Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 56
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cali-for-ni-a
    Posts
    288

    Truckee Tahoe Aerial Tramway?

    Hey Guys,

    Would be kinda interesting.....I did a quick write up on the idea on www.unofficialsquaw.com and it's thankfully pasted in below:

    An aerial tramway in Tahoe, huh? A tram that goes from Truckee to Tahoe City with branches that reach out to Alpine Meadows and Squaw Valley. It actually sounds pretty cool. Jeff Sparksworth is considering it a reality. Essentially you'd drive your car to Truckee, park it and jump on the tram. Color coded 6-8 person gondolas would take you and your baggage to your specific destination. The idea of the project would be to eliminate the use of cars on highway 89 along with the traffic and congestion they create. The gondolas would move at 20mph taking you from Truckee to Squaw in 18 minutes and Truckee to Tahoe City in 42 minutes. "I know we’re all in an awful hurry these days and at the extremes these times may seem slow. However, when you factor in bad traffic days, the hassles of parking, and the delays caused by traffic accidents or weather, these times are reasonable." (TahoeTram.com) Hell, it also just sounds like a fun ride.

    Advantages of the Tram system:

    No traffic, more environmentally sound then automobiles, cool factor - attractive to tourists and maybe olympics, user cost will be cheap compared to rising automobile user costs and skyrocketing oil prices, minimal snow removal vs. road, and you'll be able to read, work, use the internet (all gondolas will have cell phone coverage & wi-fi) or just hang out vs. driving.

    Disadvantages of the Tram system:

    Basically the tricky part is getting the resources to build the tramway. The estimated cost of the tram would be around $500 million, which is a pretty chunk of change.

    This is a very interesting idea that truly does deserve some serious consideration. TahoeTram.com has much more information including: costs & revenue projections, comparisons to existing tram systems, tram station details, routes & service areas, benefits of the aerial system, and system capacites.

    "If the system could remove 5000 cars for five years, this would be a carbon value of $1,374,000 and an emissions reduction of 55,879,000 lbs." (from TahoeTram.com)
    'on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness.' So I got that goin' for me,....which is nice!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Couloirfornia
    Posts
    8,871
    Interesting idea.

    Would really lend itself to the Olympic pipedream.

    The line up to Norden probably wouldn't ever happen. The line out to Northstar maybe not either. Both for various land-use reasons. Maybe though.

    The rest of it though...

    Definitely interesting. It'd have to be pretty comprehensive though in terms of stations in order for people to use it though. Can't half-ass it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernest_Hemingway View Post
    I realize there is not much hope for a bullfighting forum. I understand that most of you would prefer to discuss the ingredients of jacket fabrics than the ingredients of a brave man. I know nothing of the former. But the latter is made of courage, and skill, and grace in the presence of the possibility of death. If someone could make a jacket of those three things it would no doubt be the most popular and prized item in all of your closets.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    363
    If we're discussing fantasy transportation systems, why not go straight to the USS Enterprise teleporter?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    straight out the nickel & dime
    Posts
    1,209
    could be dope, but I can't imagine how many NIMBYs would pee their pants over a long term project like this...
    imz-design
    industrial design • new product development
    http://www.imz-design.com/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Mammoth
    Posts
    502
    If you french fry when you pizza you're going to have a bad time.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cali-for-ni-a
    Posts
    288
    Monorail...Monorail....Mono!

    Yeah, I suppose it should have included the aesthetic side of things. It's possible that the thing could be a hideous eyesore.
    'on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness.' So I got that goin' for me,....which is nice!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    P-tex, CA
    Posts
    8,663
    A bullet train to Squaw from downtown SF would be much cooler....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    5,777
    A big public transportation project is what the area needs. For jobs and more... If there was decent public transpo in the Truckee Tahoe area, I would use it daily.

    I think a tram might be the wrong idea, but I cannot think of a better idea. Any monorail, maglev, train idea would be more expensive and more impacting. TART has proved to us that bus lines don't work up here.

    It is fairly open too... Routing it right along 89 would work, but routing it a mile or two west of 89 would bring in great vistas of Tinkers and the crest, as well as drop you right in Alpine and Squaw. There is not a whole bunch of private land over there, other than the TTSD and White Wolf, its all Tahoe National Forest.

    Ahhhh White Wolf... I dream of the day Squaw and Alpine grow some balls, partner up, and buy White Wolf, keeping AMs open boundary policy of course.
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ta-hoes Love Face Shots!
    Posts
    2,520
    Quote Originally Posted by skier666 View Post
    A bullet train to Squaw from downtown SF would be much cooler....
    Don't you mean Kirkwood?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Cali-for-ni-a
    Posts
    288
    I just got off the phone with Jeff Sparksworthy, the guy with the tram idea.

    He actually mentioned a monorail and that is/was an option for our area but with a cost of about 20 million/mile. The tram way is in the ballpark of $7-10 million/mile.

    Sparksworth's next step is to start a non-profit organization and begin conducting 3 studies. An Economic, an Environmental Impact, and an Engineering study. These studies will be Sparksworthy's path to validating that his proposed project is viable and will be able to pay for itself once operational.

    He informed me that TRPA, the county board of supervisors, as well as the head of Cal Trans all acknowledge that there is a need for alternative transportation in our area in the future and that this aerial tramway is a possible option.

    If everything went as well as it could, he estimates that there could potentially be ground breaking in 3-5 years and the project could potentially be complete as early as 2021.
    'on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness.' So I got that goin' for me,....which is nice!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by skier666 View Post
    A bullet train to Squaw from downtown SF would be much cooler....
    Most of the track is already in place, for at least light rail... could be really sweet!!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    5,777
    Quote Originally Posted by lodopo View Post
    Most of the track is already in place, for at least light rail... could be really sweet!!
    Amtrak doesn't use that rail, the train station in Truckee is now purely a bus stop. I don't know the reasoning, but I would wager that if amtrak doesn't use it there is no way a bullet train would.
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  13. #13
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    Routing it right along 89 would work,
    Yes, it would. That's where the railway that went from Truckee-Tahoe City ran for over 40 years. Course you'd have to tear up the bike trail

    You can take the California Zephyr to Truckee.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    5,777
    Quote Originally Posted by Gopher View Post

    He actually mentioned a monorail and that is/was an option for our area but with a cost of about 20 million/mile. The tram way is in the ballpark of $7-10 million/mile.

    Sparksworth's next step is to start a non-profit organization and begin conducting 3 studies. An Economic, an Environmental Impact, and an Engineering study. These studies will be Sparksworthy's path to validating that his proposed project is viable and will be able to pay for itself once operational.
    I expect those three studies to show promise!

    We already know its cheaper.

    We could assume it would impact the environment less, being able to span valleys and such.

    Engineering wise, it might be more difficult to design but building a few towers and stringing cable is less work than building piers, bridges, and rail all the way through.
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    bay area
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by Lane Meyer View Post
    Don't you mean Kirkwood?
    See, this highlights the main problem with doing something like this in the Tahoe area: people's origins and destinations in the area are too varying. On any given day, most of the people at the resorts didn't come from Truckee, and the are mountains spread out across the region.

    If there was only one big resort in the area and people either drove in from the bay area or reno, there would definitely be the need for some sort of public transport option at least from RNO.

    Also, visitors that come from the bay area aren't going to drive 3.5 hrs only to load up into a tram to avoid driving the last few miles.

    Lastly, to get something like this to work, Alpine and Squaw would likely have to pony up a decent portion of the costs to build it, and we all know that ain't happening.

    I think it would be awesome to have something like this, but the underlying market conditions/factors just aren't there, unfortunately.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    363
    The thing is, this doesn't even solve the last few miles. How are you going to get an SUV load of people and equipment from the tram stop up to the cabin the are staying in? Taxis? Just how many would you need for the Friday night rush?

    There are very few resorts in Tahoe where the housing density works with this, and where you could put a stop within schlepping distance of accommodations. Might be great for the Squaw village, the condos at Alpine, and Northstar, but most of the rest of the basin is just too decentralized.

    I'm still predicting the Star Trek transporter becoming reality before this.

  17. #17
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mday View Post
    The thing is, this doesn't even solve the last few miles. How are you going to get an SUV load of people and equipment from the tram stop up to the cabin the are staying in? Taxis? Just how many would you need for the Friday night rush?
    ah yes, the classic American problem with public transporation, OMFG I won't be able to fill the Suburban up with crap for a weekend trip! I might have to change my life a little bit.

    Train + Bus + taxis + walking

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Redwood City and Alpine Meadows, CA
    Posts
    8,277
    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    I dream of the day Squaw and Alpine grow some balls, partner up, and buy White Wolf, keeping AMs open boundary policy of course.
    Likewise.

    FWIW, at ISSW, Squaw pro patrol suggested that they are preparing to open boundaries. Probably not this season, though.

    [/drift]
    not counting days 2016-17

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Back in SEA
    Posts
    9,657
    how about a subway system??? Truckee-TahoeCity line, AM/Squaw/N* line, maybe add SugarBowl & Homewood?

    It'd be just like The Tube!!! Mind the Gap and the Gaper Gap at the same time... brilliant!
    ... jfost is really ignorant, he often just needs simple facts laid out for him...

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Back in SEA
    Posts
    9,657
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    ah yes, the classic American problem with public transporation, OMFG I won't be able to fill the Suburban up with crap for a weekend trip! I might have to change my life a little bit.

    Train + Bus + taxis + walking
    ahh yes, the classic European problem of not realizing that Americans don't have 36 vacation days per year and as such cannot waste 2 days simply getting to their ultimate destination.

    Quote Originally Posted by german guy
    Hallo! Taking the train from Munich to Salzburg, then overnighting there, having a wine&cheese fest, then taking another train to Kitzbuehl, having another wine&cheese fest, then maybe going skiing! We will be gone for 7 weeks with the whole family!
    ... jfost is really ignorant, he often just needs simple facts laid out for him...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    16,144
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Train + Bus + taxis + walking
    that's not the issue here, since there is no train. If this made it so people didn't need to bring their car, it would help. but with the current infrastructure you would drive from the bay area to truckee, leave your car, hop on the tram, and then get dropped off to catch a taxi or walk. The taxi uses every bit as much gas as the car you left 20 miles behind, plus it has to drive useless miles en route to pick you up. The taxi still causes traffic problems too. As part of a comprehensive plan, it could be a valuable piece, but by itself, not so much.

  22. #22
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by powdork View Post
    but with the current infrastructure you would drive from the bay area to truckee, leave your car, hop on the tram, and then get dropped off to catch a taxi or walk.
    Huh? Shift some of the slightly-less-time sensitive freight on the UP lines to the Feather River route and route more passenger trains on the Donner Pass lines. Heck have the trains stop at Soda Springs again

    Quote Originally Posted by jfost View Post
    ahh yes, the classic European problem of not realizing that Americans don't have 36 vacation days per year and as such cannot waste 2 days simply getting to their ultimate destination.
    Give Amtrak some priority on their rail routes so they aren't fucked over everytime and you'd fine that the time from Oakland to Truckee could be about the same on the train on a weekend.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Squaw Valley / Las Leñas
    Posts
    478
    Quote Originally Posted by skier666 View Post
    A bullet train to Squaw from downtown SF would be much cooler....
    Full agree on this! Great point...

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,440
    Jet boat ferries up and down the truckee would eliminate the need for any of that cumbersome infrastructure stuff.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    P-tex, CA
    Posts
    8,663
    Some days I could drive to Kirkwood. Then, some days take a cab in my ski boots to the train station, take a nap, and arrive at Squaw....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •