiing, I don't recall a lot of reports of failures. If they're the little spring activated heels, then sure, depending on the mount and care, I could see them being some what fragile, but the toe box? The Vice is just to keep the parts redundant between a tour / no tour binding.

    Sounds like the Bomber may be your binding. Big guys with aggressive technique have always had a tough time ripping screws using tele bindings. All you can do is mount 'em solid and ski a bit more conservatively. No way around the fact that you're transferring more force onto fewer screws.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,356
    Here's my exploded 01 toe box from yesterday. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTGR Forums1452455226.675105.jpg 
Views:	624 
Size:	329.0 KB 
ID:	174758

    Sounds like I need Bishops. Just can't afford them at the $495 price tag.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    364

    Tele bindings that aren't crap

    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    Here's my exploded 01 toe box from yesterday. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTGR Forums1452455226.675105.jpg 
Views:	624 
Size:	329.0 KB 
ID:	174758

    Sounds like I need Bishops. Just can't afford them at the $495 price tag.
    Buy my used set for $250 plus ship & PayPal. Skis free or I can pull the bindings for you.



    Bomber bishops first gen $250. Skis free or I can ship just bindings. Salomon ak rocket 195 with the tails partially chopped.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTGR Forums1452465578.687004.jpg 
Views:	471 
Size:	771.6 KB 
ID:	174767

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,821
    Quote Originally Posted by charlesj View Post
    there will always be a subset of alpine skiers who for one reason or another choose to embrace the challenging anachronism that is free heel. It is fun, more work and can make one a better alpine skier, moreover it is a friendly elitist sub culture not a smug one. If I wasn't so old and decrepit I'd do it more
    That, and chicks dig it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tri-Ungulate View Post
    http://bishopbindings.com
    Expensive but worth it. Best in-area rig in terms of control, power, dial-ability, and sturdiness and most parts are easily replaceable when they get worn down. I have broken several pairs but the new models have addressed weaknesses in the power tubes.

    Not so great for touring, though not terrible.
    ^^^This.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    between campus and church
    Posts
    9,963
    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    Here's my exploded 01 toe box from yesterday. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTGR Forums1452455226.675105.jpg 
Views:	624 
Size:	329.0 KB 
ID:	174758

    Sounds like I need Bishops. Just can't afford them at the $495 price tag.
    By chance, do you run your springs with a lot of pre-load? That looks like you bottomed out and the forward pressure tore the binding apart. Maybe try with less spring tension in the future.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    7800'
    Posts
    243
    Quote Originally Posted by Tri-Ungulate View Post
    http://bishopbindings.com
    Expensive but worth it. Best in-area rig in terms of control, power, dial-ability, and sturdiness and most parts are easily replaceable when they get worn down. I have broken several pairs but the new models have addressed weaknesses in the power tubes.

    Not so great for touring, though not terrible.
    Demoed these today at Loveland. They look quite unlikely to break, construction appears top notch. They skied well, but I can't offer a detailed review - only did a couple runs, and my flimsy boots (and legs) had trouble with the beefy skis I chose.

    Thanks to montanaskier for the hook up. Cool brand.
    a witty saying proves nothing
    voltaire

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,058

    Tele bindings that aren't crap

    ski-wpk, if you don't jump on kneedropper's offer I'm tempted to get em myself, and I have 3 sets of Bishops already. They look to be in great shape. I prolly won't because you only really only need one pair with the switch plates, but still. I've competed (and podiumed) on the Tele Freeskiing tour with my Bishops and will swear by them. I also ski on Voiles and Rotte NTN, (as well as have skied on Hammerheads and O1s in the past) but for your needs the Bishop sounds like the ticket.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by Peruvian View Post
    By chance, do you run your springs with a lot of pre-load? That looks like you bottomed out and the forward pressure tore the binding apart. Maybe try with less spring tension in the future.
    Not a lot of preload actually. Flipping up the heel bail on the 01s is always kind of scary because they don't 'snap' with any authority. I always think they won't stay on but I've never come out of them (until yesterday).

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by kneedropper View Post
    Buy my used set for $250 plus ship & PayPal. Skis free or I can pull the bindings for you.



    Bomber bishops first gen $250. Skis free or I can ship just bindings. Salomon ak rocket 195 with the tails partially chopped.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTGR Forums1452465578.687004.jpg 
Views:	471 
Size:	771.6 KB 
ID:	174767
    How different are v2s than the original?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    in a suite of vigorous disturbances
    Posts
    2,280
    Fuck duckbills.

    NTN is where it's at.

    Sooooo superior.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,095
    Another vote for Bishops, or the Voile Switchback X2s if you plan to go touring.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,058
    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    How different are v2s than the original?
    As I mentioned earlier, vastly beefier power tubes, which in the v1s had the possibility of cracking. This has happened to me, usually in very cold weather after a few zillion cycles of hard use. Also v2 has a slightly beefier pivot, though that's unlikely to be a problem. When I have cracked the power tubes, Bishop has replaced them, and though they do charge for the replacements, I considered it fair, especially since all the pairs I broke were from bindings I bought used. If you buy them new, I'm pretty sure they have an excellent warrantee.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    5,963

    Tele bindings that aren't crap

    Axls and Vices are pretty bomber; I've destroyed a shitload of Hammerheads, but only one Axl, and that was the first year prototype. But then I switched to NTN, and have had no problems at all.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,722
    I have some AXL I'm not using if you want to pick some up lmk.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    795
    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    Not a lot of preload actually. Flipping up the heel bail on the 01s is always kind of scary because they don't 'snap' with any authority. I always think they won't stay on but I've never come out of them (until yesterday).
    Well, at least the release function works.
    That's actually the tertiary release on an O1- cables being primary and screws ripping being secondary.

    Haven't skied Bombers, but if I was looking for the closest thing to unbreakable, that would be my first choice. Universally well regarded as durable and precise.

    As far as touring- I have Axls, 01's (4 hole) and SBs, (v2).
    AXLs ski best (subjective), have the most reliable ski/tour switch, and are the most durable.

    I have been skinning/sidestepping up steep and hard where most others were booting with crampons and been very happy to have AXLs between me and my skis. Really reliable in and out of tour mode with the least chance of potential ice build up, and very secure when stomping an edge in.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Tech Tonics View Post
    Fuck duckbills.

    NTN is where it's at.

    Sooooo superior.
    I love me some NTN, I've got them on almost all my skis, but those Bombers are mo' bomber.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,722
    just switched to NTN, havent skied it yet. picking up my rig today. Pieced together with Scarpa TX comp and Freedoms from Hop, solid hookup, ridiculously fast ship, and some Kastle from Rusty Groomer.

    After wearing those boots in the house, and then skinning half of my local hill in T-1's and AXL's saturday, I'm looking forward to the weight savings, and being older (51), having a repaired ACL, and skiing out west more every year at higher elevations (I hate to admit this) bending down to attach leashes and click in getting painful, cant wait to step-in.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,356
    NTN may be my long term option but for now, BD is shipping a replacement 01 (<24 HR resolution - thanks BD!) and I picked up some Vices to try on a second pair. Definitely Bishops on the next setup. Just can't afford them (new or used) right now.

    Thanks all for the feedback. I'll post to this thread when I break the Vices. : )

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by hhtele View Post
    Well, at least the release function works.
    That's actually the tertiary release on an O1- cables being primary and screws ripping being secondary.

    Haven't skied Bombers, but if I was looking for the closest thing to unbreakable, that would be my first choice. Universally well regarded as durable and precise.

    As far as touring- I have Axls, 01's (4 hole) and SBs, (v2).
    AXLs ski best (subjective), have the most reliable ski/tour switch, and are the most durable.

    I have been skinning/sidestepping up steep and hard where most others were booting with crampons and been very happy to have AXLs between me and my skis. Really reliable in and out of tour mode with the least chance of potential ice build up, and very secure when stomping an edge in.
    I went with Vice over Axl. Disappointed to not have tour mode but figured that was just another potential failure point. Hopefully fewer parts equals less breakage.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •