Page 178 of 385 FirstFirst ... 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 ... LastLast
Results 4,426 to 4,450 of 9618
  1. #4426
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Not DJSapp View Post
    Flexible dryer duct + spray foam insulation in a can. Split the dryer duct so you can get it over the copper, put a couple big hose clamps around it. Fill with spray foam.
    i was trying to figure what kind of jacketed system there might be out there
    diy works too
    thanks

  2. #4427
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,254
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    Curious to hear people's thoughts about this - when we did our paver patio, we were ordering 3/4 minus and sand and the landscape supply company where we were buying the material said "don't bother with the sand, in a few years it filters down through the gravel, we see it happen all the time." They told us to just get the 3/4 minus as smooth as possible with a compactor. I didn't think they'd steer us wrong in order to sell us less material, so we took their advice. It worked OK - we were using large 2' x 2' pavers with gaps in between for groundcover, so less sensitive to small height differences than small pavers laid without gaps, but it was a huge pain in the ass to get things reasonably level. What's up with this one yard giving different advice than the whole Internet?
    in my mind, the sand gives you adjustability
    the 3/4- is limited in that regard
    some don't care at that level of scrutiny

    we did one install at our old house (entry walkway) that was pretty bomber (you could have driven a dump truck on it...we over excavated & had a ton of base material in there...lol)
    no fabric btwn 3/4- & sand
    we had to brush in sand a little over the first year. But, after that, organics filled in the gaps, and we got moss in the joints which was better, despite not being all that drainable.

  3. #4428
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    Curious to hear people's thoughts about this - when we did our paver patio, we were ordering 3/4 minus and sand and the landscape supply company where we were buying the material said "don't bother with the sand, in a few years it filters down through the gravel, we see it happen all the time." They told us to just get the 3/4 minus as smooth as possible with a compactor. I didn't think they'd steer us wrong in order to sell us less material, so we took their advice. It worked OK - we were using large 2' x 2' pavers with gaps in between for groundcover, so less sensitive to small height differences than small pavers laid without gaps, but it was a huge pain in the ass to get things reasonably level. What's up with this one yard giving different advice than the whole Internet?
    dan_pdx...where did you get your 3/4 minus? I know you live east side and I live far westside, but curious. I am using paver bricks run tight against each other so I will use leveling sand to get preciseness.

    My soil is fairly packed dirt/clay and rocky. This just needs to look good, not look professional....its just a 20ft pathway between the flowerbeds like this:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	path.jpg 
Views:	57 
Size:	331.1 KB 
ID:	381287

  4. #4429
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbumpsalot View Post
    dan_pdx...where did you get your 3/4 minus? I know you live east side and I live far westside, but curious. I am using paver bricks run tight against each other so I will use leveling sand to get preciseness.

    My soil is fairly packed dirt/clay and rocky. This just needs to look good, not look professional....its just a 20ft pathway between the flowerbeds like this:
    Hey, I think we probably got our rock from Mt. Scott Fuel. This was 10+ years ago, but now that I recall, the "forget about the sand" advice was from a different place where we were buying decorative rock as part of that patio project, I think Oregon Decorative Rock. Mt Scott Fuel in particular has been reliable / good to work with. They do say they deliver to Beaverton, Tualatin, and Tigard.

    Sounds like we have the same soil - ours is hard clay. We were installing on a slight slope, and I don't remember the exact measure, but might have had about 8" on the shallow/downhill end of the excavation and more than that on the uphill side. I had to use a pickaxe for some of it, hard work to dig that stuff when it's dry.

  5. #4430
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    Hey, I think we probably got our rock from Mt. Scott Fuel. This was 10+ years ago, but now that I recall, the "forget about the sand" advice was from a different place where we were buying decorative rock as part of that patio project, I think Oregon Decorative Rock. Mt Scott Fuel in particular has been reliable / good to work with. They do say they deliver to Beaverton, Tualatin, and Tigard.
    I looked at Mt Scott...and its typical to what I see...just "crushed rock"....nothing described as paver base or like folks say here "3/4 minus".

  6. #4431
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbumpsalot View Post
    I looked at Mt Scott...and its typical to what I see...just "crushed rock"....nothing described as paver base or like folks say here "3/4 minus".
    I think this is the product people are talking about: https://mtscottfuel.com/product/3-4-crushed-rock/

  7. #4432
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    I think this is the product people are talking about: https://mtscottfuel.com/product/3-4-crushed-rock/
    Ok...someone earlier suggested this might not be the same thing (no smaller pieces or dust) and not good for compacting. I'll give a call, but in my experience if you don't know exactly what you are looking for....they don't either!

  8. #4433
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbumpsalot View Post
    Ok...someone earlier suggested this might not be the same thing (no smaller pieces or dust) and not good for compacting. I'll give a call, but in my experience if you don't know exactly what you are looking for....they don't either!
    I think that might be the one - it does say "has fines in it." But yeah, see what they say.

    I've rented a Uhaul trailer to get loads of barkdust from them before, but I don't think the savings is worth the added hassle, especially if you'd be making multiple trips from SW.

  9. #4434
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,030
    Construction question:
    I'm framing in a small cabin, 10'x12'. I ran the first floor joists on hangers and have built the walls with 2x6s with a 2 2x10 headers all along each wall.

    I'm about to start the second floor and was thinking about how to do the floor joists.
    I can either do them the standard way of setting them on top of the headers or I could do hangers off those headers.

    What's the wisdom or pros and cons of each?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0026_LI.jpg 
Views:	56 
Size:	1.82 MB 
ID:	381288   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0035_LI.jpg 
Views:	57 
Size:	1.72 MB 
ID:	381289  
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  10. #4435
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17,757
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    Curious to hear people's thoughts about this - when we did our paver patio, we were ordering 3/4 minus and sand and the landscape supply company where we were buying the material said "don't bother with the sand, in a few years it filters down through the gravel, we see it happen all the time." They told us to just get the 3/4 minus as smooth as possible with a compactor. I didn't think they'd steer us wrong in order to sell us less material, so we took their advice. It worked OK - we were using large 2' x 2' pavers with gaps in between for groundcover, so less sensitive to small height differences than small pavers laid without gaps, but it was a huge pain in the ass to get things reasonably level. What's up with this one yard giving different advice than the whole Internet?
    The sand layer is there to allow you to get pavers to level. It eventually binds tight as it gets rained on -- walk on the beach on the wet part and you will see it doesn't migrate like dry sand when it gets wet. It basically stays damp forever once the pavers are on top.
    The stone dust on top of the crushed basically makes the base basically impervious to water, then the sand is there to allow you to level it off.
    "timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang

  11. #4436
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    1,218
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    Hey, I think we probably got our rock from Mt. Scott Fuel. This was 10+ years ago, but now that I recall, the "forget about the sand" advice was from a different place where we were buying decorative rock as part of that patio project, I think Oregon Decorative Rock. Mt Scott Fuel in particular has been reliable / good to work with. They do say they deliver to Beaverton, Tualatin, and Tigard.

    Sounds like we have the same soil - ours is hard clay. We were installing on a slight slope, and I don't remember the exact measure, but might have had about 8" on the shallow/downhill end of the excavation and more than that on the uphill side. I had to use a pickaxe for some of it, hard work to dig that stuff when it's dry.
    Thanks for the reference on Mt Scott. I’ve been looking for a company that delivers in SW/_Tigard/Beaverton.

  12. #4437
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by old_newguy View Post
    Thanks for the reference on Mt Scott. I’ve been looking for a company that delivers in SW/_Tigard/Beaverton.
    I've always used Grimm's for mulch. They are located off 99W and Roy Rodgers in Sherwood/Tigard and deliver. Was planning to use for rock....if I can figure out what the right product is!

  13. #4438
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,254
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbumpsalot View Post
    Ok...someone earlier suggested this might not be the same thing (no smaller pieces or dust) and not good for compacting. I'll give a call, but in my experience if you don't know exactly what you are looking for....they don't either!
    Works great for compacting & drains way better, it's just more expensive
    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    I think that might be the one - it does say "has fines in it." But yeah, see what they say.

    I've rented a Uhaul trailer to get loads of barkdust from them before, but I don't think the savings is worth the added hassle, especially if you'd be making multiple trips from SW.
    Their "Clean 3/4" is the one without fines; you should be good on their "3/4 Crushed"

  14. #4439
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Highmen View Post
    Construction question:
    I'm framing in a small cabin, 10'x12'. I ran the first floor joists on hangers and have built the walls with 2x6s with a 2 2x10 headers all along each wall.

    I'm about to start the second floor and was thinking about how to do the floor joists.
    I can either do them the standard way of setting them on top of the headers or I could do hangers off those headers.

    What's the wisdom or pros and cons of each?
    either works - imho, easier to just frame on top
    i'm assuming a ladder gets you to the loft? [stairs won't fit]
    but what ceiling height did you anticipate?
    is there a roof hgt limitation you have to stay under?

  15. #4440
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    Posts
    1,337
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    Works great for compacting & drains way better, it's just more expensive


    Their "Clean 3/4" is the one without fines; you should be good on their "3/4 Crushed"
    Is the "sand" these guys sell the same as "leveling sand" ?

  16. #4441
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    1,218
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbumpsalot View Post
    I've always used Grimm's for mulch. They are located off 99W and Roy Rodgers in Sherwood/Tigard and deliver. Was planning to use for rock....if I can figure out what the right product is!
    Thanks!

  17. #4442
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,030
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    either works - imho, easier to just frame on top
    i'm assuming a ladder gets you to the loft? [stairs won't fit]
    but what ceiling height did you anticipate?
    is there a roof hgt limitation you have to stay under?
    It's small enough to not require a permit, so the stairs will be steep, not to code.

    I've planned a 4'x6' aperture through which the stairs will go, wrapping around the edge of the hole with stovepipe going up to the second floor ceiling.

    Ceiling height for floor 1 with either be 8' or 7' depending on the way I do the second floor.

    Second floor will have a 4' ceiling in back and 8' in front with a sloped "shed" roof.

    Hangers seems awfully easy....
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  18. #4443
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,254
    Quote Originally Posted by sirbumpsalot View Post
    Is the "sand" these guys sell the same as "leveling sand" ?
    dunno, i'd just ask them


    try calling Willamette Graystone for assembly tech questions...they're pretty helpful

  19. #4444
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Highmen View Post
    It's small enough to not require a permit, so the stairs will be steep, not to code.

    I've planned a 4'x6' aperture through which the stairs will go, wrapping around the edge of the hole with stovepipe going up to the second floor ceiling.

    Ceiling height for floor 1 with either be 8' or 7' depending on the way I do the second floor.

    Second floor will have a 4' ceiling in back and 8' in front with a sloped "shed" roof.

    Hangers seems awfully easy....
    nothing wrong w/ hangers

    but you're a tall guy...i'd go 8' clg

    [eta]look up "alternate tread stair" -- might be just the thing for your steep stair [tho warn residents cuz they go against normal expectation & require some clear headed use, descension esp]
    Last edited by ::: :::; 08-02-2021 at 12:53 PM.

  20. #4445
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    4,172
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Highmen View Post
    Construction question:
    I'm framing in a small cabin, 10'x12'. I ran the first floor joists on hangers and have built the walls with 2x6s with a 2 2x10 headers all along each wall.

    I'm about to start the second floor and was thinking about how to do the floor joists.
    I can either do them the standard way of setting them on top of the headers or I could do hangers off those headers.

    What's the wisdom or pros and cons of each?
    If the joists land on the studs you’re doing good. Ideally you want them to carry the load even with the header
    “I have a responsibility to not be intimidated and bullied by low life losers who abuse what little power is granted to them as ski patrollers.”

  21. #4446
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Highmen View Post
    It's small enough to not require a permit, so the stairs will be steep, not to code.

    I've planned a 4'x6' aperture through which the stairs will go, wrapping around the edge of the hole with stovepipe going up to the second floor ceiling.

    Ceiling height for floor 1 with either be 8' or 7' depending on the way I do the second floor.

    Second floor will have a 4' ceiling in back and 8' in front with a sloped "shed" roof.

    Hangers seems awfully easy....
    Hey, I don't remember if you mentioned this before - what's the scoop on your shed / cabin? Is it in your yard, or are you doing a backwoods hut? Just curious - I'm enjoying following the process.

  22. #4447
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,030
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    nothing wrong w/ hangers

    but you're a tall guy...i'd go 8' clg

    [eta]look up "alternate tread stair" -- might be just the thing for your steep stair [tho warn residents cuz they go against normal expectation & require some clear headed use, descension esp]
    I'm planning on trying to do a floating stair using cables to support the treads on the room side with 1 stringer on the wall side, running 12/12.

    Quote Originally Posted by snoqpass View Post
    If the joists land on the studs you’re doing good. Ideally you want them to carry the load even with the header
    That works for the N. wall, but the S. wall has a 78" wide window (actually a repurposed full relight wood door from salvage) in a wall 140" long. So I'll key it off the N. wall. Thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by dan_pdx View Post
    Hey, I don't remember if you mentioned this before - what's the scoop on your shed / cabin? Is it in your yard, or are you doing a backwoods hut? Just curious - I'm enjoying following the process.
    It's in our backyard. We have 5+ wooded acres E of Redmond. The house satisfies the "pee off the porches w/o getting arrested" attribute. See IG #dreamshack.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  23. #4448
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    742
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    i was trying to figure what kind of jacketed system there might be out there
    diy works too
    thanks
    My understanding is that the can foam has no significant R value, simply a gap filler.

  24. #4449
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Highmen View Post
    It's in our backyard. We have 5+ wooded acres E of Redmond. The house satisfies the "pee off the porches w/o getting arrested" attribute. See IG #dreamshack.
    Nice!

  25. #4450
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    747
    Quote Originally Posted by skialpy View Post
    My understanding is that the can foam has no significant R value, simply a gap filler.
    Can't measure an R value when you don't have a nominal thickness.
    Wait, how can we trust this guy^^^ He's clearly not DJSapp

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •