Page 96 of 109 FirstFirst ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ... LastLast
Results 2,376 to 2,400 of 2711
  1. #2376
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    766
    Thanks for all of the feedback. I'm happy with the Brahma in 177, should I stick with the same length on the Bonafide? I'm 5'8" and 185

  2. #2377
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    inw
    Posts
    1,282
    Quote Originally Posted by carlh View Post
    I’m a bit bigger than you 6’3” 205 and err towards fast so looking at the 189s. I have wide skis for fresh but would want these to do well in leftover chop at speed. What variable conditions do you not like it in? I’m coming from a set of goliaths and want something stiff, damp with good edge hold but with tails that are a bit easier to release than the fully flat and non tapered goliaths.
    I would definitely go with the 189s at your size.

    These are perfect for leftovers/afternoon chop if you've got fairly consistent snow quality. Just don't expect to ski lazy.

    I avoid deeper / layered / unknown variable on these because I don't want to die. Between the stiffness + propensity to run... It's not my preferred ski when I don't know what's lurking below. (would grab my OG Cochise)

    Can't comment on goliaths, but everything you want lines up with these sticks.
    Last edited by ntblanks; 02-02-2023 at 05:59 PM.

  3. #2378
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,907
    Old news...

    But on my 21/22 188 R11s, I decided to move the mount up again from the rec line to +1. (And now mounted with Cast.)

    Holy crap - I cannot believe how much I love them at +1. So engaged, but still super flickable, even more stable, and excellent in pow, groomers, and bumps. Impressive.

    So good...that I'm sorta curious what +2 would be like!!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6789 (1).jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	1.43 MB 
ID:	445831
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6789.jpg 
Views:	95 
Size:	1.49 MB 
ID:	445830  
    sproing!

  4. #2379
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,907
    Also, are anyone else's Rustlers basically totally flat (no camber)?

    Me gusta.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6790 (1).jpg 
Views:	108 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	445832
    sproing!

  5. #2380
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    Wow those are flat! Many days on em?

    As someone who has skied +2 and +1 on the rustler 11 192, I think +1 is better. A bit more natural feeling on edge and still flickable.

  6. #2381
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,907
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    Wow those are flat! Many days on em?

    As someone who has skied +2 and +1 on the rustler 11 192, I think +1 is better. A bit more natural feeling on edge and still flickable.
    Probably 20-25 days on them. I like em like that. Still hold an edge but so surfy and slarvey too.
    sproing!

  7. #2382
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,888

    What's Blizzard up to?

    I was +1.5cm on my R11s….were great there. +1cm if I was to do again (shorter bsl now so more centered on the ski).


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  8. #2383
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,399

    What's Blizzard up to?

    Funny, I mounted 19-20 R/S11s for 307mm BSL^ then got new boots at 293 and had *juuuuust enough* adjustment room on the binding to get them in there. It hasn’t occurred to me that I also like the new boot center location better than the old one!

    ^Actually I think I drilled for 305 on the line, so was -0.1cm before and moved up to +0.6cm. But I can totally see +1 being money.

    Also I did get confirmation from Blizzard Nordica Tech Support that in 180 cm the Sheeva 11 has always been exactly the same as Rustler 11. I presume it’s the same for 187 and is a good way to save dough if you can stand the glittery feathers … the glitter is growing on me! (I call mine “Glistlers”)

    I’m solidly convinced that this ski with Duke PTs and favorite resort capable tech toe boot of choice will be the ultimate mid winter travel ski.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  9. #2384
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,395
    There’s a pair of the pornstar sticks over on newschoolers in there track pant store. Hustler 11 in a 180 still in the plastic for $450.

  10. #2385
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    59715
    Posts
    7,485
    Attention Kmart shoppers... I picked up their last pair of 180's for my darling daughter, but that was two price drops ago. I guess they need to get rid of these.

    https://www.evo.com/outlet/skis/bliz...2695/clone.jpg

  11. #2386
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,395
    What’s the consensus on the bodacious 196 mount. +2 was were I was headed. Is that wrong?

    here, this is for the drool factor…. Love me a Virgin.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C1078E70-B72E-421B-A373-61C787A07695.jpg 
Views:	131 
Size:	503.3 KB 
ID:	446587

  12. #2387
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Bronco View Post
    Thanks for all of the feedback. I'm happy with the Brahma in 177, should I stick with the same length on the Bonafide? I'm 5'8" and 185
    I'm a little lighter than you and have both the 177 and 183 - love them both, but the 177 are mounted on the line and the 183 is +1.

  13. #2388
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    I'm a little lighter than you and have both the 177 and 183 - love them both, but the 177 are mounted on the line and the 183 is +1.
    Thanks Greg!

  14. #2389
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    666
    I mounted my 196s +2 and love them there.

    Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

  15. #2390
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,131
    New 11 skis chopped up hot pow and the untouched variety just fine.

    186 feels significantly shorter than the previous 188, and is quicker in tight places without having to cheat the turns. New 186 floats significantly better than the old 188. Really couldn’t stuff the tips in 15in of sunny cascadia pow.

    Really impressed with how seamlessly the ski handles a wide range of turn shapes, in a wide range of snow conditions. I think folks who have been really happy with the 188 might find the 186 a bit short, but I only really wished it was longer a couple times over the day. Looking forward to seeing if the 192 has the same rocker profile as the 186. Could be absolutely fantastic.

    I find the new metal layer/shape goes a long way to keeping the tips quiet. Even when they start to come unglued at higher speeds they don’t flap around. I’ve noticed this in other skis with a similar metal layer.

    186, skied on the line

  16. #2391
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,947
    Exciting Xavier, Greg mentioned they reminded him of the gunsmoke with metal, you agree?

    No 192s before next season right?

  17. #2392
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,131
    That’s my understanding. Rocker lines are much more gunsmoke than previous rustler. Tip shape / taper is more rustler than gunsmoke.
    I didn’t get along with the gunsmoke as many other people did. I needed to be back 2cm to get them to really work for me. I think the wide tip and especially tail weren’t my friend. I have had the same issue with other big fat tail rockered skis (Caylor, Hellbent). Didn’t have these issues with the new rustler.

  18. #2393
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,762
    Evo is having some pretty insane prices on 2022 Blizzard skis. Cochise, Bonafide, Brahma, Sheeva (long lengths).

    https://www.evo.com/shop/sale/ski/skis/blizzard

  19. #2394
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    the Low Sierra
    Posts
    17,820
    yeah some good deals there
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  20. #2395
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Posts
    76
    Those Bones are tempting. Anyone mount their Bones forward of recommended? Sounds like the updated version is pretty demanding, even more so than past iterations.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #2396
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    341
    Quote Originally Posted by BlazersTimbers503 View Post
    Those Bones are tempting. Anyone mount their Bones forward of recommended? Sounds like the updated version is pretty demanding, even more so than past iterations.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I'm at plus 1 on 189s (6'2/195, P15 GWs/Kryptons/317 BSL @WB); bumped forward as I was a bit intimidated, and happy there, but no doubt the bump would have worked also. Still love my pair; I use em as firm only (hasn't snowed in a week sorta thing), and they're fantastic, on and off piste. If there's more than a few inches, Katana 108s or FL113s come out, as I find em a bit challenging to release in West Coast 3D snow, though some on here don't seem to have my issue, and ski em well in 3D. Great fuckin skis.

  22. #2397
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Posts
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Sylvan View Post
    I'm at plus 1 on 189s (6'2/195, P15 GWs/Kryptons/317 BSL @WB); bumped forward as I was a bit intimidated, and happy there, but no doubt the bump would have worked also. Still love my pair; I use em as firm only (hasn't snowed in a week sorta thing), and they're fantastic, on and off piste. If there's more than a few inches, Katana 108s or FL113s come out, as I find em a bit challenging to release in West Coast 3D snow, though some on here don't seem to have my issue, and ski em well in 3D. Great fuckin skis.
    Oh man… I really don’t need to drop any more money on skis but you’re makin’ it tough. Did you experiment with mount point at all or try anything forward of +1? Or only +1?

  23. #2398
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    341
    Nope, just plus 1 (which I realize isn't all that helpful, haha), though pretty sure there are some rippers on here on the line with no complaints. I personally have no need to move my pair, but, with time on em, would have no issue going back to the line I don't think; I have no need to go forward, but prefer trad mounts. There's tons of positive info on em buried in this thread, and Bandit started up a Bonafide 97 thread as well with good info. If you like traditionally mounted, cambered, metal lam skis, these'll find a place in your quiver. Hope that helps.

  24. #2399
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    10
    They have the new Rustler 11 in 192 in store at Snell Sports Chamonix now👍

  25. #2400
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Back in Seattle
    Posts
    1,276
    I just picked up a set of the 189s and mounted on the line. They like forward pressure and speed but I would be hesitant to call them demanding. What do you want to gain by mounting forward?

    Quote Originally Posted by BlazersTimbers503 View Post
    Those Bones are tempting. Anyone mount their Bones forward of recommended? Sounds like the updated version is pretty demanding, even more so than past iterations.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •