Page 35 of 50 FirstFirst ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ... LastLast
Results 851 to 875 of 1240
  1. #851
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    9,979
    Quote Originally Posted by skibrd View Post
    If I get another pair of Protests, I’d go CCR.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Might as well just do Powder Boards. At least that was Keiths recco when I was building my Protest and asked about CCR. That tiny bit of camber, i would be fine with flat camber, and side cut makes them more versatile.

  2. #852
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    621
    PSA: Not sure if anyone's shared this yet but just came across these at GT

    https://www.geartrade.com/item/67226...-tabke-protest

  3. #853
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    621
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    Might as well just do Powder Boards. At least that was Keiths recco when I was building my Protest and asked about CCR. That tiny bit of camber, I would be fine with flat camber, and side cut makes them more versatile.
    Yeah don't think I'd wanna go full CCR either, was thinking flat underfoot like my pair of 188s. Maybe it wouldn't make much of difference with the current shape anywhoo. Wonder if that's still an option for the spring custom sale though?

    (here's the 188s for reference)

    Name:  protest 1.jpg
Views: 1366
Size:  164.7 KB
    Name:  protest 2.jpg
Views: 1415
Size:  150.9 KB

  4. #854
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Dirty E
    Posts
    1,047
    Skied my 187 Protests in the Crystal WA all-time powder this weekend and they are bar-none the best pow ski I've ever been on. They are magnificent!

    Bonus in pic are my buddy's 184 flex 3 FRD and some fun Praxis poles.

    Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

  5. #855
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,226
    I'm looking to accentuate the top end of my quiver currently occupied by 187 protests in stock flex. Considering going to 192's as a more Cat ski/epic inbounds setup. For people who have skied both lengths: differences? FWIW I'm 6'2 195# and getting a little chargier every season but don't often drop much.

  6. #856
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by Huskydoc View Post
    I'm looking to accentuate the top end of my quiver currently occupied by 187 protests in stock flex. Considering going to 192's as a more Cat ski/epic inbounds setup. For people who have skied both lengths: differences? FWIW I'm 6'2 195# and getting a little chargier every season but don't often drop much.
    I've only skied the 192, but at 6' 165# I'm happy on that length. Could possibly arrange a demo if you're a ~305 BSL.

  7. #857
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Huskydoc View Post
    I'm looking to accentuate the top end of my quiver currently occupied by 187 protests in stock flex. Considering going to 192's as a more Cat ski/epic inbounds setup. For people who have skied both lengths: differences? FWIW I'm 6'2 195# and getting a little chargier every season but don't often drop much.
    If you dont already have a line on a pair, let me know: https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...ht=192+protest

    Absolutely a killer ski on the one cat day i had on them. I am about the same size as you and think they are the perfect size... if i was only maching open bowls all the time and sending bigger drops id probably rather have the 196, but the 192s killed it everywhere.

  8. #858
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,342
    Quote Originally Posted by Huskydoc View Post
    I'm looking to accentuate the top end of my quiver currently occupied by 187 protests in stock flex. Considering going to 192's as a more Cat ski/epic inbounds setup. For people who have skied both lengths: differences? FWIW I'm 6'2 195# and getting a little chargier every season but don't often drop much.
    We are similar size, I’ve had two pairs of 196s, and I’d go down to the 192s if I got another pair. The 196s were great, just big.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #859
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,349
    If anyone is considering selling an UL pair I'm probably interested.

  10. #860
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    girdwood
    Posts
    489
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    If you dont already have a line on a pair, let me know: https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...ht=192+protest

    Absolutely a killer ski on the one cat day i had on them. I am about the same size as you and think they are the perfect size... if i was only maching open bowls all the time and sending bigger drops id probably rather have the 196, but the 192s killed it everywhere.
    I'm 6', 185 and completely agree.

  11. #861
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,907
    I'm about the same size as y'all (and have bought one or two (?) pairs from STLHD) - 6', 195. I have the 187 stock flex carbon for touring, and absolutely love them. I'd imagine the 192 would be perfect for a resort ski length. Buddy the same size as them has the 196 for resorts, and loves them too.

    Another buddy has the 192 UL for touring...and guess what...he fucking loves them.

    Why you selling Cali-Grown? YOU DON'T LOVE THEM?!?!????
    sproing!

  12. #862
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,926
    Quote Originally Posted by meter-man View Post

    Why you selling Cali-Grown? YOU DON'T LOVE THEM?!?!????
    Haha i just never really meshed with them at my home mountain (Alpental). They are easily the best ski in my quiver for bigger mountains, or for catskiing ( and i want to emphasize how good they were and made me ski when catskiing)... but i just didn't jive with them for the terrain and conditions i would mostly ski them on (tight, techy, dense snow where i rarely get to let them run)... so i decided to pass them along before they got beat up from their life of 2 laps and back to the car on pow days.

    Also, have some personal stuff happening which makes thinning the quiver a good idea. OG 191 Billygoats will continue their decade of service as my pow skis.

  13. #863
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    621
    Quote Originally Posted by Huskydoc View Post
    I'm looking to accentuate the top end of my quiver currently occupied by 187 protests in stock flex. Considering going to 192's as a more Cat ski/epic inbounds setup. For people who have skied both lengths: differences? FWIW I'm 6'2 195# and getting a little chargier every season but don't often drop much.
    I'm 6'0 190 or so and have the OG 188's. Never wanted for a longer ski although I've never used them up in big steep open terrain. I'd say if you ride a lot of trees or similar stuff, stay with the 187s
    Last edited by lrn2swim; 02-01-2021 at 09:22 PM.

  14. #864
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    7,273
    Quote Originally Posted by Huskydoc View Post
    I'm looking to accentuate the top end of my quiver currently occupied by 187 protests in stock flex. Considering going to 192's as a more Cat ski/epic inbounds setup. For people who have skied both lengths: differences? FWIW I'm 6'2 195# and getting a little chargier every season but don't often drop much.
    So I am 6-3 195. So same and am skiing pretty aggressive but also more finesse than brute strength. Had 187. Just a little small and under gunner in 2 feet. Went to Stock flex 192 and it’s amazing. Rips pow and trees and carved rails. Very good swing weight.

    So listen carefully. Put down the app and buy the protests. Don’t pass go, do not collect $200. PM the guy and if his BSL or hole conflict works and buy them.

    I have skied a lot of skis. Still have a quiver. If had to sell most of them I would likely end up with protest, billy goat and rustler 11.

    If you want more in depth send a PM and happy to provide more details or answer questions.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1612225856.733652.jpg 
Views:	100 
Size:	1.26 MB 
ID:	360830

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1612225882.779089.jpg 
Views:	106 
Size:	194.9 KB 
ID:	360831

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1612225898.013513.jpg 
Views:	102 
Size:	216.8 KB 
ID:	360832


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    So after 15 years we finally made it to Utah.....


    Thanks BCSAR and POWMOW Ski Patrol for rescues

    8, 17, 13, 18, 16, 18, 20, 19, 16, 24, 32, 35

    2021/2022 (13/15)

  15. #865
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,984
    Me: Tahoe tele skier. 150-ish lbs. I’m thinking about replacing my old bibby’s because I figure they’re loosing their pop. Pretty sure they’re pine core ones (first jack and jill graphic). How would these do as a sloppy seconds resort ski? That’s a common fun use of the bibby’s that I love.

    Long ago, I used lightranger’s ccr “hybrids” for several powder days. Super (mind blowing) fun, but I never got time on them in sloppy seconds type snow.

  16. #866
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,907
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    Me: Tahoe tele skier. 150-ish lbs. I’m thinking about replacing my old bibby’s because I figure they’re loosing their pop. Pretty sure they’re pine core ones (first jack and jill graphic). How would these do as a sloppy seconds resort ski? That’s a common fun use of the bibby’s that I love.

    Long ago, I used lightranger’s ccr “hybrids” for several powder days. Super (mind blowing) fun, but I never got time on them in sloppy seconds type snow.
    Bibbys rule in chop and crud; Protests are miles better in any sort of consistent 3D snow. Both awesome skis. YMMV.... but your mileage is gonna be sweet either way with either of those sticks.
    sproing!

  17. #867
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,712
    Quote Originally Posted by meter-man View Post
    Bibbys rule in chop and crud; Protests are miles better in any sort of consistent 3D snow. Both awesome skis. YMMV.... but your mileage is gonna be sweet either way with either of those sticks.
    Yeah. I own both. Both great skis, but not really substitutes for each other. They do different things.

  18. #868
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ten Mile Vistas
    Posts
    4,027
    Really fucking cool.
    Name:  myKsa9K.jpg
Views: 786
Size:  83.5 KB
    Old's Cool.

  19. #869
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    Me: Tahoe tele skier. 150-ish lbs. I’m thinking about replacing my old bibby’s because I figure they’re loosing their pop. Pretty sure they’re pine core ones (first jack and jill graphic). How would these do as a sloppy seconds resort ski? That’s a common fun use of the bibby’s that I love.

    Long ago, I used lightranger’s ccr “hybrids” for several powder days. Super (mind blowing) fun, but I never got time on them in sloppy seconds type snow.
    For what it's worth, I put away my Protests as soon as everything gets chewed up at the resort and go to Billy goats, which I consider to be largely an equivalent to the Biby pro. Less work, and it makes less sense to be driving around something so substantial if it isn't deep enough to enjoy.

  20. #870
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,984
    Thanks all. I also have l138’s, which I love before things get chewed up. In theory, I put away the l138’s when it starts to get skied out. I’m looking to avoid that trip to the car with the boards to replace my current bibby’s.

  21. #871
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    The protest is not for sloppy seconds. It will demand freshies and punish you for not seeking them out and providing them. Hence why it's my touring rig.

  22. #872
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    774
    Anybody know what a 187 UL veneer layup weighs?

  23. #873
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,716
    At that width itd be around 1lb off of stock

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  24. #874
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,716
    Quote Originally Posted by nickel View Post
    The protest is not for sloppy seconds. It will demand freshies and punish you for not seeking them out and providing them. Hence why it's my touring rig.
    Id think that might depend on the build. My standard build was faultless in chop or wind press apart from the 3 flex. Nothing like it. Still great but i think a 4 flex(at my 170lb weight) heavy hitter with veneer would be stable af anywhere

    Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

  25. #875
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    Wind or rain crusts and variable density pow are a totally different story, it dominates those conditions for sure. Chopped up moguls and such? My knees just can't see it... ymmv.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •