Results 51 to 72 of 72
Thread: Trends in Rocker
-
04-06-2015, 06:12 PM #51
-
04-06-2015, 07:04 PM #52
-
04-06-2015, 07:18 PM #53
Still a little sketch running bases flat. Gonna try the Liberty Variant 113 as a replacement next season. The Katana is oh-so-close to being a resort one-ski quiver. Won't replace a few skis for special days (narrow carvers and Head m103s), but I'd be ok if it was my only ski. Add a PM Gear Kusala Pure and a Down Countdown 102 and quiver is done.
-
04-07-2015, 11:12 AM #54
-
04-07-2015, 11:17 AM #55
-
04-07-2015, 11:45 AM #56
-
04-07-2015, 12:32 PM #57
^^^ I'm not saying I have never skid turned.
My attitude is essentially: Find the fall line and make turns around it (preferably smooth, pretty turns at speed).
edit: Or put more eloquently: Find the Fucking Fall-line and make Fast Fluid Fucking turns around it.
... and make good use terrain features along the way.Last edited by pfluffenmeister; 04-07-2015 at 04:00 PM.
In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...
-
04-07-2015, 02:29 PM #58
This thread=
-
04-07-2015, 02:52 PM #59
That mindset is the reason skier visits have plateaued. As I'm sure our friend, and resident self proclaimed celebrity, DigiDeath would agree a "real skier" doesn't need soft snow to have fun and shred. Given the choice of 50 days or 10 days of skiing I would surely choose 50. Hopefully not all of those would be hard pack, but even they were... having the proper ski width for your average local conditions, you could still go out and have a lot of fun.
If you can't have fun skiing hard pack snow what's the point of skiing? Unless your some big time sponsored athlete, or the GSA, constantly skiing pow on the backs of others...
I would like to think someone from Cali would be embracing low tide tools. Then again, you do root for the 49ers! ;-)
-
04-07-2015, 03:09 PM #60
-
04-07-2015, 03:48 PM #61
Last edited by XavierD; 04-09-2015 at 06:54 PM.
-
04-07-2015, 04:19 PM #62
Actually, if it really came down to it I'd probably take the 50 days. I'm just sick of skiing firm snow since we've had enough of it the past four years. And no, I'm not one of those guys out there with my 110mm+ skis on boiler plate. But if I did only have one pair, I'd definitely favor soft conditions over firm and probably get something around 105-ish.
-
04-07-2015, 05:15 PM #63
-
04-07-2015, 05:57 PM #64
My 190 Q Labs are tons of fun on groomers. Not what I bought them for, but rather a pleasant benefit of camber and sidecut in the right doses.
I know Q Labs aren't EpicSki approved, so perhaps one of the moderators can erase this post. ;-)In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...
-
04-07-2015, 08:18 PM #65
TRENDS IN ROCKER:
Wouldn't it be cool if someone made a ski that had multiple sections of camber but was more or less flat underfoot, and also had simulated sidecut across the length of the whole ski but actually had reverse sidecut underfoot. That way you could actually easily carve, pivot, and slarve on hardpack and pow...wait.
I was actually wondering if this concept* would work in a narrow waisted ski or whether you need a certain amount waist width to make the reverse sidecut work. As far as I know Down is the only other company to experiment with reverse sidecut/camber in a narrower ski.
-
04-09-2015, 06:50 PM #66
-
04-09-2015, 07:52 PM #67
-
04-09-2015, 07:56 PM #68Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- central sierra
- Posts
- 571
-
04-09-2015, 09:19 PM #69
seriously what? Not saying it was/is necessary to make a narrower concept but more wondering if it would work. The Protest-Wootest conversion seemed to work after some tweeking.
or did you think I was making that whole description up? http://www.praxisskis.com/products/2015-concept.html
-
05-23-2015, 10:07 PM #70one-track mind
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- NorCal
- Posts
- 2,285
So many unexpected comments in this thread.
I agree with Doremite's view:
The O.P. wrote:
Specific ski designs are LESS confidence inspiring than others at some combinations of speed and surface conditions, while simultaneously being MORE confidence inspiring at other combinations of speed and surface conditions.
E.G. Arne (R.I.P.) at Blizzard designed with rocker to “water down” hardcore charger designs like Zeus, to better enable safely scrubbing speed while at very high speed, with intent to increase confidence for even higher speeds inbetween reliable scrubs. It takes a very powerful skier to consider the last "old" Zeus 194cm (not rockered) to be “more confidence inspiring” than the recent Bodacious or Cochise (rockered).
E.G. An old 193cm m103 with home-bent rocker will be more confidence inspiring at low speeds/tight billygoating terrain than a non-rockered pair, but less confidence inspiring at highest speeds in wide open terrain.
I don’t pay attention to and don’t care what the masses do, as long as they continue to pump money into the industry to enable production of niche market skis for the Maggots’ niche demands. Even better when the misguided demands of the masses influence ski manufacturers to flood the market with way too many sick burl raceroom-type skis that the masses cannot even handle—so I always have the option to buy a pair for $150 a few years later or whatever.
1. If you're on this forum, you're likely the type of skier who should NOT be skiing on skis you don't absolutely love. So, NEVER sell your old ski until AFTER your new ski beats your old ski hands-down in your multiple A-B head-to-head tests. With that method, sometimes you will end up keeping your old ski and selling your new ski after only a few days on it. (Note: This method requires you to turn down ski sponsorships, haha). If you always buy skis at reasonable low prices, then you can re-sell it used without a huge loss.
2. It is silly for one’s default mindset to be that one’s next ski purchase should be the latest year’s model. It is silly to think that old, used skis are not as good as new models. We want the masses to believe those silly things, so they will indirectly feed our niche market.
3. RE: “quiver-of-one”. I am surprised that some Maggots still like the one-ski approach. Especially after 4 consecutive not-so-great retail winters, when you can now buy pairs at $150-200 each. But, I understand why some people prefer to really master one ski, and always rely on pilot reflex habits formed ONLY using that one ski.
.Last edited by Vitamin I; 05-24-2015 at 01:40 PM.
- TRADE your heavy PROTESTS for my lightweight version at this thread
"My biggest goal in life has always been to pursue passion and to make dreams a reality. I love my daughter, but if I had to quit my passions for her, then I would be setting the wrong example for her, and I would not be myself anymore. " -Shane
"I'm gonna go SO OFF that NO ONE's ever gonna see what I'm gonna do!" -Saucerboy
-
05-23-2015, 11:39 PM #71
-
05-24-2015, 12:56 PM #72
I actually don't really care so much about 'clean carves', but I know what you mean. IMO it's still more than capable when up on edge though. What it may lack in pure conventional carving capabilities it more than makes up for in terms of the variety of possible turn shapes/types in even the most minimal of 3d snow. It seems like a shame you didn't give them more than two runs, but i guess when you know, you know. Still I think its one of the most unique and fun to ski applications of rocker/shaping out there.
Bookmarks