Results 1 to 18 of 18
-
02-26-2012, 10:50 AM #1
Dynafit speed radical vs radical ST
I have done a bunch of searching but can't seem to find a definitive answer. Is the speed radical the same binding as the radical ST sans brakes? If there are other difference what they are they?
"Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will..."
-
02-26-2012, 10:54 AM #2
Yes. The st has a few more mil height added due to some plasticy base plate though...
-
02-26-2012, 10:59 AM #3
The toe units are the same, but the Speed Radical doesn't use any baseplate while the ST does. The heel units are slightly different and the Speed baseplate is more minimal (and can't take brakes).
-
02-26-2012, 04:50 PM #4Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Colorado
- Posts
- 3,007
IIRC the speed requires a tighter heel clearance (4mm instead of 6mm). Could be mistaken and thinking of the vertical line though.
"High risers are for people with fused ankles, jongs and dudes who are too fat to see their dick or touch their toes.
Prove me wrong."
-I've seen black diamonds!
throughpolarizedeyes.com
-
02-26-2012, 04:57 PM #5
The speed does not have the plastic baseplates in both the toe and heel. This means 2 things:
-lower height without the plastic
-less ski-to-binding contact without the larger plastic baseplate, which can make it weirder controlling very big skis.
Plus the no brakes thing.Skiing, whether you're in Wisconsin or the Alps, is a dumbass hick country sport that takes place in the middle of winter on a mountain at the end of a dirt road.
-Glen Plake
-
02-26-2012, 06:03 PM #6
Thanks for the info. Pretty good sales right now and am ready to pull the trigger!
"Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will..."
-
02-27-2012, 09:14 AM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- South Lake Tahoe
- Posts
- 3,612
I think the Speed Radical uses the same heel gap as the rest of the Racial series, check other sources such as Wildsnow.com.
-
02-27-2012, 10:38 AM #8
-
02-27-2012, 10:47 AM #9
Anybody know the ramp delta of each?
-
02-29-2012, 05:46 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 35
same binding except for brakes and baseplates. baseplates necessary because the brake unit is thick and they needed to raise the boot up to fit the brake under there. delta is slightly greater on the st. i doubt there will be a noticeable difference driving big skis just because the st has a baseplate.
-
02-29-2012, 07:44 PM #11who turned up da gravity?
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 231
-
03-01-2012, 10:19 AM #12Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- ID
- Posts
- 31
I just mounted up some Speed Radicals on my 192 Voile Drifters (128mm waist). I'm 210 lbs w/o gear, so we'll see how this goes. Hopefully I'll get a day on them this weekend, then I'll report back.
-
03-01-2012, 10:48 AM #13
The floggings will continue until morale improves.
-
03-01-2012, 12:53 PM #14Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Calgary, Alberta
- Posts
- 362
Doesn't the Speed have less BSL adjustment than the ST in the heel piece?
-
03-01-2012, 08:03 PM #15
-
03-12-2012, 01:00 PM #16Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- whitefish
- Posts
- 1,240
I like the look of the radical ST toe and but like my old TLT ST heel. Anyone done the combo?
Or can the toe of the speed radical be paired with the TTT ST heel without creating too much of difference in ramp angle?
-
04-09-2012, 10:13 AM #17Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- ID
- Posts
- 31
I just got back from a 3-day hut trip using speed radicals on my Voile Drifters. Conditions were all over the board: light powder on protected north-facing slopes, unbreakable south-facing crusts, mashed potatoes, and spring corn. The bindings were flawless, very rigid and no prereleases. I ski aggressive, but not extreme. Did a few ~10 ft drops with soft, steep landings with no problems.
With a ski that wide, there was substantial lateral force while going uphill on some icy side-hill skin tracks. While the boot-binding-ski connection was totally solid, it definitely wears on your ankles and knees.
I'm very happy with the performance of the speed radicals on this setup. As mentioned earlier, I weigh about 210, so not your typical rando racer. I was using BD Quadrant boots.
-
04-09-2012, 10:41 AM #18Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 110
I have the Speed Radicals mounted to G3 Zenoxides (105mm). I'm 165lb sans gear, on Skookums, not a pro, nor super agressive, but for what it's worth - they seemed to ski great, are silly light, as mentioned above re: side hill skin tracks - felt super solid. Skied all the junk yesterday, some pow pockets, groomers, wind affected, melt freeze - no compaints from the bindings. Legs are tired though haha
Bookmarks