Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 56
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    798

    Best helmet for touring

    Did a quick search but didn't see what I was looking for and don't want to look through threads all night so here goes:

    Any recommendations on a helmet for touring? Not a mountaineering helmet necessarily/probably, just a helmet for my head on the downhills and my pack on the uphills. Criteria:

    -Lightweight
    -Earpads that DONT FALL OUT when strapped to a pack, transitions, on your head, etc. Every helmet I've had, the ear pads strip within a few months and I have to tape them on, and they fall out repeatedly when strapped to my pack.
    - Decent looking to be seen wearing in the resort

    Recs?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,364
    Giro Montane if it fits

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Aspen, Colorado
    Posts
    2,645
    I'd buy a helmet which is constructed like a bike helmet. Foam and a light plastic skin. I use my old fuse (breathable) and my Smith Variant, which I think is heavier. I have not had a problem with earpads falling out.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Too Far South
    Posts
    5,269
    I just use an old Giro nine.9 pull the earpads out and use a lightweight skullcap under the helmet. Keeps my ears nice and toasty and I don't have to worry about losing the earpads.
    For sure, you have to be lost to find a place that can't be found, elseways everyone would know where it was

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,593
    Giro Nine here for bc brain bucket duties.
    watch out for snakes

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Chamonix
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Jethro View Post
    I'd buy a helmet which is constructed like a bike helmet.
    True. My Giro Shiv is lighter than my Petzl climbing helmet.

    A beanie is lighter than a helmet though. Just saying.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,000
    Check out the Smith Maze. I think it might be one of the lightest helmets on the market, has some cool graphics, and the ear pads are solid. Buy fit first of course.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,216
    Poc synapse. Pricey, but very nice.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    30mins from the bush
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by Conundrum View Post
    Check out the Smith Maze. I think it might be one of the lightest helmets on the market, has some cool graphics, and the ear pads are solid. Buy fit first of course.
    +1 love mine

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake City/New Hampshire
    Posts
    966
    POC skull light. Lighter and lower profile than the synapse. Best helmet out there for everywhere imo.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,558
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Giro Montane if it fits
    Insanely lightweight and outfitted with a carabineer and our new trip clip for hooking your lid to your pack, the Montane is up to backcountry missions and inbounds operations alike. Progressive Stack Ventilation delivers fog-free goggles no matter how your day shapes up.
    Can't really argue with that kind of marketing copy.

    It's got it's own motherfucking carabineer!

    Oh and you could try sending Rog a PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    330
    Giro G10. Looks good, and the earmuffs don't fall out. Straps to a pack pretty well too.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,597
    Quote Originally Posted by esales09 View Post
    POC skull light. Lighter and lower profile than the synapse. Best helmet out there for everywhere imo.
    From the POC website, Synapsis is 390g and Skull Light is 500g.

    Edit: And for comparison, Montane is 380g. Maze is 330g.

    I'm looking for the same thing as well, so I'll prolly go try on the Montane, Synapsis, and Maze.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Pleasuretown
    Posts
    1,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Conundrum View Post
    Check out the Smith Maze. I think it might be one of the lightest helmets on the market, has some cool graphics, and the ear pads are solid. Buy fit first of course.
    Another vote for the Maze. It is surprisingly light, yet solid. Smith backs up their products, and it isn't outrageously expensive. But, as with any helmet, make sure it fits first. It is trimmed down, and doesn't have the adjustment mechanisms that lots of helmets have.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake City/New Hampshire
    Posts
    966
    From the POC website, Synapsis is 390g and Skull Light is 500g.

    Edit: And for comparison, Montane is 380g. Maze is 330g.

    I'm looking for the same thing as well, so I'll prolly go try on the Montane, Synapsis, and Maze.
    Interesting. I guess the fact that I'm comparing my brothers Synapsis and GFs skull light is probably not helping me get an accurate number. Anyways thanks for the clarification.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    Posts
    536
    I'd give the Smith Vantage a try too. Nearly as light as a Maze with the venting of the Variant. The vents are also front/back vs the Variant's left/right. My ear pads never fell out with a full season's use.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Behind the Potato Curtain
    Posts
    4,047
    Quote Originally Posted by davieboot View Post
    Another vote for the Maze. It is surprisingly light, yet solid. Smith backs up their products, and it isn't outrageously expensive. But, as with any helmet, make sure it fits first. It is trimmed down, and doesn't have the adjustment mechanisms that lots of helmets have.
    3rded. Super light, don't notice on my pack when touring.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,216
    Quote Originally Posted by esales09 View Post
    Interesting. I guess the fact that I'm comparing my brothers Synapsis and GFs skull light is probably not helping me get an accurate number. Anyways thanks for the clarification.
    Plus, the skull light doesn't have that pimpin' visor.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7,167
    helmets for skiing are fucking ghey

    pm me for more.

    rog

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,990
    I'm also in need for helmet replacement. padding to my old (mid 90's) boeri chopper is dead. i generally like minimal. aesthetically, i like the looks of low coverage paddling helmets, which are similar looking to my current ski helmet. are there any ski helmets like this? what's the diff in the safety certs? how does this compare to certs for climbing helmets? i remember a few years back seeing advertised computer drawings of a light weight helmet with full-ish coverage where the sides would fold for storing and packing in a pack. this perked the interest of a few canyoneering-types that i know. anybody heard of these? did they come to fruition?

    cheers

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,241
    +1 on the beanie

    I wear a helmet inbounds because I have to ski with others. OB, I'm less concerned with needing a helmet.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    4,713
    Quote Originally Posted by acinpdx View Post
    +1 on the beanie

    I wear a helmet inbounds because I have to ski with others. OB, I'm less concerned with needing a helmet.
    My choice is to bring a helmet on most tours because injury consequences in the bc are orders of magnitude more complex.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    7,167
    don't get injured in the bc cat^^^^^^^^makes life much easier and is more funerer.

    ski, don't fall. ain't that hard. injury consequences are higher in the bc, so ski that way.

    beanie, ball cap, visor, they worked for eons before helmets, still do.

    hi

    rog

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    4,713
    I definitely do modify my skiing style in the BC. Concerns me how many people do not, but that is their choice until I am around and need to help them evac. Done it once and it was a hell of a lot of work.

    That being said, one of the great things about the bc is being to hit lines that just are not available in bounds. Falling on these lines could have real consequences.

    Wearing or not wearing a helmet is a personal choice. I do not mean to start a debate, just wanted to put in the alternative thought to the beanie.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    2,769
    I'm with rog on this one, helmuts are ghey. For cereal who gets a head injury skiing boot deep blower on a 20 degree slope anyway.
    I don't work and I don't save, desperate women pay my way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •