Results 26 to 50 of 79
Thread: Did humans create cows?
-
12-01-2015, 09:20 AM #26Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
-
12-01-2015, 09:23 AM #27Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
-
12-01-2015, 09:58 AM #28features a sintered base
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Impossible to knowl--I use an iPhone
- Posts
- 13,150
Wow. Free steak.
[quote][//quote]
-
12-01-2015, 10:16 AM #29
All I know is 'hunting cattle' sounds like it should be a euphemism for something.
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
"We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats
"I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso
Cisco and his wife are fragile idiots who breed morons.
-
12-01-2015, 10:19 AM #30
There are still some sub-genuses of wild cattle - the Gaur and the Wild Yak, eg. Bison are also members of the Bos genus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bos
-
12-01-2015, 10:23 AM #31Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
oh wait, that's not right
-
12-01-2015, 10:24 AM #32
-
12-01-2015, 10:27 AM #33
-
12-01-2015, 10:27 AM #34
Oh, and while humans did eat early dogs, and use them as pack animals, remember, there were things like 9 foot tall (at the shoulder, on all fours) bears running around at sustained speeds of 40+mph, as well as all sorts of other nightmarish creatures. All of human civilization has flourished in the brief geologic blink of an eye after these creatures went extinct, and we did not really flourish until they did.
There is every reason to think that the combination of the alert nature of a wolf/primitive dog, and human's ability to use projectiles such as spears or even rocks, and both species ability to work as a pack for common goals, was THE thing that kept humans safe from the monsters that roamed free only a moment ago. That, and living together in numbers. Also, human populations seem to have taken off a bit while these megafaunal creatures were still running around, food was plentiful of course, but humans didn't start developing technology and really advancing until after most of these creatures died out naturally. It was cooperation with canines that gave us the edge and safety needed to start the larger tribes and settlements that were the genesis for civilization.__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
"We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats
"I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso
Cisco and his wife are fragile idiots who breed morons.
-
12-01-2015, 10:34 AM #35Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
This must have happened around the time that the mutation that allowed adult humans to digest milk... this mutation was then obviously selected for as milk drinkers were healthier and stronger and better suited to survive famine and drought with the additional source of nutrition/hydration. No matter what vegans want you to believe, the milk drinkers then had more sex/babies than the non milk drinkers... so maybe cows made humans?
-
12-01-2015, 10:39 AM #36
-
12-01-2015, 10:46 AM #37
Yes, but only when the term "cattle" is used to describe the genus that includes wild ox, gaur, wild yak, etc., But the term "cow" in common everyday usage -- which is the subject of this thread -- refers a single species: cattle aka Bos taurus. That is, when OP asks "did humans create cows?," OP refers to a single species, cattle aka Bos taurus, and not to all species in the Bos genus. Kinda like talking about jaguars, pumas, bobcat, tigers, lions, etc. -- all of which are of the genus Felis and are called "cats" -- in a thread re what cat food to feed your house cat.
-
12-01-2015, 11:04 AM #38
-
12-01-2015, 11:04 AM #39
There are already attempts underway to bring back the auroch.
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/24/how_...ate_an_auroch/
-
12-01-2015, 11:14 AM #40
-
12-01-2015, 11:42 AM #41
-
12-01-2015, 11:45 AM #42Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
Yeah Wiki central for sure.
-
12-01-2015, 11:46 AM #43Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
-
12-01-2015, 11:48 AM #44
-
12-01-2015, 12:06 PM #45Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
Didn't you take biology 101? Most mammals lose the ability to digest milk as an adult. Their tummies stop producing the enzyme required.
There us a gene in humans (a mutation) that makes people continue to have the enzyme through adulthood. This is why lactose intolerant people can take a pill and eat dairy. And why lactose intolerant is different from allergic.
I thought this was common knowledge. It's basic evolution.
-
12-01-2015, 12:35 PM #46
-
12-01-2015, 12:36 PM #47
i understand the concepts of evolution and selection. I also understand that the ability to digest milk in humans in more complex than the extent that a human gene is expressed. Perhaps this was not clearly discussed in biology 101. (my school education included bio 101)
The "basic evolution" becomes more complex when considering co-evolution of the human genome (or the genome of any mammal) and the microbial genome found in humans (and other mammals). Science-based understanding of the interplay between human (and other mammal) and mammalian microbe gene expressions and enzyme productions is in its infancy. Milk digestion of humans is one good example of where the science-based understanding is young. Also, throw into the mix, the microbial and lack of microbial found in milk and things become even less clear.
-
12-01-2015, 12:38 PM #48
I digest the fuck out of milk and, especially, cheese. So does my dog. Take that science!
-
12-01-2015, 01:27 PM #49
Neither one of you is going to shit for a whole week.
I see hydraulic turtles.
-
12-01-2015, 02:22 PM #50Hucked to flat once
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Idaho
- Posts
- 11,001
So wolves were hanging out with humans and we get dogs (same canus lupus) and we still have wolves living in the wild so they are considered wild. We have ox apparently hanging out with humans and they evolve into cows that some are released on an island and live in the wild and are considered feral (considered same species of bos taurus).
http://www.blm.gov/id/st/en/prog/wild_horses_.html
We have wild horses (equus caballus) that are feral (lives in the wild but descended from a domesticated animal) and are considered wild. There are also what are known as wild burros (equus asinus) which are called wild but probably are feral.
http://modernfarmer.com/2014/09/dang...cattle-hawaii/
The wild cows behave differently than domesticated cattle but are feral. Why do the horses and burros get to be wild? Why all the cow bigotry?
Bookmarks