Results 1 to 25 of 55
Thread: fernie v whitefish
-
11-08-2011, 12:28 PM #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- SLC
- Posts
- 19
fernie v whitefish
Wanting to head north to ski from March 12-15 and have narrowed options down to Fernie and Whitefish. Have never skied either, so would love some feedback on both resorts and towns
-
11-08-2011, 02:02 PM #2
I will guarantee that the Whitefish folk take a defensive stand because their resort used to be called "BIG MOUNTAIN" and really folks it ain't that big.
FERNIE!!! is it!!!!!! and do not think about this again. Whitefish is a great town but I have had numerous encounters where Big Mountain riders took offense because I called them out on their vertical drop. CHILL boys (and girls)
Fernie is in Canada and that makes the trip even more worthwhile - Canadians are just on another level and the environment around them is as well. Fernie is great for ski bummin' and the mountains around the town are Ill-e-O sick - Make sure you have Passport and secondary ID (drivers license), and that your car is clean (inside) before you go. The bigger the boarder crossing the better and be cool, honest, and have an agenda. Mounties (canadian police authority) will inquire about how long you will be staying in Canada, Where, How much money you have, and especially when you are leaving their Primo country. Be nice and Serious head to Fernie - you wont be sorry
Flame away people - HA!
And btw - Tech Talk JONG!
-
11-08-2011, 02:08 PM #3
Do both, they are less then two hours apart! I grew up with Big Mountain as my home hill and skied Fernie every now and again. I live in BC now and ski Fernie more often then I the Big.
Each has it's pluses and minuses for sure, but Fernie has better terrain though less predictable temps. Whitefish is a little more mellow, but more stable temps. Though both tend to get decent snow if either is getting any. Both towns are rad and deserve a night out in each....
Do both.Flying the Bluehouse colors in Western Canada! Let me know if you want some rad skis!!
"He is god of snow; the one called Ullr. Son of Sif, step son of Thor. He is so fierce a bowman and ski-runner that none may contend! He is quite beautiful to look upon and has all the characteristics of a warrior. It is wise to invoke the name of Ullr in duels!"
-The Gylfaginning
-
11-08-2011, 02:11 PM #4
Beer is cheaper in the US.
I don't work and I don't save, desperate women pay my way.
-
11-08-2011, 02:16 PM #5
The two are actually fairly similar, even though they're laid out quite differently. They get similar snow, and they're both full of little stashes that reward someone who takes the time to poke around a bit. Fernie probably has more runs with extended vert, whereas Whitefish has a bit more varied terrain and lots of mini-golf type lines. Fernie has some pretty awesome mountains surrounding it, although you're not going to go wrong with either location for scenery. Both places have some fairly easy access to sidecountry. Lift lines are similar in both places.
In terms of the town, WF gets the nod every day of the week. Fernie's downtown is surprisingly dead - it's much more built up along the highway, which isn't really conducive to bar-hopping. WF is cheaper for an American; the exchange rate sucks for the US right now, and everything costs more in Canuckistan.
-
11-08-2011, 02:22 PM #6
I will agree with Gripen if you have the agenda. Do both because the towns are great and the skiing didn't suck at Big Mountain.
My trip included - Bridger Bowl, Big Sky, Big Mountain, Fernie, Whitewater, Red Mountain, Blackcomb/Whistler, and various Backcountry experiences in between. All the towns were great and the experience was amazing - Most have great breweries and all have a great vibe.
I was able to score quality couch real estate in each town - Have a blast!
-
11-08-2011, 02:26 PM #7Powderhound
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Big Skyyyyy
- Posts
- 148
Holy shit Fernie. There is no question. Whitefish has cheaper beer, but the mountain doesn't hold a candle to Fernie.
-
11-08-2011, 02:47 PM #8
Whitefish is installing a cool, new "Powder Beacon" in their downtown area. A strobe light atop this massive pole will go off anytime they have over 6 inches of fresh.
http://www.nbcmontana.com/news/29615626/detail.html
Downtown Fernie has no such powder beacon.
That should help in your decision."Zee damn fat skis are ruining zee piste !" -Oscar Schevlin
"Hike up your skirt and grow a dick you fucking crybaby" -what Bunion said to Harry at the top of The Headwaters
-
11-08-2011, 04:03 PM #9Face Sharts
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Pemberton
- Posts
- 23
Fernie = BC Bud. But either way, go to Revelstoke and Rogers Pass. Kickinghorse too.
-
11-08-2011, 05:55 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- in ewe
- Posts
- 1,285
If I'm driving into Canada, I'm driving past Fernie and headed up toward kicking horse/Reve/Rogers Pass or heading over to Red/Whitewater. For the life of me I can't understand the obsession with Fernie, it has a really low base elevation so it rains halfway up the hill every pineapple express, there are steep pitches but they're usually icey moguls, and the sidecountry doesn't hold a candle to what Kicking Horse and even Red has to offer.
Don't get me wrong I've had some great runs at Fernie I used to ride there 10-15 days a year, but for my money I'd drive a little farther into BC.
-
11-08-2011, 06:13 PM #11
-
11-08-2011, 06:35 PM #12
i agree with the idea of being flexible. the drive between those two locations couldn't be much more simple and the crossing is less intense than the one between red mountain and spokane. it's about a two hour drive depending on conditions, or maybe longer if you decide to stop and enjoy the local color at some random bar along the route.
if the weather agrees, you should certainly make it an objective to hit fernie. another poster is totally correct about the low base elevation of fernie being a major reason for suck. if the weather gods aren't helping out, then whitefish would be a more reliable choice. fernie always struck me as more of a dramatic layout/terrain situation, but there are lots of exciting options around whitefish mountain resort as well... you've just got to know where to find them because things aren't quite as right in front of you as they are at fernie. whitefish sort of spreads out around lower-lying terrain while fernie is below more impressive-looking peaks. also, another consideration, by that time of the year things around the whitefish sidecountry should be primed and ready to enjoy if you can find somebody to show you around the goods out in the canyon or whatnot.
really, you should be able to hit both without much trouble. whitefish is a much more fun town, imo. but then again, fernie has a tim hortons which is a hudge plus in my estimation. i haven't been back to montana since the medical marijuana thing happened, but i'd imagine that the whole bc bud thing as a primary reason to visit fernie instead of whitefish has been negated. lots of people in both places seemed to be pretty open and free about the devil weed.“Money has never been my god — never.” - The Chief
-
11-08-2011, 06:52 PM #13Flying the Bluehouse colors in Western Canada! Let me know if you want some rad skis!!
"He is god of snow; the one called Ullr. Son of Sif, step son of Thor. He is so fierce a bowman and ski-runner that none may contend! He is quite beautiful to look upon and has all the characteristics of a warrior. It is wise to invoke the name of Ullr in duels!"
-The Gylfaginning
-
11-08-2011, 10:41 PM #14Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- mcflattown
- Posts
- 724
-
11-08-2011, 10:57 PM #15Flying the Bluehouse colors in Western Canada! Let me know if you want some rad skis!!
"He is god of snow; the one called Ullr. Son of Sif, step son of Thor. He is so fierce a bowman and ski-runner that none may contend! He is quite beautiful to look upon and has all the characteristics of a warrior. It is wise to invoke the name of Ullr in duels!"
-The Gylfaginning
-
11-08-2011, 11:21 PM #16Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- mcflattown
- Posts
- 724
-
11-09-2011, 05:10 AM #17Mike Pow
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Between a rock and a soft place. Aberdare and The Brecon Beacons, Wales
- Posts
- 3,201
Ski both as others have recommended.
I prefer Whitefish.
And take a trip to Castle Mtn just down the road in Alberta. You won't be disappointed.
-
11-09-2011, 07:35 AM #18Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Sparwood BC
- Posts
- 255
My wife and I live in Sparwood 30 minutes East of Fernie and ski full time all winter. Two key ingredients are FOG at Whitefish and the new Polar Peak chair at Fernie http://www.skifernie.com/news-and-in...lift-2011.aspx
Last year bowl closures were a big problem at Fernie because too much snow. The new chair will hopefully solve the AC problem so things open sooner.
Best way to express the difference is we go to Whitefish for the shopping and Fernie for the skiing. If you have wheels, as already mentioned you must go to Castle midweek. It is 2 hours East of Fernie through the Crowsnest Pass on the other side of the Continental Divide. Totally different than Fernie with huge steep lines, lighter powder and deserted midweek. Here are some pics from someone going to Castle for the first time. Go to the bottom of the page.
http://www.parkersspace.com/news.php#story30
They also have cheap cat skiing. Our March 11 trip last season
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-QASwg-ZtU
If you are an expert skier Fernie (and Castle) wins, if you are an expert shopper and have infrared vision Whitefish wins.Last edited by Sparwood Dave; 11-09-2011 at 02:00 PM.
-
11-09-2011, 08:32 AM #19
-
11-09-2011, 08:54 AM #20
Never been to Fernie, but WF is sweet (when you can see), mountain and town are laid back good vibe.
-
11-09-2011, 10:39 AM #21Powderhound
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Big Skyyyyy
- Posts
- 148
-
11-09-2011, 11:11 AM #22
um, 3 days? Bud I am sorry to say you won't even have a chance to see what is there. And go for Fernie, its just way better.
-
11-09-2011, 11:32 AM #23
Neither. I would keep driving north to Revelstoke if I's was you's.
-
11-09-2011, 11:51 AM #24Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Calgary, Alberta
- Posts
- 362
I third the motion to check out Castle (if you aren't going to make the journey to the interior). They get some silly pow and the lift lines mid-week are pretty much non-existent unless it's a huge day, but even then it's not bad.
I've had some good days at Fernie, both on-hill and exploring the side-country, but if it rains, it suuuuuucks.
-
11-09-2011, 03:48 PM #25
As its been said you should just do both. Beware that the Cougar population is staggering in Whitefish and can be dangerous!
BC Bud is soooo 90's. Medical marijuana hit Montana and there is no shortage of unbelievable bud that can hold its own with any bud anywhere, anytime.
The drive to Fernie is easy and both places are pretty fun. Take Gripen's advice on the difference between the two as I'm pretty sure he's the only one posting in this thread that has/does ski both places consistently.
Bookmarks