Page 20 of 109 FirstFirst ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 2711
  1. #476
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,285
    Quote Originally Posted by PhishingME View Post
    How different are the 18 Brahma vs 17?
    It's different.

    http://www.skiessentials.com/Chairli...rd-Ski-Preview
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  2. #477
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,290
    Quote Originally Posted by PhishingME View Post
    How different are the 18 Brahma vs 17?
    Here's what I remember from last month's trade show but I won't get to handle the skis until next month.

    There's two Brahma versions for 17/18.

    The existing metal version has been tweaked by reducing the sidecut which is now 17m in the 180cm length v the existing 19m radius. Blizzard have done the same on the Bonafide & the Cochise.

    The second version is the Brahma CA which has had its metal replaced with carbon to give a slightly softer flex & a big weight reduction.

  3. #478
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,131
    No change to Cochise

  4. #479
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,290
    Quote Originally Posted by XavierD View Post
    No change to Cochise
    According to the above link the Cochise has a different tip shape & rocker profile, even if the radius is unchanged?

  5. #480
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,342
    Quote Originally Posted by Spyderjon View Post
    According to the above link the Cochise has a different tip shape & rocker profile, even if the radius is unchanged?
    Incorrect, the Cochise has not been changed from its current form. They are wrong. If you read back, even the blizzard rep said it was not being changed

  6. #481
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    494

    What's Blizzard up to?

    Update on the new Spur. Remounted mine from -2 to the line. Going -2 was definitely no bueno. Now the skis feel much better balanced and have better tail support. Incredible fun to ski in powder but still lower speed limit than the old Spurs in anything hard and on the piste.
    I'm not exactly sure if the time of skis > 120 mm waist just didn't expire with the snowpack of the recent years here in the Alps.
    Last edited by roQer; 03-28-2017 at 10:48 AM.

  7. #482
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swiss alps -> Bozone,MT
    Posts
    671
    Quote Originally Posted by roQer View Post
    I'm not exactly sure if the time of skis > 120 mm waist just didn't expired with the snowpack of the recent years here in the Alps.
    True. The last two seasons I havent ever whished I had something in that range.

    Sadly.

    Where in the Alps are you based?

  8. #483
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    494
    Arlberg/Austria

  9. #484
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Lamebird
    Posts
    430
    Anyone know what the new-old bodacious will be going for next year?

    Was planning on just picking up dead stock of the old OG bodacious but had a conversation with Arne's father the other day that I kind of want to pick up some of the new ones. Although I might still just buy dead stock and make a donation separately.

  10. #485
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    494
    Quote Originally Posted by straightlineorbust View Post
    Anyone know what the new-old bodacious will be going for next year?

    Was planning on just picking up dead stock of the old OG bodacious but had a conversation with Arne's father the other day that I kind of want to pick up some of the new ones. Although I might still just buy dead stock and make a donation separately.
    There is some info on the new Bode from GregL in another thread. According to him the tip rocker is 1 cm lower and the tail rocker .5 cm higher than in the 14/15 green-yellow version.
    Whatever this means for the characteristics on snow.

  11. #486
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Lamebird
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by roQer View Post
    There is some info on the new Bode from GregL in another thread. According to him the tip rocker is 1 cm lower and the tail rocker .5 cm higher than in the 14/15 green-yellow version.
    Whatever this means for the characteristics on snow.
    Hmm interesting, I'm currently on the red-yellow 2013/2014 which I believe is the exact same as the green/yellow version. I can't see less tip rocker on this ski as a good thing, but more on the rear could make sense I'll have to find what GregL said about them because they're pretty much perfect as they are right now.

  12. #487
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    494
    Quote Originally Posted by straightlineorbust View Post
    Hmm interesting, I'm currently on the red-yellow 2013/2014 which I believe is the exact same as the green/yellow version. I can't see less tip rocker on this ski as a good thing, but more on the rear could make sense I'll have to find what GregL said about them because they're pretty much perfect as they are right now.
    Pretty much my thoughts. .5 cm more tail rocker could make some sense but the forebody is just perfect as it is.

  13. #488
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,364
    Not sure I like the flatter tip, as it makes an already "unfloaty" ski even less so, so the 2018 version definitely goes through stuff rather than over it. On the other hand, the slightly increased tail rocker is nice in tight spaces and bumps. I don't have a 13/14 around to compare, but I thought it had a totally flat tail?

  14. #489
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Lamebird
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Not sure I like the flatter tip, as it makes an already "unfloaty" ski even less so, so the 2018 version definitely goes through stuff rather than over it. On the other hand, the slightly increased tail rocker is nice in tight spaces and bumps. I don't have a 13/14 around to compare, but I thought it had a totally flat tail?
    Yahh, it's pretty much a flat tail, they say it has tail rocker but it's at most a centimeter across the whole tail.

    And interesting, I feel like the 13/14 actually is pretty rad because it does tend to ride over crud instead of through it. Well, it rides through it when you're going slow and then as soon as you have some speed you're able to stay on top.

    Anyone ski on the old bodacious, new "old" bodacious, and the rustler 11 as to give them a comparison.

    Trying to figure out what to use as my comp ski next year. Thing I love about the 13/14 Bodacious I'm on is as long as your feet are beneath you, you can basically ride out anything.

    Edit: Actually found a picture of the rocker profile, the tail is basically flat with a touch of rocker. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	tail-344x1024.jpg 
Views:	224 
Size:	55.3 KB 
ID:	203934

  15. #490
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The City by the Bay
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by straightlineorbust View Post
    Anyone know what the new-old bodacious will be going for next year?

    Was planning on just picking up dead stock of the old OG bodacious but had a conversation with Arne's father the other day that I kind of want to pick up some of the new ones. Although I might still just buy dead stock and make a donation separately.
    I demoed them last weekend from Granite Chief at Squaw (they were awesome). I don't remember exact numbers, but they were somewhere in this ballpark based on what the Granite Chief employee said I could buy them for:
    - $900+ "retail" (forget the actual number)
    - about $695 if I bought them then and there at a 15% demo day discount from their store price. He said their normal store price is always below retail.
    - so about an $800 non-sale store price

  16. #491
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    291
    Do you know what the 188 Rustler 11 weighs?
    Quote Originally Posted by wasatchback View Post
    1850ish

  17. #492
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,176
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0031.PNG.jpg 
Views:	606 
Size:	272.2 KB 
ID:	204838

    What ski is this?

  18. #493
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    440
    Quote Originally Posted by nyskirat View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0031.PNG.jpg 
Views:	606 
Size:	272.2 KB 
ID:	204838

    What ski is this?
    Throwback graphics on new/old bodacious

    https://www.google.com/search?q=bliz...DoavM:&spf=159

  19. #494
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Lamebird
    Posts
    430
    Talked to the blizzard rep at snowbird today, to settle the debate about whether the new old bodacious is really the same as the old one.

    They just pulled out the old molds, and did the same construction. So good news for people looking for burliness

  20. #495
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,531
    Quote Originally Posted by nyskirat View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0031.PNG.jpg 
Views:	606 
Size:	272.2 KB 
ID:	204838

    What ski is this?
    So sick.

    I raced a couple pairs of Thermo V20s BITD.
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    the situation strikes me as WAY too much drama at this point

  21. #496
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,342
    Are the retro graphics available to the public? I wasn't going to get a pair, but if I can get a sweet looking pair...

  22. #497
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,753
    Damn, I'd have to get pair if those. Raced on V20 Thermo SL and RS back then, though preferred the RS pretty much everywhere.

  23. #498
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    494
    Quote Originally Posted by nyskirat View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0031.PNG.jpg 
Views:	606 
Size:	272.2 KB 
ID:	204838

    What ski is this?
    Nice!
    But I'd rather like to have the Bode in the design of the old Firebird from the Seventies, the racing ski of my dad:



    Even more killer!

  24. #499
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,690
    Quote Originally Posted by nyskirat View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0031.PNG.jpg 
Views:	606 
Size:	272.2 KB 
ID:	204838

    What ski is this?
    God damn I need that ski. The old school V20 Thermo SL put me on varsity Freshman year... flipping between #1 & #2 on the team all season. I killed it on that ski.

    Name:  ski-blizzard-absorber-foto-bild-r94123173.jpg
Views: 1707
Size:  3.9 KB

  25. #500
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Snowttingham
    Posts
    1,319
    fQlAqZi9
    i dont kare i carnt spell or youse punktuation properlee, im on a skiing forum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •