Check Out Our Shop
Page 51 of 51 FirstFirst ... 46 47 48 49 50 51
Results 1,251 to 1,267 of 1267

Thread: Praxis Protest..just how cool is it?

  1. #1251
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    250
    Quote Originally Posted by bry View Post
    If it's the new protest rocker pressed beginning last season, imo go on the line.

    Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
    Yeah, these are the new rocker. I think you are right. Happy to be a data point.

  2. #1252
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    740
    I had some of the previous gen mounted -2 and liked them but could've bumped up a hair. Last season I skied a -1 build (118 under foot) with the new rocker mounted on the line (-8,) and they're smokin'.

    Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

  3. #1253
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    250
    Quote Originally Posted by bry View Post
    I had some of the previous gen mounted -2 and liked them but could've bumped up a hair. Last season I skied a -1 build (118 under foot) with the new rocker mounted on the line (-8,) and they're smokin'.
    Thanks. Maybe I just throw the P15s on the line and take it from there.

    Too early to be this excited. I'll try to post some pics later in the week.

  4. #1254
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    3,252
    IMO if you’re buying a ski like the protest going back of the line doesn’t makes sense. The ski is meant to be loose and slarvy. Going back makes the ski feel weird. I have a pair that is a proto type with full reverse camber and the original mount was -1.5. They felt totally off and out was hard to control the tips. It’s a super fat ski, so there’s no need to go back for float. I’d recommend putting them on the line and enjoy the loose feel. It is designed to be like a spatula without the weird skis go in opposite directions that the full reverse sidecut do if not super balanced.

  5. #1255
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,684
    Quote Originally Posted by altacoup View Post
    IMO if you’re buying a ski like the protest going back of the line doesn’t makes sense. The ski is meant to be loose and slarvy. Going back makes the ski feel weird. I have a pair that is a proto type with full reverse camber and the original mount was -1.5. They felt totally off and out was hard to control the tips. It’s a super fat ski, so there’s no need to go back for float. I’d recommend putting them on the line and enjoy the loose feel. It is designed to be like a spatula without the weird skis go in opposite directions that the full reverse sidecut do if not super balanced.
    I wish I mounted the pair I had on the line. I think I went ~1.5 back and they felt the way you described compared to my other powder skis, too much tip and float from the tip vs the middle of the ski. I went back to back with 186 Chipotle Bananas (mounted -.75cm from the line, -6 from center) and was instantly skiing a lot better and I felt more in control.

  6. #1256
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Land of the Long Flat Vowel
    Posts
    1,206
    10+ years on the line, and never a moment of regret.

    (Edit: 6'1 x 165. Trad style, and just want to go fast. Boots Nordica Speedmachines, then Maestrales and Cochise 110 and 130. BSL 325)
    Last edited by Island Bay; 10-01-2024 at 11:07 AM.

  7. #1257
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,470
    Quote Originally Posted by Self Jupiter View Post
    I wish I mounted the pair I had on the line. I think I went ~1.5 back and they felt the way you described compared to my other powder skis, too much tip and float from the tip vs the middle of the ski. I went back to back with 186 Chipotle Bananas (mounted -.75cm from the line, -6 from center) and was instantly skiing a lot better and I felt more in control.
    Interesting. I have my now 192 4 flex -1.5 and have none of the bad characteristics you mention. Full auto pilot, so drifty and balanced. Pivot machines in trees. My 188’s are also back, -1 and are super intuitive there. Maybe boot lean plays a role? Ive skied them on the line and didn’t like how I felt I had to weight the instep or even a little towards the heel. Now I can weight the ball in my proper athletic stance. Loved the spat on the line but that was/is a different shape. Been on this shape for a very long time, they rule pow!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #1258
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,684
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    Interesting. I have my now 192 4 flex -1.5 and have none of the bad characteristics you mention. Full auto pilot, so drifty and balanced. Pivot machines in trees. My 188’s are also back, -1 and are super intuitive there. Maybe boot lean plays a role? Ive skied them on the line and didn’t like how I felt I had to weight the instep or even a little towards the heel. Now I can weight the ball in my proper athletic stance. Loved the spat on the line but that was/is a different shape. Been on this shape for a very long time, they rule pow!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    It is interesting. Could be boot lean, feels like I set up my boots more to be upright every year. I think body type plays a role as well and I’m shorter, lighter and less strong than you are at 5’7’’ ~165lbs. I’ve noticed taller or stronger guys with a more traditional (and perhaps just better) ski style and technique tend to be cooler with more tip in powder than shorter dudes like me.

    I also think it comes down to what skis you’re used to skiing. Gone for me are the days where I switch from a -10cm traditionally mounted daily driver to a more modern mount point powder ski. All of my skis are mounted around -6cm from center and have similar balance points. I hardly feel the tail in a negative way anymore and I only long for more shovel or tip on skis that are shorter than I’m used to skiing. But now it takes me a few runs to get used to a more traditional ski, especially in soft snow.

  9. #1259
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    7B Idaho
    Posts
    1,029
    I think boot forward lean, ramp angle of the binding, and notably BSL all play a role.

    Some of the average size dudes on here have jammed their feet into i.e. 290mm BSL plug boots. My alpine boots are about 350mm. If we both mount "on the line" then my toe and ball of foot is 3cm more forward but per "the line" we have mounted the same!?! I think we would all agree we control the ski more from the ball of the foot than the arbitrary midsole mark on the boot.

    I'm always 1.5-2cm back on Praxis mounts for them to feel good.

  10. #1260
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    SE AK
    Posts
    328

    -1 build

    <p>
    Heyyy Bry- you still loving the -1 build (118 underfoot)? I know the WooTest conversation has been had many times; I don&#39;t see it as a current option on the Praxis site. The slightly fatter -1 build protest is honestly a little more what I&#39;m looking for. I&#39;m probably looking at a 192, flex 4/4+, enduro+carbon build. Also, somewhere, someone recommended a Lithic ski as a solid alternative. Lithic doesn&#39;t seem to be around anymore, but if anyone else is aware of a skinny protest type ski, I&#39;m open to suggestions.</p>
    "Nothing like a very, very amorous woman in a leg imobilizer who dozes off every 3 1/2 minutes."
    -Notchtop

  11. #1261
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    740
    Yessir, I had an amazing spring on them last season, they're near frictionless, the smidge of camber is nice, and the 4 flex is perfect combined with the HH core. The new generation's tip rocker is great. I got in over 20 days between April and June on 118s most days with the best days on the Protests.

    Email Keith see what he says.

  12. #1262
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,684

    Praxis Protest..just how cool is it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Horu View Post
    Heyyy Bry- you still loving the -1 build (118 underfoot)? I know the WooTest conversation has been had many times; I don't see it as a current option on the Praxis site. The slightly fatter -1 build protest is honestly a little more what I'm looking for. I'm probably looking at a 192, flex 4/4+, enduro+carbon build. Also, somewhere, someone recommended a Lithic ski as a solid alternative. Lithic doesn't seem to be around anymore, but if anyone else is aware of a skinny protest type ski, I'm open to suggestions.
    I preferred OG 4FRNT Renegades or Moment Chipotle Bananas to some older protests I tried out. In hindsight I wish I was able to move the mount point a little forward on the Protests. Some generations of the 4FRNT Inthayne are a lighter 118 uf full reverse ski that might be worth checking out too.

  13. #1263
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,013
    After not skiing on my Protests for...13 months, I took them out today on a 2inch-ish "pow" day. (For reference, I've owned Chipotle Bananas...still need to try Renegades, but expect I would love these too, as I dig the 190 Ravens...)

    And holy shit: the Protests are the best fucking pow ski - jeebus are they fun!! Might have to sell off my C132s, which I've never totally fallen in love with, and get a touring layup Protest. These things are so good in non-pow, and then in pow....I've not skied anything that comes close.

    One of only two skis that is a true cold dead hand ski for me, the other being a 12/13 Moment Bibby, which I skied into oblivion.
    sproing!

  14. #1264
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    331
    just curious for those that are saying the new rocker profile protest should be mounted on or closer to the line... what about the new profile makes you say that? The new profile definitely has a more abrubt rise in the tip rocker and possibly a less deep rocker line in tail. That is comparing to my 188s however, not the older 187 profile.

  15. #1265
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    740
    Unstoppable

    Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

  16. #1266
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Whitefish
    Posts
    35
    Moving this over from them general Praxis thread.
    Mystery Protests from FB marketplace showed up. I reviewed them with Keith, he thinks they are the newer 187 version based on the straight pull lenght of 185.5 and a custom full rocker lay up.
    Not exactly what I was looking for but they are in great condition and were cheap. Going to mount them with Attack Demos this week. If the snow cooperates I&#39;ll try them out soon.
    They should be fun and give me enough info to decide if I want to spring for a new set with camber.
    I can&#39;t get pics to post here. See if these imgur links work.
    https://i.imgur.com/eu4MJmT.jpg
    https://i.imgur.com/bBP6ScP.jpg
    https://i.imgur.com/TMEhBqk.jpg

  17. #1267
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    250
    Links won't open for me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •