Results 3,826 to 3,850 of 6779
-
04-20-2019, 02:26 PM #3826Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Posts
- 56
-
04-20-2019, 04:58 PM #3827Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- your vacation
- Posts
- 4,736
Appreciate the love. I was an actor in a life before I stalled out in breckenridge. I'm actually pretty conservative on tgr. In real life I'm a bigot and sexist and don't hold it in.
I did just text the nut job to see if she wanted to get together and watch dazed and confused. I just can't deal when she starts crying because I don't want any more for our on again off again to year thing.
-
04-20-2019, 06:13 PM #3828Funky But Chic
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- The Cone of Uncertainty
- Posts
- 49,306
Dazed and confused with a woman? There's playoff hockey on bro.
-
04-20-2019, 07:10 PM #3829
-
04-21-2019, 03:04 PM #3830Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Posts
- 56
I'm sure this has been covered in this thread, but I've been thinking a lot about it recently- what the hell is the point of marriage for the average or above average guy in today's society?
I avoided a massive shit show by not being married to my ex. I kept my house, my truck, my 401k, my dog, my IRA, my cash, etc. Had I been married I would have been writing her a check for hundreds of thousands of dollars and she would be entitled to alimony. I have yet to hear a coherent argument for why someone deserves alimony, especially if there are no kids in the mix. Also, I'm lucky I live in a state where common law marriage isn't a thing.
I'm 33. My net worth is about half a million dollars. I make $180k per year not including my deferred comp retention plan. Why would I willingly sign a piece of paper guaranteeing half of my future earnings and half of the increase in my assets going forward to another person unless said person had a comparable net worth and income?
Marriage is such a shit deal, I don't understand it at all.
-
04-21-2019, 03:09 PM #3831
if it works for you
-
04-21-2019, 03:10 PM #3832
-
04-21-2019, 03:50 PM #3833
-
04-21-2019, 09:14 PM #3834
-
04-21-2019, 10:29 PM #3835
-
04-22-2019, 06:35 AM #3836
-
04-22-2019, 07:16 AM #3837Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- your vacation
- Posts
- 4,736
-
04-22-2019, 08:50 AM #3838Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 1,021
In my jurisdiction if you were in a “marriage like” relationship for a specific period of time- you are treated the same on division of assets on the break down of the relationship.
Here she would have a year I think to make the claim. If it is the same there - may want to keep your distance but be nice.
Also, check to see what the laws are there- the
more you know eh!
-
04-22-2019, 08:55 AM #3839Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
-
04-22-2019, 09:36 AM #3840
Colorado does have common law marriage, that's true. But you can't get bamboozled into being common law married, the requirements are:
1) both parties are available to be married (ie not married to someone else, mentally competent, not a minor, etc)
2) both parties consider themselves married
3) both parties hold themselves out to the community as married
No amount of living together will meet these criteria without lots of other evidence demonstrating the marriage relationship. If one party always uses "girlfriend" and never calls her "wife" and all the friends view them as bf/gf, even if a fully committed couple, there will be no marriage found. The only circumstance I have seen where living together as a fully committed couple has been a big part of the marriage question is where one person dies and the other is trying to prove to Social Security that s/he was a common law spouse."fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
"She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
"everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy
-
04-22-2019, 10:08 AM #3841Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,033
Cuz survival of the species is everybody's business
but seriously ex what ?
Did you own any fee simple property together or was it a modern Marriage where each party made lots of money and kept things seperate, what were the financial arrangements, did you have joint acounts, was it your house your car her car her house or wtf ?
I had a buddy who contested (and won) in a 9 yr common law marriage with no kids based on the concept of the "modern marriage" buddy was a shrewd lawyer who paid for AND documented everything he spent in those 9 yrs from a 10 acre hobbyfarm to a pack of gum, she was also a professional who pissed away all her money, the judge found in favor of the modern marriage BUT it took 2 yrs and they each spent 100K+ in court costs
this was pre 97 BC law, it may have changed since, so like counselor said ... check your local lawsLee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
-
04-22-2019, 10:21 AM #3842
-
04-22-2019, 10:55 AM #3843Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Posts
- 56
Yep, everything was separate. We didn't have a single account together. I owned the house, my truck, etc in my name only. She owned her car. We both make decent money. I think the split without the government getting involved was equitable. I keep what I worked for. She keeps what she worked for.
Luckily I live in CO where that's not a concern. We never represented that we were married. Like Danno covered, our relationship would not meet the test for a common law marriage in my state.
Good news about CO- no common law marriage. Bad news about CO- ridiculous amounts of alimony for anyone who is married and gets divorced. Also, CO has lifetime alimony after 20 years.
Not only is the lower earning spouse financially incentivized to break up a marriage, but if they wait it out they get a monthly paycheck for life.
Yeah, but I'm not from the midwest.
Only if you have more earning potential and assets than I do. Then I can divorce you and take "my half".
Yeah, I guess so. Still seems like from a legal standpoint it would be better to have kids, live together and not be married. If things fall apart, you're only on the hook for child support and don't have to pay alimony or have your assets taken away.
-
04-22-2019, 11:00 AM #3844
-
04-22-2019, 11:40 AM #3845Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,033
[QUOTE=throwitaway9876;5655402]Yep, everything was separate. We didn't have a single account together. I owned the house, my truck, etc in my name only. She owned her car. We both make decent money. I think the split without the government getting involved was equitable. I keep what I worked for. She keeps what she worked for.
.QUOTE]
back in the day Buddy told me any kids would have been the end of the common law modern marriage becuz it would then be under the family relations act
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...rticle9847452/
but according to this^^ if you live together for 2 years you are good as married, the exception is " Excluded property " but its just in BC
an interesting point was that now a parent denying acess could be fined up to 5000$ by the courts
so the law is different everywhere and the law changesLee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
-
04-22-2019, 11:51 AM #3846
CL marriage in CO gets tricky and $$ fast because it can be so fact intensive.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR ForumsIf we're gonna wear uniforms, we should all wear somethin' different!
-
04-22-2019, 01:20 PM #3847
-
04-22-2019, 01:43 PM #3848
some shrews are venomous
-
04-22-2019, 02:14 PM #3849
-
04-22-2019, 03:27 PM #3850Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- northern BC
- Posts
- 31,033
well all their friends sided with her, they all told her she was entitlled to half his stuff which is how these things often go
He said not so, calculated that he could either give her half his networth or go to court which would be several times cheaper if he won, since he did win it ONLY net cost him 100K (he could afford it ) I heard she filed for bankruptcy (she couldn't afford it) , shrewd would have been for her is to negotiate a cash settlement to begin with instead of them both spending it all on lawyers BUT she wanted her day in courtLee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
Bookmarks