Seattle or Denver?

[GeezerSteve]

^ ^ ^ better odds than a ski town by an order of magnitude

. . . I hate listening to whiners, especially about

the inability to find a chicka in Seattle

[Missing Sock]

America's Most Sex-Happy Cities

http://www.menshealth.com/mhlists/metrograde-sex/

Denver. 5
Seattle. 78

[grrrr]

Huh. From the 2000 census:

Men: 280,973
Women: 282,401

Not only that, but 116,703 of the men live on Capital Hil. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

[grrrr]

America's Most Sex-Happy Cities

http://www.menshealth.com/mhlists/metrograde-sex/

Denver. 5
Seattle. 78

You did notice one of the statistics they used was STD rates, right?

[gretch6364]

gretch--go back to illinois.

What? You make very little sense.

[Pow4Brains]

America's Most Sex-Happy Cities

http://www.menshealth.com/mhlists/metrograde-sex/

Denver. 5
Seattle. 78

Holy sheet, no wonder east coasters are so wound up.

[Dromond]

America's Most Sex-Happy Cities

http://www.menshealth.com/mhlists/metrograde-sex/

Denver. 5
Seattle. 78

This list is full of places with lots of drunk people who have nothing to do. Denver was the only moderately cool place on there. Seriously.

[Hugh Conway]

This list is full of places with lots of drunk people who have nothing to do.

duh, it's from Men's Health magazine.

[GeezerSteve]

Factors used to determine sex-happiness (stupid term) were:

condom sales (Nielsen); birth rates (state health departments); sex toy sales (Pure Romance and babeland.com); and, for when either the condom or common sense fails, rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis (state health departments)

So, by MH's logic, a town with more chicks on birth control pills is less sex happy than a town with a bunch of fat mothers with 8 kids. How fuckin' stupid. Of course the Bible Belt cities topped the list. Duh.

[Missing Sock]

Factors used to determine sex-happiness (stupid term) were:So, by MH's logic, a town with more chicks on birth control pills is less sex happy than a town with a bunch of fat mothers with 8 kids. How fuckin' stupid. Of course the Bible Belt cities topped the list. Duh.

You guys are awfully sensitive. You need to get laid more

[Chainsaw_Willie]

Huh. From the 2000 census:

Men: 280,973
Women: 282,401

Interesting. I thought it was less than 10 years ago (but could've been longer) that I was reading an article in Nat. Geographic about population trends and ratios of men to women that showed as you go from East Coast to West Coast the proportion of men/women changes from more women on the East Coast to more men on the West, with the worst discrepancy being up here in the NW corner.

Guess that article was full of it.

[Dromond]

Interesting. I thought it was less than 10 years ago (but could've been longer) that I was reading an article in Nat. Geographic about population trends and ratios of men to women that showed as you go from East Coast to West Coast the proportion of men/women changes from more women on the East Coast to more men on the West, with the worst discrepancy being up here in the NW corner.

Guess that article was full of it.

Well I just looked at the census for Seattle. That could be right for rural areas.

[pappag]

Interesting. I thought it was less than 10 years ago (but could've been longer) that I was reading an article in Nat. Geographic about population trends and ratios of men to women that showed as you go from East Coast to West Coast the proportion of men/women changes from more women on the East Coast to more men on the West, with the worst discrepancy being up here in the NW corner.

Guess that article was full of it.

When I was at the University of Delaware, the male/female ratio was 28:72 so I would say to an extent that article was spot on.

[Danno]

Interesting. I thought it was less than 10 years ago (but could've been longer) that I was reading an article in Nat. Geographic about population trends and ratios of men to women that showed as you go from East Coast to West Coast the proportion of men/women changes from more women on the East Coast to more men on the West, with the worst discrepancy being up here in the NW corner.

Guess that article was full of it.

Yep, seems like you need to blame your lack of getting laid on something else.

[GeezerSteve]

Not sure where you read that, Will. The demographic studies I've seen talk about a general trend that women outnumber men in most US urban areas, and men outnumber women in rural areas. It's an urban/rural thing, not an East/West thing.