In that case, you need to tie those costs to bitcoin as well, since it relies upon a stable fiat currency to express its value, and if not, you have to figure out how much an unstable currency costs the economy that relies upon it and account for that.
I’m skeptical that propping up the dollar is anything more than a poor expression for what is actually propping up a stable economy. Which bitcoin relies upon, its dubious utility in skidding economies notwithstanding.
In other words: nonsense points are nonsense.
Bookmarks