Page 118 of 146 FirstFirst ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... LastLast
Results 2,926 to 2,950 of 3644
  1. #2926
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    23,229
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiCougar View Post
    sorry no, no attraction there.

    pedophiles seem to flock to the left and democrats as sex with anything seems to be okay for those types and isn't one of the most important things by the left and democrats "climate change" ?
    Quote Originally Posted by SumJongGuy View Post
    Ski Coug falls for satire again thinking it was real LOL!
    apparently he believes in pizzagate too

    But in fairness to the Coug--stuff has gotten so weird lately that it's gotten almost impossible to tell the satire from the real stuff.

  2. #2927
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,439
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  3. #2928
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    7,377
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    apparently he believes in pizzagate too

    But in fairness to the Coug--stuff has gotten so weird lately that it's gotten almost impossible to tell the satire from the real stuff.

  4. #2929
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,223
    Quote Originally Posted by grinch View Post
    Haaaaaaa how many times has teh scoug done that now? Scoug is the definition of zero self awareness

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
    Skougin’ it, in other words.

    I for one appreciate having the misinformed right wingers on the forum, especially someone good-natured like Skougs. Gives a window into the cesspool dragging down our democracy without forcing you to wade in it directly.
    Know of a pair of Fischer Ranger 107Ti 189s (new or used) for sale? PM me.

  5. #2930
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Quote Originally Posted by frorider View Post
    Skougin’ it, in other words.

    I for one appreciate having the misinformed right wingers on the forum, especially someone good-natured like Skougs. Gives a window into the cesspool dragging down our democracy without forcing you to wade in it directly.
    I'd agree that Scoug's one of the innocent sheep following the more nefarious wolves. Just a good olde boy who wants to believe that we're not in any real imminent danger and that the American Dream is alive and well for everyone.
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  6. #2931
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,354
    There are plenty of Scougs out there and that's the really scary thing.

  7. #2932
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Watching over the valley
    Posts
    5,018
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    There are plenty of Scougs out there and that's the really scary thing.
    That's not the scary thing. The scary thing is they vote.

    sent from Utah.
    sigless.

  8. #2933
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,439
    I certainly would rather have the Scougs in Houston, and not one of the great places.
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  9. #2934
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,439
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  10. #2935
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,439
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  11. #2936
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    23,229
    23,000 euro per sqft. Holy fuck.

  12. #2937
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,540

  13. #2938
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,439
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  14. #2939
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    7,377
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Dayum them scientists are getting rich with all the funding they get

  15. #2940
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    23,229
    Quote Originally Posted by k2skier112 View Post
    Dayum them scientists are getting rich with all the funding they get
    They don't get rich but at least some of them--like the glaciologists I met on top of Lamarck Col-- do get paid to spend time in some cool places. How many glaciers are there in the world? Any scientist worth his salt should be able to find one no one has reported on and make it their own.

  16. #2941
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    7,377
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    They don't get rich but at least some of them--like the glaciologists I met on top of Lamarck Col-- do get paid to spend time in some cool places. How many glaciers are there in the world? Any scientist worth his salt should be able to find one no one has reported on and make it their own.
    that was dripping with passive aggressive sarcasm. that power-point probably took a few weeks to make....

  17. #2942
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Moose, Iowa
    Posts
    7,943
    Dallas Morning News poking the bear. Love it.


    https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/e...n-of-the-year/

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  18. #2943
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,625

  19. #2944
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    22,149
    Well that is depressing.
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  20. #2945
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    35,439
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  21. #2946
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,625
    Quote Originally Posted by Marmot or Fox View Post
    Well that is depressing.
    Yes, but hopeful at the same time as we haven't overshot the carbon budget. Yet.

  22. #2947
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    7,377
    Climate change had arrived at this island near the bottom of the world, and the giant kelp that flourished in its cold waters was among the first things to go.

    Over recent decades, the rate of ocean warming off Tasmania, Australia’s southernmost state and a gateway to the South Pole, has climbed to nearly four times the global average, oceanographers say.

    More than 95 percent of the giant kelp — a living high-rise of 30-foot stalks that served as a habitat for some of the rarest marine creatures in the world — died.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...ange-tasmania/

    In Oregon sea urchins are an issue;
    Beneath the waves, once towering kelp beds are collapsing from an unprecedented perfect storm that has been brewing below the surface. First, a massive epidemic wiped out sea stars, then a marine heatwave and El Niño, and now an explosion of sea urchins. This means bad news for kelp. The combination of abnormally warm water and a huge number of sea urchins have taken a toll on once healthy kelp beds

    https://oregonmarinereserves.com/2019/10/24/urchins/

  23. #2948
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,625
    A new global study shows that that transitioning to 100% renewable energy would pay for itself in under 7 years:

    "A global effort to transition to 100 percent renewable energy by 2050 would cost nations $73 trillion upfront — but the expense will pay for itself in under seven years, according to a new report from researchers at Stanford University. The study also found that the shift to a zero-carbon global economy would create 28.6 million more full-time jobs than if nations continue their current reliance on fossil fuels."

    The report, published in the journal One Earth, presents detailed roadmaps for how 143 countries that account for 99.7 percent of all global greenhouse gas emissions could successfully transition to 100 percent renewable energy by 2050. The report is a follow up to a 2015 study by the same research team that generated state-by-state plans for the United States, findings that helped lay the groundwork for the Democratic Party’s proposed Green New Deal.

    “There are a lot of countries that have committed to doing something to counteract the growing impacts of global warming, but they still don’t know exactly what to do,” Mark Jacobson, a civil and environmental engineer at Stanford and lead author of the new report, said in a statement. “How it would work? How it would keep the lights on? To be honest, many of the policymakers and advocates supporting and promoting the Green New Deal don’t have a good idea of the details of what the actual system looks like or what the impact of a transition is. It’s more an abstract concept. So, we’re trying to quantify it and to pin down what one possible system might look like. This work can help fill that void and give countries guidance.”

    Total land required globally for new renewable energy infrastructure.
    Total land required globally for new renewable energy infrastructure. JACOBSON ET AL, 2019
    The roadmaps call for increased energy efficiency and the electrification of all energy sectors, including transportation, buildings, heating and cooling, industrial processes, agriculture, forestry, fishing, and the military. The blueprint also finds it is technically and logistically feasible for countries to get 80 percent of their energy needs from wind, hydroelectricity, and solar by 2030, and 100 percent by 2050. The analysis excludes nuclear power, biofuels, and clean coal. New renewable energy infrastructure would require just 0.17 percent of the 143 countries’ total land area, as well as 0.48 percent of land for “spacing purposes,” such as the area between turbines, according to a press release.

    In the U.S., reaching 100 percent renewable energy by 2050 will require an investment of $7.8 trillion. It will involve building 288,000 new 5-megawatt (MW) wind turbines and 16,000 100-MW solar farms on 1.08 percent of U.S. land (85 percent of that land will be used for spacing purposes, and could serve other functions, such as for farmland). Such an initiative would create 3.1 million more jobs than if the U.S. stayed on a business-as-usual trajectory, and would save 63,000 lives from air pollution every year, the report said. The decarbonization plan would also reduce energy costs by $1.3 trillion per year, because renewable energy is cheaper to generate over time than fossil fuels. In addition, the plan would cut health and climate costs by $700 billion and $3.1 trillion annually, respectively, compared to current fossil fuel infrastructure.

    “There’s really no downside to making this transition,” Jacobson told Bloomberg News. “Most people are afraid it will be too expensive. Hopefully this will allay some of those fears.”
    https://e360.yale.edu/digest/the-glo...gy-73-trillion

  24. #2949
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    22,149
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  25. #2950
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,625
    Gordon Butte is a very interesting project. There are more storage options than just lithium ion. The CEO behind it used to teach skiing at Bridger too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •