Page 2 of 27 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 655
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Most Rolex's to a watchdork = clueless rube with more money than brains.
    Yet again I agree with CJ.

    These days it makes more sense for me to wear my metal case Suunto full-time, but if I wanted a clean and simple watch I'd go for a white face bell & ross 126.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    here and occasionally there
    Posts
    1,564
    I guess it's what ever you are in to. A girlfriend bought me a sweet Movado a few years ago. I love the watch but I personally would not have spent $1200-$1500 for it.

    Other things, I have no problem spending money on. If watches are what moves you, enjoy.

    Shit, people say to me "you have how many pairs of skis?" or, "Why do you need two cars?"

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,853
    That Bell & Ross 126 is nice-looking, but if I win the lottery I'm headed to the IWC store. Maybe then to the Omega store.

    Hamilton Khaki King for my daily driver. Old Ebel 1911 for dress-up.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    702
    get a suunto

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,081
    I hope the sunnto is better than the watch I had 10 years ago which was too big and not remotely water proof

    Depending on if you get the titanium or not the Casio pathfinder does temp/compass/solar power /sets the time exactly by satelite/everything I need and isn't too big

    For around 200$ which is as much as I am willing to spend on a watch, expensive watches have always been a dissapointment IMO except for my 45$ timex ironman which I rocked until the buttons got hard to push ...wearing out

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The CH
    Posts
    1,465
    When I was a teenager I worked at a high end stereo store. The owner had a real gold Rolex. The top sales guy had one also. A few of the other guys had fake ones. It impressed the customers. One day a customer walked in flashing his steel/gold Rolex. The owner took me to the back and put a gold Rolex on me and told me to grab my skateboard , go out front and flash the watch. Then they sent me out to get everyone coffee. The customer's jaw dropped. He stopped flashing his watch. I still remember how heavy that watch was.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Most Rolex's to a watchdork = clueless rube with more money than brains.
    This is true. Ive known some hard core collectors, and they hate them. They tell me to buy Patek Phillipe, but 15k is out of my range and probably yours. That being said, My explorer has taken some serious abuse, and one day will be a cool gift to my son. I also have a nice omega dynamic i picked up for a grand about 10 yrs ago, probably more now, but for 2k, half the price of a rolex id buy another omega in a heartbeat. You only need one, they last a life time if you get a self winding watch serviced every 5-10 yrs depending on the brand.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    30
    Depending on your price range, a few suggestions:

    Sub $500: Hamilton & Tissot. Both swiss ETA mechanical movements on most watches. Hamilton Khaki King is my daily wear. If you're going on the lower end, Orient (Japanese mechanical) and Seiko make good looking, reliable watches.

    $500-$1000: Christopher Ward is really nice and generally in this price range. You can also find a few MeisterSinger models in that price range, which are interesting watches b/c they are single hand mechanical movements.

    $1000-$1500: Frederique Constant makes great watches in this range that feature in house movements, rare for this price point. You can probably find a few vintage Omegas or Breitlings (maybe) in this price range if you really look.

    If you're interested in Rolex's go here: http://www.network54.com/Forum/207673/

    Those people know their stuff, and you can generally find great deals on vintage pieces (both Rolex and Tudor - I personally prefer the vintage Snowflake Tudor over many Rolex watches)

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    @Cassidy on Reckoning
    Posts
    873
    ^^^^^^ Yes, fake Rolexes work as well and look as good as the real thing. The second hand can sweep different than the real thing but that's not an obvious give away. Got mine from a street vendor in Bangkok. I didn't like how the color of the face matched the strap, or something, and he unscrewed the different pieces from a few different watches in his, umh, "display case", and I had a custom Rolex(r).
    Sometimes pride comes after a fall.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    22,488
    Some Rolexes are really nice. Like not too flashy and overstated. Just simple and beautiful.
    That said, so are a lot of other Swiss watches. Look at the Swiss Army Infantry. It comes it a mechanical too. I think it's about $500.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,247
    My next large watch purchase, if ever, will be a Doxa.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Issaquah
    Posts
    2,058
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    I hope the sunnto is better than the watch I had 10 years ago which was too big and not remotely water proof
    I have the Suunto Core and it has been bulletproof until the main function button quit working after 3 years. I sent it back to Suunto to repair and they sent me a brand new watch back You buy a Rolex as a status piece of Jewelry not as just a timepiece. I think that market especially in this day and age of class warfare is shrinking considerably. My dad has one and he told me he spends over a grand to service it every 4 years or so. I don't know if he was told that by the dealer so they could take his money every few years or if it really needs it. I was playing poker a few weeks ago at the casino and this crazy loose asian dude had the Fred Flintstone style gold nugget Rolex to match his gold nugget jewelry he was wearing. He kept asking me what time it was because he couldn't see the hands on his watch. That kind of tells you all you need to know about the demographic ( with a few exceptions)
    License to kill gophers by the government of the United Nations

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    That Bell & Ross 126 is nice-looking, but if I win the lottery I'm headed to the IWC store. Maybe then to the Omega store.

    Hamilton Khaki King for my daily driver. Old Ebel 1911 for dress-up.
    No way! I'll take you to the Frank Muller store and you will thank me later with my own!

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    11,764
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Most Rolex's to a watchdork = clueless rube with more money than brains.
    So untrue. Easy to believe though, since many morons buy them.

    edit: after a re-read, this looks like a knock on morons, not rolex's. Anyone knocking rolex found an easy target but have never owned one or done the research.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    The Land of Subdued Excitement
    Posts
    5,437
    I'm thinking I would have to be pretty rich spend thousands of dollars on a watch...

    http://www.google.com/webhp?source=s...w=1366&bih=643

    even the "preowned" ones are over 1000 dollars!

    How much gear, how many ski trips, how nice of a car, house, boat, how many toys does one have to have to find the need to spend that much money on a watch? Or do people value a fancy watch more than more useful toys? They don't even have altimeters or any other useful functions...

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Issaquah
    Posts
    2,058
    While we are on this and it seems like there are watch experts on here. Is there a type of movement that is significantly better and why? When you buy a multi thousand dollar watch are you paying for the name? design? movement? materials and what would the ratio be as it applies to cost? I ask because it seems I've had Seiko's that kept as good a time as my TAG Heuer.
    License to kill gophers by the government of the United Nations

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    13,297
    Quote Originally Posted by Ski to Be View Post
    While we are on this and it seems like there are watch experts on here. Is there a type of movement that is significantly better and why? When you buy a multi thousand dollar watch are you paying for the name? design? movement? materials and what would the ratio be as it applies to cost? I ask because it seems I've had Seiko's that kept as good a time as my TAG Heuer.
    Why buy a Porsche when you can have a Volkswagon? The pussy is one reason.

  18. #43
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by commonlaw View Post
    So untrue. Easy to believe though, since many morons buy them.

    edit: after a re-read, this looks like a knock on morons, not rolex's. Anyone knocking rolex found an easy target but have never owned one or done the research.
    I'm not really knocking them only talking about the perception of the brand among a certain segment i.e it's more impressive to those that aren't interested in watches than it is to some of those who are interested in watches (unless it's a vintage one) - and to my mind expensive watches are all about perception.

    With the crackdown on corruption in China there'll perhaps be some seriously good deals on watches out there in the near future

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Cono Este View Post
    No way! I'll take you to the Frank Muller store and you will thank me later with my own!
    What? Seriously? You mad bro?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ski to Be View Post
    While we are on this and it seems like there are watch experts on here. Is there a type of movement that is significantly better and why? When you buy a multi thousand dollar watch are you paying for the name? design? movement? materials and what would the ratio be as it applies to cost? I ask because it seems I've had Seiko's that kept as good a time as my TAG Heuer.
    The best (most accurate) timekeepers are quartz. Everything else is workmanship, aesthetics, materials, and cachet.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Looking down
    Posts
    50,491
    Quote Originally Posted by Ski to Be View Post
    While we are on this and it seems like there are watch experts on here. Is there a type of movement that is significantly better and why? When you buy a multi thousand dollar watch are you paying for the name? design? movement? materials and what would the ratio be as it applies to cost? I ask because it seems I've had Seiko's that kept as good a time as my TAG Heuer.
    Right. I had a Seiko I bought in 1981 and kept for fifteen years, and kept perfect time throughout that period. I was working in photo darkrooms a lot then, too, around water and chemicals. Nice looking watch.

    What the hell happened to that damn thing? Probably lost it.

    That said, I'd love to own one of the classic Rolex watches still out there, like the Datejust. Very understated. Very classy. But, I won't. My Swiss Army is just fine at 125 from Sierra Trading Post.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    here and occasionally there
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by Hombre215 View Post
    Depending on your price range, a few suggestions:

    Sub $500: Hamilton & Tissot. Both swiss ETA mechanical movements on most watches. Hamilton Khaki King is my daily wear. If you're going on the lower end, Orient (Japanese mechanical) and Seiko make good looking, reliable watches.

    $500-$1000: Christopher Ward is really nice and generally in this price range. You can also find a few MeisterSinger models in that price range, which are interesting watches b/c they are single hand mechanical movements.

    $1000-$1500: Frederique Constant makes great watches in this range that feature in house movements, rare for this price point. You can probably find a few vintage Omegas or Breitlings (maybe) in this price range if you really look.

    If you're interested in Rolex's go here: http://www.network54.com/Forum/207673/

    Those people know their stuff, and you can generally find great deals on vintage pieces (both Rolex and Tudor - I personally prefer the vintage Snowflake Tudor over many Rolex watches)

    Hombre likes his watches. My dad was a watch guy.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,081
    Quote Originally Posted by mtngirl79 View Post

    How much gear, how many ski trips, how nice of a car, house, boat, how many toys does one have to have to find the need to spend that much money on a watch? Or do people value a fancy watch more than more useful toys? They don't even have altimeters or any other useful functions...
    ^^^ the obvious question

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by Ski to Be View Post
    While we are on this and it seems like there are watch experts on here. Is there a type of movement that is significantly better and why? When you buy a multi thousand dollar watch are you paying for the name? design? movement? materials and what would the ratio be as it applies to cost? I ask because it seems I've had Seiko's that kept as good a time as my TAG Heuer.
    Movement means nothing in the age of quartz digital watches with built-in radio clock receivers. If you work where there is no radio clock transmitter (mariners, pilots, and mining), buy one with GPS time receivers like the new Seiko.

    personally, for outdoor sports, i'd just buy something with an altimeter/barometer/thermometer. for daily wear, an orient or a seiko. for feel good luxury, an omega. for ultra-0.1%, buy a breguet.

    i like the mechanical/automatic watches because i think running without a battery is cool, but you can do better with that money if you want to be practical.

    i don't like rolex's blingy style, so would never get one, but the low-key, practical rolexes (read: no diamond/gold/jeweled faces) are good watches.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,247
    Quote Originally Posted by keipow View Post
    i don't like rolex's blingy style, so would never get one, but the low-key, practical rolexes (read: no diamond/gold/jeweled faces) are good watches.
    Submariner FTW. Love that watch, but I like my IWC Aquatimer better.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    93108
    Posts
    2,774
    Santa brougt me a Luminox...love it.

    All of my "expensive" watches never get worn. I imagine the Luninox will stay on until the band snaps.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •