Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 158
  1. #76
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    EWA
    Posts
    22,013

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ontario Canada eh
    Posts
    4,389
    Quote Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds! View Post
    There's no arguing with the anti-wolf people. They're right up there with the craziest of the crazies.
    and to think I normally like crazy people but I guess there are times I shouldn't
    riser4 - Ignore me! Please!

    Kenny Satch - With pleasure

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    In the trees
    Posts
    1,276
    Monbiot's recent book Feral, is well written and worth a read. He is a journalist who pricks the conscience of the establishment, he is also an ecologist who knows about river functioning, and a prof/fellow of Oxford University.

    Also worth checking out is River Republic, the rise and fall of America's river, D.McCool. Another great read.
    Gone fishing

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Making the Bowl Great Again
    Posts
    13,780
    Quote Originally Posted by farmer View Post
    Outside the park there are hunters, so what do we need wolves for?
    I am swayed by this irrefutable logic.

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Retardbumville
    Posts
    854
    Wolves live under the laws of nature,without respect for hunting seasons, land ownership,or hunting hours.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    19,150
    And unlike Western man, they don't take more than they need to survive.
    Quote Originally Posted by leroy jenkins View Post
    I think you'd have an easier time understanding people if you remembered that 80% of them are fucking morons.
    That is why I like dogs, more than most people.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    2 hours from anything
    Posts
    10,754
    Quote Originally Posted by farmer View Post
    I'm willing to concede the need for an apex predator, and that the effects claimed by the twit in that video are probably real in areas where populations are left without any predators, either hunters or wolves. Outside the park there are hunters, so what do we need wolves for?
    Because hunters are so good at killing the small, weak, and sickly animals.

    In my professional opinion this calculation is very misleading. . http://extension.oregonstate.edu/wal...on_final_0.pdf
    Last edited by neufox47; 03-09-2014 at 10:25 PM.

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Shuswap Highlands
    Posts
    4,354
    Quote Originally Posted by liv2ski View Post
    And unlike Western man, they don't take more than they need to survive.
    Perhaps not, but sometimes they make considerations of their next meal in ways we humans can relate.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	59 
Size:	233.4 KB 
ID:	152193
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	47 
Size:	258.0 KB 
ID:	152195
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	282.3 KB 
ID:	152194

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    champlain valley
    Posts
    5,656

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,835
    Was just about to post that here, DBdude. Problem is that while that author is correct taht some studies have found problems with the trophic cascade theory in YNP, others have confirmed it, and he just chooses to ignore those. For this "skiing dentist" the takeaway is simply that ecosystems are quite complex, and cannot be simplified. And that conclusion merely reinforces the importance of the first rule of tinkering.

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    I think that some of the issues brought up in the rebuttal are simply the result of not enough time having passed. The willows in particular. It's not like willows can never grow there again, it's that they need to start by the water's edge, pull the water table out and up a little from there and then the trees can begin to spread. This is not a fast process.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    2,870
    Quote Originally Posted by farmer View Post
    As an engineer, if I state that a bridge can hold 25 tons and it fails at 5 tons, even a wildlife biologist can see that there is a problem. So when wildlife biologists tell us that grizzlies live in isolated populations and don't cross roads, rivers, or railroads and yet when they put a radio collar on them they track them going back and fourth hundreds of miles between these so called isolated areas, across rivers, roads and railroads, even an engineer can see that their underlying assumptions are flawed. Furthermore, at least one of the bears that they have identified in this area has been shown via DNA testing to be related to bears several hundred miles west in a separate population.
    I doubt there is a single wildlife biologist that has ever claimed that a bear will never cross a road, railroad or river.

    HOLY SHIT! Bears are related to each other!?!
    "These are crazy times Mr Hatter, crazy times. Crazy like Buddha! Muwahaha!"

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,835
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    I think that some of the issues brought up in the rebuttal are simply the result of not enough time having passed. The willows in particular. It's not like willows can never grow there again, it's that they need to start by the water's edge, pull the water table out and up a little from there and then the trees can begin to spread. This is not a fast process.
    Exactly. When doing stream restoration work, willows are planted "with wet feet," meaning that if we are planting in spring, we're actually putting them in the water, in the summer (when streams are at their lowest), we make sure the hole is extremely wet at bottom, and in fall we basically plnat right at the edge fo the water. The willow then spreads out from there over subsequent years. What we euphimistically call the "willow burrito" method, involves actually putting the base of the willow well below the median high water mark.

    Along the Gallatin River in YNP there is a test plot that NPS researchers built years ago. They went to a typical piece of river valley bottom. They fenced in a 10x10' section (roughly) with chainlink fence. The fence has zero effect on water table or water conditions, wind, bugs, birds, or even small mammals, but it keeps out large mammals. For years the plot inside the fence grew and grew, while the surrounding valley bottom was grazed down by elk and deer. It was a stark difference. Today, the area outside the fence has come a long way toward catching up. We see a lot less elk in that area, and everything has grown considerably taller.

    That is anecdotal only, but having witnessed it, it's hard to ignore.

  14. #89
    WWCD's Avatar
    WWCD is online now Non Threating Male Friend
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cameron Indoor Stadium
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by thebirdhunter View Post
    That dumb fuck Limey doesn't even know the difference between an elk and a deer and you think he going to know if wolves are changing rivers or not. Give me a fucking break.
    Has no one considered that he may not know Yellowstone's elevation?

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    10,496
    Quote Originally Posted by KQ View Post
    First they were mad, now they are sad. How very emoo.

  16. #91
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ventura Highway in the Sunshine
    Posts
    22,431
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamespio View Post
    They fenced in a 10x10' section (roughly) with chainlink fence. The fence has zero effect on water table or water conditions, wind, bugs, birds, or even small mammals, but it keeps out large mammals. For years the plot inside the fence grew and grew, while the surrounding valley bottom was grazed down by elk and deer. It was a stark difference. Today, the area outside the fence has come a long way toward catching up. We see a lot less elk in that area, and everything has grown considerably taller.

    That is anecdotal only, but having witnessed it, it's hard to ignore.
    Fuck the wolf, reintroduce the Yellowstone fence.

    I think the Gallatin fence is a subspecies of the greater Yellowstone fence.

    Paypal donations to Save the Yellowstone Fence Coalition, or just PM Rontele.

    I agree it is a constitutional right for Americans to be assholes...its just too bad that so many take the opportunity...
    iscariot

  17. #92
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ontario Canada eh
    Posts
    4,389
    Quote Originally Posted by hutash View Post
    Fuck the wolf, reintroduce the Yellowstone fence.

    I think the Gallatin fence is a subspecies of the greater Yellowstone fence.

    Paypal donations to Save the Yellowstone Fence Coalition, or just PM Rontele.
    thats very offensive or defencesive depending on what side of the fence you're on
    riser4 - Ignore me! Please!

    Kenny Satch - With pleasure

  18. #93
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Kenny Satch View Post
    thats very offensive or defencesive depending on what side of the fence you're on
    You upstart! I challenge you to a duel!

    Daniel Ortega eats here.

  19. #94
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ontario Canada eh
    Posts
    4,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Viva View Post
    You upstart! I challenge you to a duel
    I accept but can it be with lightsabers after 3 or 5 pitchers of beer ?
    Last edited by Kenny Satch; 03-10-2014 at 12:52 PM.
    riser4 - Ignore me! Please!

    Kenny Satch - With pleasure

  20. #95
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    Quote Originally Posted by WWCD View Post
    Has no one considered that he may not know Yellowstone's elevation?
    he probably doesn't even know where we store the moguls in the summertime.

  21. #96
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    First they were mad, now they are sad. How very emoo.
    eat more chikin?

  22. #97
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    13,385
    Quote Originally Posted by Viva View Post
    You upstart! I challenge you to a duel!

    Sword fighting for beekeepers.

  23. #98
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ontario Canada eh
    Posts
    4,389
    Quote Originally Posted by pisteoff View Post
    Sword fighting for beekeepers.
    Viva's picture is ingenious but I'll give high marks for that one
    riser4 - Ignore me! Please!

    Kenny Satch - With pleasure

  24. #99
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    13,447
    Better?



    And this is strangely exciting:

    Daniel Ortega eats here.

  25. #100
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    out yonder
    Posts
    318
    For those of you getting hung up on the elk/deer thing... This is a fragment of a 2013 Ted Talk (http://www.ted.com/talks/george_monb...wild_the_world) that someone (sustainableman.org?) has used in a video. The bit featured in the video starts at around 3:10.

    If anyone was having a difficulty telling the difference between the deer and elk, I'd imagine it might have been the videographer.

    Now feel free to resume the dick, er, sword waving.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •