Results 76 to 100 of 133
-
11-26-2013, 10:07 AM #76
This is something that has been discussed for a long time... adding sensors to monitor levels of impacts and base lining all players motor/cognitive skills. I remember 8, 9, 10 years ago, they were already talking about this (maybe not monitoring it wirelessly through an app, but all other things the same). I guess I'm not convinced this has much tangible use though - because in 10 years of data monitoring (at least on a some level), there have been no major benefits coming out of this type of research. I don't think any new hypothesis about how to reduce the risk, or new products developed based on information learned. I haven't read everything on X2's website, but what conclusions are they trying to reach? The only benefit to this type of tech is to remove a person from activity after the first concussion, to eliminate the risk of a 2nd subsequent concussion. If that is their value proposition - I understand.
But I still think it's like having an engine overheat warning light in your car, turn on only after you've blown your motor....
It'd be interesting to find out if there has ever been a study of how different brains/heads react to identical impacts, but from a cognitive standpoint, and an MRI standpoint. For instance, does my brain bruise more easily than your brain in a similar impact, just like certain peoples skin bruises more/less easily than others. Anyone know/seen anything like that?
-
11-26-2013, 10:17 AM #77Hugh Conway Guest
-
11-26-2013, 10:44 AM #78"Its not the arrow, its the Indian" - M.Pinto
-
11-26-2013, 10:51 AM #79
^^prolly has been done in monkeys.
-
11-26-2013, 10:55 AM #80Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Mostly in a bad dream
- Posts
- 562
-
11-26-2013, 11:01 AM #81
-
11-26-2013, 11:50 AM #82Hugh Conway Guest
-
11-26-2013, 12:02 PM #83Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Mostly in a bad dream
- Posts
- 562
-
11-26-2013, 12:41 PM #84
I'm simply saying - that I still hope the helmet tech envelope can be pushed further... I'm not looking for a precursory warning system, obviously - just stating that time/money invested in prevention is still more worthwhile (IMO), than data collection post incident. I still think there is room to improve helmet material/combos that could improve upon today's helmets... Not safeguard againts ALL impacts, but more so than current ones do.
I guess I was expecting interesting conversation on possible helmet compositions that could help. To hear people's ideas different than my own. I got some of that, and then I got the same old "don't hit your head" argument again. I get it - but shit happens.
I'm not signing up - but I'm sure we could find at least that many... and if not living humans, maybe donated brains from deceased, or I'm sure some lab would be willing to plunk a couple monkeys. Not sure how well those translate to living human analogies, but it'd be interesting.
-
11-26-2013, 01:34 PM #85
I found it interesting in this video that bell doesnt even think about protection. Its all about looks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSF6...e_gdata_player
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using TGR ForumsBest Skier on the Mountain
Self-Certified
1992 - 2012
Squaw Valley, USA
-
11-26-2013, 03:21 PM #86spook Guest
they should just put airbags in every helmet that can be reinserted (automatic suction function) and recharged between each play.
-
12-30-2013, 04:25 AM #87klimgeyt
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Netherlands
- Posts
- 4
Having read this thread, post Schumacher's injury, I conclude:
1 Wear a helmet, despite the limited, if any, protection against concussions. POC seems favourite
2 Ski in and on soft materials: snow or prepared slopes. Avoid ice, rocks, trees, walls and other constructions. Choose your path carefully
3 Slow down. May I suggest telemark skiing?
4 Buy the next technology. ODS from 6dhelmets sounds promising.
-
12-30-2013, 10:46 AM #88
-
12-30-2013, 10:56 AM #89
-
12-30-2013, 10:57 AM #90Hugh Conway Guest
-
12-30-2013, 11:09 AM #91
Some of the biggest head whacking whippets I've taken have been somewhat low speed telemark ing. Skis stop, face/head drives forward into snow. I'm seeing little birdies just trying to remember
I rip the groomed on tele gear
-
12-30-2013, 11:46 AM #92
5 mouth guard 6 butt plug
-
12-30-2013, 12:32 PM #93
-
12-30-2013, 12:39 PM #94Hugh Conway Guest
-
12-30-2013, 03:57 PM #95Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Mostly in a bad dream
- Posts
- 562
You'd have to slow down significantly. I thought I remember reading that even certified ski helmets were only tested to velocities up to 15km/hr. I could be wrong. I guess skiing way steeper terrain would be of assistance but for the vast majority of even the most gaperific skiers, 15km/hour would be super slow.
First 360 mute grab --> Andrew Sheppard --> Snowdrifters 1996
-
12-30-2013, 04:12 PM #96
Ski helmet will probably help if you hit the snow with your head. If you're skiing 40mph (don't know about this kph stuff) your head doesn't hit the snow at that speed. But if you hit a solid object head on at even 20 mph you will die. So not sure how much slowing down will help.
-
12-30-2013, 04:18 PM #97Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Mostly in a bad dream
- Posts
- 562
-
12-30-2013, 06:07 PM #98Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
-
12-30-2013, 06:31 PM #99
-
12-30-2013, 07:12 PM #100Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
Bookmarks