Results 51 to 60 of 60
Thread: Invictus 95 TI vs Enforcer
-
10-19-2017, 09:07 AM #51Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Posts
- 725
-
10-19-2017, 09:14 AM #52
You didn’t like the ski, no one fucking cares. Least of all Nordica who’s gonna sell out of them by December, AGAIN. The ski didn’t work for you. Sweet bro, we got it. Many more people have found it to be an outstanding option for them.
Target weight? According to whom? God forbid there be a variaty of options for people, outside of your standards..
-
10-19-2017, 09:28 AM #53
isn't the newer enforcer a "women-specific" ski?
-
10-19-2017, 09:29 AM #54Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Gaperville, CO
- Posts
- 5,852
-
10-19-2017, 09:30 AM #55Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Posts
- 725
-
10-19-2017, 12:05 PM #56
-
10-19-2017, 01:40 PM #57
I have a pair of Enforcer 100's. They are deserving of the hype. Just a tad less high-end performance of say a Cochise or Q-Lab but much easier to manage everywhere else. Certainly not for a skier who would love a Head Monster 98 or 108. That being said, I dropped some demo bindings on mine and loaned them out to a friend who is a solid skier, but has never skied with skis this wide or with rocker. He has never skied better and loved them. He called them magic skis. Thumb your nose at them all you want. The people buying Enforcer 100's and 93's at near MSRP give me hope that our sport isn't quite dead yet.
In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...
-
10-19-2017, 02:36 PM #58Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Posts
- 725
-
10-20-2017, 08:34 PM #59Banned
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- where the rough and fluff live
- Posts
- 4,147
This thread is one hell of an onion.
-
10-22-2017, 02:10 AM #60
Yeah.....
Anyhow, will mount @-1 and report back when the season starts
Bookmarks