Results 26 to 50 of 50
-
04-15-2011, 01:03 PM #26Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 52
Been here since 1985 and you could not pay me to take a job at the ski area. To much of a corporate shit show... just like being back in the city... f that.
-
04-15-2011, 01:05 PM #27Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 52
Splat we still have some of the MM marketing team posting on TGR...
-
04-15-2011, 01:10 PM #28
Yea, sounds like an HR fuck up. In my 20+ years of work I've dealt with workers comp twice and both time had my hand held by HR or my manager because its their fucking job. They sat me down, on the clock, and we went over the paperwork together long before any deadline.
-
04-15-2011, 01:25 PM #29
This has now been posted in the Mammoth Mountain forums, meaning a more likely response.
"Have you ever seen a monk get wildly fucked by a bunch of teenage girls?" "No" "Then forget the monastery."
"You ever hear of a little show called branded? Arthur Digby Sellers wrote 156 episodes. Not exactly a lightweight." Walter Sobcheck.
"I didn't have a grandfather on the board of some fancy college. Key word being was. Did he touch the Filipino exchange student? Did he not touch the Filipino exchange student? I don't know Brooke, I wasn't there."
-
04-15-2011, 01:34 PM #30
-
04-15-2011, 02:30 PM #31
if she was strapped to a backboard, it seems to me she would be going to the ER before the ink would be dry on any WC paperwork, let alone the insurance carry knew anything about it.
second, you would think if that was the case, MMSA would already have a agreement with the local ER to test any emp. that came in injuried. one the other hand, if someones on a backboard, usually the ER doesn't worry about wether its a WC claim or private insurance. they take care of the pt 1st, and sweat the details later. another thought, if the emp. was injuried enough to require overnight or longer care, why wasn't a urine sample taken at that point? so many ifs and what abouts on this one.
the actions of MMSA stinks like last months leftovers
-
04-15-2011, 04:49 PM #32Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- around the bend
- Posts
- 416
Mammoth patroller has posted on the mammoth forums and claims to know nothing about any incident. Somebody's not telling the truth here.
-
04-15-2011, 05:24 PM #33
Got a link?
-
04-15-2011, 05:29 PM #34Hugh Conway Guest
-
04-15-2011, 05:36 PM #35
http://forums.mammothmountain.com/vi...p?f=14&t=10344
nothing useful there, at least so far. LouReed is a pretty cool kook, and is pretty straight forward. hopefully he may hear something useful, but so far this is all just intertube chatter. Which, of course, does not mean we can't over react and riot in the streets. Mammoth would benefit from a good pillaging and plundering (nothing worth raping, or at least get an STD test first.)
I agree it is a constitutional right for Americans to be assholes...its just too bad that so many take the opportunity...iscariot
-
04-15-2011, 05:38 PM #36
I heard you get the full std q-tip deal for workers comp now.
-
04-15-2011, 05:44 PM #37Hugh Conway Guest
-
04-15-2011, 10:49 PM #38Minion
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 1
Mammoth Patroller has been reinstated.
-
04-15-2011, 11:10 PM #39Hugh Conway Guest
-
04-16-2011, 08:27 AM #40
-
04-16-2011, 06:26 PM #41Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- mammoth
- Posts
- 45
-
04-16-2011, 07:13 PM #42Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- really? You can't guess it?
- Posts
- 703
Read the post at the bottom of this page on the Mammoth forums. I think a certain Canadian ski area could certainly have benefited from an approach like Mammoth's.
-
04-16-2011, 10:04 PM #43
-
04-16-2011, 10:25 PM #44
good on mammoth for doing the right thing. i still hate the fact that companies are ok with signing up for a workers comp plan that knowingly excludes a large number of employees from coverage due to something legal they do while not at work that in no way effects their work.
would that kind of shit fly if they started excluding people because they had a drink 3 days ago?
-
04-17-2011, 08:43 AM #45
When the test is able to show that you smoked pot 3 days ago INSTEAD of 3 hours ago, you might have a point... but people do smoke right before their shift... and on their shift. The choice to get high is a CHOICE. The way the system works is imperfect, but it is no secret.
Originally Posted by blurred
-
04-17-2011, 09:11 AM #46Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Up the Creek
- Posts
- 21
Drug testing for Patrollers? How high do you have to be?
-
04-17-2011, 09:46 AM #47
You do know that most of the hospital's patients probably come from the mountain. In that case it would make sense to have mountain representation on the board. I'm willing to be Dave gave generously to the hospital when he was around also. He subsidized other things around town too. This would also be a legacy of that. Who knows. Just playing devil's advocate.
"I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."
-
04-17-2011, 09:57 AM #48
^^^Sounds like this was resolved. But if it weren't, I highly highly doubt that this would have held up in court. It would have been worth it because IMO, she could have found an attorney who would work for a % with nothing paid up front. She may have also had a case for bad faith, which can pay out several times of actual damages. (know of one specific case in Texas where worker's comp was denied a number of times, delayed, denied after arbitration found in favor of worker and was subsequently awarded $50 million in punitive. Verdict was later reduced in appeal but they still got 7 figures of punitive.
Just because you sign something doesn't mean it is enforceable.
-
04-17-2011, 06:51 PM #49
-
04-18-2011, 07:42 PM #50
Bookmarks