Results 301 to 325 of 668
Thread: Alta is for Nazis
-
01-16-2014, 07:04 AM #301Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,449
-
01-16-2014, 07:18 AM #302
Don't gape on the high t then.
"Steve McQueen's got nothing on me" - Clutch
-
01-16-2014, 10:01 AM #303
nuking popcorn now
watch out for snakes
-
01-16-2014, 08:25 PM #304
-
01-16-2014, 08:58 PM #305observing free range rude
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- below the Broads Fork Twins
- Posts
- 5,772
-
01-17-2014, 12:09 PM #306
-
01-17-2014, 12:41 PM #307
-
04-07-2014, 10:05 PM #308
Just a bump reminder of the douchebag brand of skiers that are beginning a slow death…..in court and not on their terms….you had the chance to do it like Aspen…now you will be nationally fucked…no one cares about your under the table deal with the USFS….
Terje was right.
"We're all kooks to somebody else." -Shelby Menzel
-
04-07-2014, 11:12 PM #309
I honestly don't give a shit about the snowboarders argument, have fun at Alta trying to traverse on a board. I'm a skier, and Alta is a pretty great resort, but seriously, fuck the people there. Nothing pisses me off more than getting there at 8am on a pow day and having 30 pairs of skis in front of you in line and not a single person in sight.
-
04-07-2014, 11:29 PM #310
That is a bullshit rule...
I've never heard of that flying anywhere else. Go ahead and Take a piss, smoke a bowl, roam around and talk with your buddies, but go inside for a Leisurely sit-down breakfast?!! You'd come back and find your skis on fire at most places.
-
04-07-2014, 11:34 PM #311
-
04-08-2014, 09:00 AM #312
-
04-08-2014, 09:08 AM #313Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident
-
04-08-2014, 10:16 AM #314
I like that rule. So I can just stay up late and put my skis out, then go to bed, sleep late, eat breakfast, roll up at 8:55, click in and grab first chair. Cool. Good to know.
Actually, it would be pretty fun putting a snowboard out there.
Honestly, Alta is the las place I would want to snowboard. Way too many flats. But hey, most gumbies are too dim to figure that stuff out. Can you imagine the renal abuse once the traverse lines start looking like fans as they do almost anywhere else.
-
04-08-2014, 10:57 AM #315
-
04-08-2014, 11:12 AM #316
That's what makes your little Tirades so pathetic... Nobody here is "squirming"....that's just you wildly flapping your arms as you try to ride your lunch tray down the slope.
If you actually think the Courts are going to rule in your favor than you're dumber then we ever imagined ...and that's sayin' sumthin'.
I'd even be willing to make a healthy wager with you on the courts decision. $100?
-
04-08-2014, 12:15 PM #317
The whole thing is so stupid
On Sunday we were on supreme until 4:00 and were working back to the front. The traverse from the top of the high speed back to Collins was closed for blasting, so we had to drop down and around the base. About 30-35 minutes skating on skis. That would have been brutal on a board. High traverse would be so bad with intermediate boarders. The flat area between supreme and the base of the high speed would be unbearable on my board. Snow bird has the same terrain and has board access that is so much better. Why have this fight?
I want some of that action as well. Times ten get people fired boy?
-
04-08-2014, 12:22 PM #318
Claim was denied in court, snowboarders could not prove discrimination
http://news.yahoo.com/forest-backs-s...--finance.html
"Even if Plaintiffs established that they are similar to skiers and have been treated differently, they have failed to show that the federal defendants' treatment of them was irrational," Forest Service lawyers wrote.
My favorite part
The Forest Service said it agrees with Alta that the way snowboarders slide down the slopes is a legitimate safety concern for skiers. In a filing last week, Alta attorneys explained that skiers find the slopes at Alta more peaceful, safe and enjoyable because they don't have to worry about being hit by snowboarders whose sideways stance leaves them with a blind spot that can make their wide, sweeping turns a danger to others on the slopes.
"These differences create safety concerns that can be avoided or minimized by not allowing snowboarders," Forest Service lawyers wrote in the new filing.
Alta is one of 120 ski resorts that has a permit to use Forest Service land, the court brief says. The agency's lawyers say they are aware of Alta's snowboarding prohibition but argue the agency was not part of the decision to enact the ban and does not make a profit from it.
Based on a congressionally mandated formula, Alta paid the Forest Service between $305,000 and $474,000 each of the past five years. That represents less than 1 percent of the Forest Service's annual budget, their attorneys said.I need to go to Utah.
Utah?
Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?
So after 15 years we finally made it to Utah.....
Thanks BCSAR and POWMOW Ski Patrol for rescues
8, 17, 13, 18, 16, 18, 20, 19, 16, 24, 32, 35
2021/2022 (13/15)
-
04-08-2014, 12:37 PM #319ski paintingshttp://michael-cuozzo.fineartamerica.com" horror has a face; you must make a friend of horror...horror and moral terror.. are your friends...if not, they are enemies to be feared...the horror"....col Kurtz
-
04-08-2014, 12:37 PM #320
Now look for other resorts leasing land to assume this business model!! My prediction is one of the Aspen resorts looking to distinguish themselves and attract more dentists!
-
04-08-2014, 12:39 PM #321
sad part is Liberal,Osama ' Judges ' may rule f the Gay boarders ,if ' they' wanna Fuckin' Marry each other at Alta!
Last edited by baron; 04-08-2014 at 02:05 PM.
ski paintingshttp://michael-cuozzo.fineartamerica.com" horror has a face; you must make a friend of horror...horror and moral terror.. are your friends...if not, they are enemies to be feared...the horror"....col Kurtz
-
04-08-2014, 12:40 PM #322Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 228
-
04-08-2014, 12:45 PM #323observing free range rude
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- below the Broads Fork Twins
- Posts
- 5,772
^ it is normal and typical for a defendant to defend their interests when being sued.
Alta's ban on snowboarding - rationale:
"These differences create safety concerns that can be avoided or minimized by not allowing snowboarders," Forest Service lawyers wrote in the new filing.
evidence:
<<INSERT EVIDENCE HERE>>
What will Alta and the USFS say when the judge asks for data to support their policy? All the supporting evidence I've seen is anecdotal turds similar to what you see here http://unofficialnetworks.com/shit-a...s-feel-107837/. The data publicly available suggest Alta's reasoning is factually inaccurate and if anything increases the risk its skiers face.
Maybe the more important question is - if snowboarders pose such a hazard to skiers, why does nearly every other resort in the world not protect its skiers similarly? Is Alta irrational, or effectively the rest of the world's ski operators?
-
04-08-2014, 01:00 PM #324
the safety thing is bull shit - alta not allowing boarders is not - lol
-
04-08-2014, 02:24 PM #325
I think it's stupid Alta doesnt allow borders but dont care enough about the issue to pick up a pitchfork over it. Having said that, the "there's so many traverses!" logic is kinda stupid, because people who are good at snowboarding will get out to High Boy without issue while people who are not good will have a rough time. And that is exactly the same as what already happens with skiers now: people who are not good at skiing clog up the works and everyone else dodges around them while trying to carry their speed.
The amount of wasted $ and breath to drum up drama over how snowboarders are a protected class, plus the nazi stickers, klansman stickers, ect... god, I hope I never have to share a chairlift with those hyperbole-prone blowhard fun-sponges. Can Alta lift the ban on snowboarding and replace it with a ban on douchebags?
Bookmarks