Results 26 to 50 of 139
-
06-04-2012, 11:51 AM #26Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
disagree 100%. if ya ain't makin it look ez and in total control, you ain't doin it right. takes years and years of practice in all snow types/terrain to develope a truly solid adaptative skiing technique. most folks these days focus on the newest protective gear/gadgets/helmets etc, and not learning how to ski properly/safely in the 1st place. focussing on the falling is the new. focussing on being a better skier is the old. put that in yer pipe and smoke it dork boy
rog
-
06-04-2012, 11:56 AM #27Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
in my case, a little bi-polar bear. brunette
southside swells? rocks looked ok but pretty much storm surf elsewhere. this has been a good storm...a lot of sand has moved around from this one and stairs ripped away into the ocean.
new truck?
rog
-
06-04-2012, 12:18 PM #28
-
06-04-2012, 02:05 PM #29
-
06-04-2012, 02:15 PM #30trenchman
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 4,547
pretty fucking simple till it's not.
maybe a little signage and some proactive flushing is in order for those chutes.
blunt force trauma is trickier to control.
those are my ideas for change
bobby
-
06-04-2012, 02:41 PM #31Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
ideas for change? meh, death works just fine. always has, always will. people die, other people listen, till they get dumb again..........and so on......
rog
-
06-04-2012, 05:28 PM #32trenchman
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 4,547
see rog that is not change
that idea is the same old same old
how bout another idea rog might like,
cattle wire strung up oneside down the other, voltage set high enough to deter but not enough to kill. for rogs' sake they dont have to post signage, let ole darwin get the message out.
just another idea
bobbyf
-
06-04-2012, 05:32 PM #33Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
now you are just complicating things bobby. but complicating things is the world we live in. fall for it or don't, i don't.
rog
-
06-04-2012, 06:07 PM #34Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 2,835
-
06-04-2012, 06:49 PM #35Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- in ewe
- Posts
- 1,285
We should all wear shock collars and little GPS units, whenever a skier steps out of bounds or into a closed area they get shocked.
-
06-04-2012, 07:34 PM #36Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
How many people... Do not think TGR posters.... but every day people, kids, teenagers, vacation skiers heard about this story? Then how many followed up, figured out where this happened, and how they could avoid the same predicament themselves? How many will remember it the next time they go skiing? How many would be able to apply knowledge of this accident at Vail to a different resort with different topography?
I have never skied at Vail, so I have no idea how "stupid" what these kids did was, but what is the harm in a sign?
I do wish that the grieving loved ones of these deaths.. this one, the winter park death, and those like them would focus their energy on promoting avalanche education in the memory of their lost family member...
Do mountain towns have avalanche education in schools? It would be really great if they did... sounds like a good project.. lots of Avy savy people here... is there a program that goes into the high schools or Jr high schools and spends an hour or two talking to them about avalanches?
-
06-04-2012, 07:41 PM #37Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
yer potentially opening up a can o worms there mtngirl. how bout we talk about you and me
or has leroy sparked your interest? no matter, how bout it?
rog
-
06-04-2012, 07:54 PM #38Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
-
06-04-2012, 08:47 PM #39Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
-
06-04-2012, 09:32 PM #40trenchman
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 4,547
young lady it is not the towns responsibility to evoke mandatory mtn. safety on it's youth.
-
06-04-2012, 10:04 PM #41Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
for the love of god bobby, don't cock block me. mtngirl is in good hands, don't worry
rog
-
06-04-2012, 10:52 PM #42Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- The Land of Subdued Excitement
- Posts
- 5,437
-
06-04-2012, 11:22 PM #43
-
06-04-2012, 11:39 PM #44
Ski areas in the states have a responsibility to manage access to avalanche terrain within their boundaries. The right or wrong of that is a different issue. If you accept responsibility for mitigating avalanche hazard you must accept responsibility for managing access.
Rule number one of managing access is that you have to forecast for the lowest common denominator. If they can get there and claim ignorance of violating a closure, they will.
That being said, the standard for what constitutes reasonable "access management" varies from place to place. I'm not super familiar with vail because it sucks.
Don't know to what degree the parties concerned may have been aware they were pushing the envelope of what was open. It is not uncommon for ski areas to post "no hiking above traverse" or "no uphill" travel signage near gates. It sucks to have to do that but that is what the lowest common denominator requires.
Bunion highlighted the idea that this sort of in-bounds avy hazard is unusual for vail. Blurred says that shit always flushes and it's a permanently closed area. One would think that VRI would have the resources to pay someone to expect the unexpected. Avalanche forecasters are pretty cheap compared to quads.
An in-bounds avalanche accident is my worst nightmare so i focus on that problem intensely.
Perhaps that makes it easier to point the finger of complacency. Sorry, throwing stones is bad form. It sucks that another guy that loved skiing pow died. We need people like that to live and spread the gospel.
Ski areas can not and should not shoulder all of the burden. Personal responsibility needs to be a cornerstone of risk management. With respect to avalanche hazard, I think the Forest Service and the the law has done a good job of upholding that principle...so far.
-
06-05-2012, 02:37 AM #45
may have been mentioned allready,but...NO UPHILL HIKING signs seem to work well at the bird & alta;placed along traverses,near tempting areas.
ski paintingshttp://michael-cuozzo.fineartamerica.com" horror has a face; you must make a friend of horror...horror and moral terror.. are your friends...if not, they are enemies to be feared...the horror"....col Kurtz
-
06-05-2012, 02:19 PM #46
-
06-05-2012, 03:11 PM #47__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
"We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats
"I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso
Cisco and his wife are fragile idiots who breed morons.
-
06-05-2012, 03:19 PM #48
They cost about $12.00 each when you buy them by the dozen, cost little to nothing to maintain and lets face it, if you do not put them out, people take the "it is easier asking for forgiveness in the wake of their transgressions" if a sign isn't present. Not saying such a sign would have prevented this incident, but it would really make the Risk Manager for VA's life much easier.
This is from a Patrol Director who despises unnecessary signs and ropelines.
In the case of Silverton you generally speaking have a pretty avalanche savvy clientele, at Vail you have a mainly Fazutin clientele.I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
-
06-05-2012, 04:36 PM #49Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 425
saying they are going to make changes would basically be an admission of guilt, and would probably fuck them over in court
its terrible that the kid died, but skiing is dangerous and people make mistakes in the mountains and die sometimes. no mountain in the world can mark every tree/rock/slidepath. and there will always be idiots looking for a gap in the ropes, where it 'didnt say it was closed.' at some point people need to use their own judgement
the kids made a mistake by hiking uphill and a shitty thing happened. RIP little dude
-
06-05-2012, 07:45 PM #50Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 7,167
Bookmarks