Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: LaSportiva Hi-5

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    6,459

    LaSportiva Hi-5

    Anyone get some time in on the Hi-5 last season?

    http://www.sportiva.com/products/ski/skis/hi5

    Interested to hear more about how this ski feels.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,500
    I'm interested as well. Haven't heard much about it, but there's a few comments here and there at Cold Thistle (http://coldthistle.blogspot.com/).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Amherst, Mass.
    Posts
    4,684

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Crystal Mountain backcountry, WA
    Posts
    1,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan S. View Post
    Pretty worthless review IMHO. Lou's pretty old school and doesn't really like fat skis and according to Lee Lau..just a meadow skipper now!
    TGR Bureau Chief, Greenwater, WA

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Castle Rock ,CO
    Posts
    168
    I have a pair sitting right next to me. I have not skied them yet but I am looking forward to. In a perfect world I think they should have a little less rocker but other then that I think they are the perfect BC ski for me.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Crystal Mountain backcountry, WA
    Posts
    1,359
    ^^^^post a review when you ski them...I'm interested in this ski as well.
    TGR Bureau Chief, Greenwater, WA

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    403
    i skied the Hi5 at the OR demo day last year at solitude and really liked it. pretty easy skiing ski that was buttery smooth. didn't really ski them at high speeds, but it was a pretty predictable ski at moderate speeds.
    Teton AT
    Live to Ski!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    175
    I'm eyeing a pair as well. Jong Q Public, what length did you end up getting? I usually ski a ~180 cm (5'11", 175 lbs) and trying to figure out the effect that the early rise will have. I know that full rocker you can add 5~10 cm... so I'm aiming for the 188 cm.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Castle Rock ,CO
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by Turnipking View Post
    I'm eyeing a pair as well. Jong Q Public, what length did you end up getting? I usually ski a ~180 cm (5'11", 175 lbs) and trying to figure out the effect that the early rise will have. I know that full rocker you can add 5~10 cm... so I'm aiming for the 188 cm.
    188 which is what I would get if I were you. At 450 mm they have quite a bit of rocker

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    6,459
    Hey James can you post up some rocker pics vs Super Turbo's and Trust.

    Fondled a pair of Trusts on Friday night next to some Goliaths. Now very confused of what I want to get...

    Get those Hi-5's out on some firm nasty snow, I don't doubt they'll rock in pow, wondering how they'll do in some bad snow.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Scotsman50 View Post
    Pretty worthless review IMHO. Lou's pretty old school and doesn't really like fat skis and according to Lee Lau..just a meadow skipper now!
    I haven't tried the ski but to clarify I haven't had the chance to ski with Lou. I joke with him about being a meadow skipper - sorry for the confusion. He is a pretty light guy though so take that into account

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Castle Rock ,CO
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by shirk View Post
    Hey James can you post up some rocker pics vs Super Turbo's and Trust.

    Fondled a pair of Trusts on Friday night next to some Goliaths. Now very confused of what I want to get...

    Get those Hi-5's out on some firm nasty snow, I don't doubt they'll rock in pow, wondering how they'll do in some bad snow.
    186 Trust versus 192 Super Turbo




  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    6,459
    I see no Hi-5's there man

    Same rocker as the Super's? Or more like the Trust?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    gunnison valley
    Posts
    758
    /\/\ More like the Fly Swatter tip, with a flat tail. Kind of odd combo appearance wise- I'd have given them a profile closer to the Drifters.
    Quote Originally Posted by dfinn View Post
    A better option would be to quit whining and go ski somewhere with less people around.
    __________________________________________________ __________

    Aclimate Sports Drink- "Go higher feel better"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Castle Rock ,CO
    Posts
    168
    Hi 5, Trust and Super Turbo




  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    out there on the neon avenue
    Posts
    4,030
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    I haven't tried the ski but to clarify I haven't had the chance to ski with Lou. I joke with him about being a meadow skipper - sorry for the confusion. He is a pretty light guy though so take that into account
    doesnt he have fused ankles??? awesome that he does what he does at all. I know that having a basically fused knee relegates me to pretty rudimentary terrain.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Crackertown
    Posts
    201
    I got to ski with Lou for a day up Independence last May/June and he skis fine, I couldn't tell he has a fused ankle. I considered myself lucky to get a chance to tour with him and I'm sure in pow he has no problems.

    I've ordered the Hi5 in 188 to replace the original Coomba's that I sold at the beginning of the season last year and never replaced. Going to try them with a light "race" style binding and my TLT5P's. I feel like I can go anywhere with my Manaslu's but they don't really float.

    And there's times when I don't want to dig a pit and don't want to ski with other people and that's when I go meadow skipping. That's one reason I went for the Hi5 and not the Nunataq, I think full rocker planes out slower, ie requires a degree or two more slope angle to get you going sometimes. When I'm trying to toboggan across some 22 degree meadow I assume the bigger the flat under foot, the more I can get on top.
    Last edited by YB; 11-07-2011 at 08:40 PM. Reason: spelling
    Lucky Thirteen!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Van-groovey
    Posts
    200
    Anyone got (more) time on these? I'm wondering about the torsional strength and/or getting bounced around in crud given the weight.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    81
    Also, can anyone chime in where you mounted the 188 and did you like it there? Thanks!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    39
    Thought I would revive this to see what people's long-term comments on the Hi5s are. There has been some recent discussion in the comments for the Wildsnow article. They have been described as surfy in fresh snow but hooky and unpredictable in variable. They are also soft and have a speed limit. Not many people have been commenting on how they ski, however. How have people found these skis in variable snow conditions now that they have been around a few seasons and people have spent more time on them?
    Last edited by Besniwod; 06-10-2013 at 07:08 AM.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    541
    I've skied them and offered an opinion as well.

    http://coldthistle.blogspot.com/2011...-hi5-skis.html

    Quiver ski imo but depends on your own use.

    Two skis from La Sportiva I really like are the Hang5 and the GTR.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    39
    Thanks. I see your review is from two years ago. Do you have any other comments on how they handle variable snow now that you have been skiing them for another two seasons? How are they on breakable crust?

    Other than speed, what don't they do well?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    541
    I was part of the Wild Snow discussion again recently. My thoughts are there. I found them a stable and quick turning ski with a definative speed limit for me and not in any way hooky as some had offered. They do ski short.

    Breakable crust? You chitting me? What ski does well in breakable crust? I have a dozen fat skis (up to 138s) and prefer something more along the lines of a 115 than a 105 as a dailey. Nasty and real breakable crust? BC makes them all suck. But in general fatter is better there. R/R skis like the Lotus 138 make breakable almost fun. But they weight more.

    I've been skiing a lot on the other La Sportiva skis this winter, along with Dynafit and DPS in my rotations. Hi5 is still a good ski. It has a soft, huge rocker tip and a stiff square tail. For the right skier, in the right conditions , it is a very good ski imo.

    I never really got to ski mine in fresh uncut snow. I did ski it in some pretty terrible and deep conditons and was thrilled with the performance. First fat ski I used very much. Now I don't even consider it a mid fat let alone a FAT ski.

    What kind of skiing do you want the Hi5 for?
    Last edited by Dane1; 06-14-2013 at 10:49 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •