Photoshop CS5 preview

**KING-JONG** · 03-25-2010, 04:11 PM

Supposedly it will be released in April. The 'Content-aware fill' looks unreal.
http://thenextweb.com/lifehacks/2010...k-photoshop-5/

**iscariot** · 03-25-2010, 04:23 PM

**kidwoo** · 03-25-2010, 04:37 PM

There was a preview of that feature out months ago. Pretty much blew me away.

**grskier** · 03-25-2010, 05:19 PM

That's pretty insane...

**summit** · 03-25-2010, 05:33 PM

content aware fill... amazing and terrifying

**pointedem** · 03-25-2010, 06:23 PM

that's f'n ridiculous... that last example in particular.

**smalls** · 03-25-2010, 06:35 PM

thats fucking amazing.

i wonder what kind of machine he is running, and how long the fill on the panoramic image would take on a lay person's machine.

**grapedrink** · 03-25-2010, 07:48 PM

i was watching and thinking, that's cool, but it's not mind blowing. until the panorama, how the fuck is that even possible?

**coreyb** · 03-26-2010, 09:28 AM

you gotta be shitting me.... at some point i really want the adobe folks to just stop all this nonsense.... it's not photography anymore!

**kidwoo** · 03-26-2010, 09:37 AM

Originally Posted by coreyb

you gotta be shitting me.... at some point i really want the adobe folks to just stop all this nonsense.... it's not photography anymore!

And when the camera was invented, someone was screaming "this isn't life like drafting anymore!"

You can still shoot and NOT use the tools ya know.

**dipstik** · 03-26-2010, 10:44 AM

So does this mean that watermarking your images is now essentially pointless? I see more harm from this tool than good.

**supermodel159** · 03-26-2010, 11:34 AM

Wow, that's is pretty crazy! That might change my mind from getting LR on the new comp.

**bean** · 03-26-2010, 02:59 PM

Originally Posted by supermodel159

Wow, that's is pretty crazy! That might change my mind from getting LR on the new comp.

Different tools with different uses and purposes.

**wren** · 03-26-2010, 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by dipstik

So does this mean that watermarking your images is now essentially pointless? I see more harm from this tool than good.

Kinda agree with you there. Although that panorama shot thing was unreal.

**kidwoo** · 03-26-2010, 05:36 PM

Originally Posted by dipstik

So does this mean that watermarking your images is now essentially pointless?

I think it means taking pictures at all is pointless.

This will finally take my image making to the next level. A level I felt I simply could not reach with microsoft paint alone.

**shirk** · 03-26-2010, 07:48 PM

I think magazine photo editors are still going to want banger shots in RAW un-shopped.

The marketing hacks are going to have a field day with this. Buy crappy dentist shots for next to nothing and make them sorta like the level of shot that gets run my the photo editor.