Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 228
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,173
    Bozeman locals are as green as could be as they just got open gates two years ago.
    That area is sketchy as hell to start something like that in, as there are very few options of how to get out
    Open gates have been for 4 years now. It's the lift served mentality that is the problem. When we could skin up Slushmans and have much more conservative terrain as the first sidecountry options, there was more respect. Now all the dipshits that can't even ski (the ones that traverse mundys bowl into an abomination) just head out of bounds and ski the first thing they see after slushmans gets tracked out, which is in about an hour. They don't even realize that it is the single most exposed and deadly trap anywhere out there, they just ski it because they see it from the lift and other people are skiing powder there, and well, it sucks to ski tracked out crud all day in slushmans with a half hour liftline. At least all the gapers and girlfriends used to just ski the slushmans skin track and meadow area instead of the sketchiest face in the bridgers when they wanted to ski pow instead of tracked out shit.

    That face is a problem because you can't put 500 morons an hour up that lift and expect them to behave. End of story. It's the evil temptress. It's the biggest heuristic trap I can think of anywhere. While I have adapted in my own way to the new lift and have scattered myself much further most of the time in search of safer turns, I would be thrilled to have slushmans and the bottom gate back for the rest of my ski career here. Slushmans was the perfect sidecountry stash, Saddle is a whole different game.
    Last edited by tone capone; 02-16-2010 at 06:12 PM.
    "The skis just popped me up out of the snow and I went screaming down the hill on a high better than any heroin junkie." She Ra

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    61
    This is only speculation, i cannot confirm a damn word of this, but a friend of mine at bridger told me 11 people are currently missing. Any type of confirmation on this? i hope im not spreading any rumors, hope this isn't true and that everyone is alright, scary shit

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bozeman
    Posts
    2
    saddle was just waiting....saw it go from above. could have been very bad..about 20 people on top of saddle when it slid. and we all know the only way to ski saddle is 10 at a time

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    22,163
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    2,034
    ho-lee-sheet! that's a big'un
    Be careful about buying snowboard goggles for skiing. Snowboard goggles come in right eye and left eye (for goofy-footers) dominant models. This can make it hard to see correctly when skiing because you are facing straight down the hill, not sideways.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,173
    I counted at least six people skiing down to the crown in my photo from Powder Park. All at once. I'll post in a while. I haven't heard anything about 11 people missing, I heard that they think no one was in the slide and that it was triggered by someone dropping a cornice, possibly accidentally.
    "The skis just popped me up out of the snow and I went screaming down the hill on a high better than any heroin junkie." She Ra

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bozeman
    Posts
    2
    kid dropped his pack with skis on it and broke the cornice

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    281
    Well put by tone capone. This is a death trap of slackcountry and the most dangerous face in the Bridgers. The patrol is trying to mitagate this risk by closing the lift at times. As for how it was triggered. Probably just a natural. A skier will most likely have little to no effect on a layer that deep. What probably happened is the slab just settled in and stiffened and the alarm bell rang. The full weight of the new load tipped the scale once in settled and stiffened a bit. Saddle peak is nowhere to be when even one red flag is flying. In this case we had multiple. Huge new load, multiple layers, on the ground sugar, all on deadly terrain. Avy mitagation 101 would point to even the most green of backcountry skiers not tempting that beast right now.

    The west side does get skied. Not by many but it makes the east look safe. It is another no go zone as it is a sugar factory. It has half the snow and it all goes to sugar and ends in terrain traps and thin rock bands. This is where there was an incident last year that required a heli evac.... Fingers crossed that this bullet has been dodged.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    hole
    Posts
    1,272
    Quote Originally Posted by john c View Post
    A skier will most likely have little to no effect on a layer that deep.
    the slab looks much, much thinner on lookers right of the crown. if it's as thin as it looks there, a skier would most definitely have an impact.


    also, why are there at least 2 skiers on that hangfire, and especially at one time..?
    Live To Ski!

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    river city
    Posts
    2,205
    Quote Originally Posted by john c View Post
    This is where there was an incident last year that required a heli evac
    Not gonna drop names but the very same dude who needed that evac last year is credited with pics from todays slide atop saddle peak on the GNFAc site.

    Just sayin. Wise up already.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    6,783
    Damn, that is effing gnarnia. Reminds me a little of north baldy here at the bird times a factor of two at least. Lots of vert lots of consequence, no where to hide. Hopefully this ends well but it would be a miracle. Looks like it may be though. That run looks sick if it ever stabilized though. With my lack of back country travel lately I'd leave it till spring.

    Good luck Bridger folks!
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, and flying through the air

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,173
    From powder park:



    Zoomed in.



    I count 4 on the hangfire, 2 below. I realize I wasn't there and can't say much about the situation the people were in, but really, could this many people on the slope have been avoided on a day like today? I still can't believe how little respect people have for each other on that face. People need to communicate with members of other parties out there, let each other know what their plan is. I mean were all skiers, talk to each other up there.
    "The skis just popped me up out of the snow and I went screaming down the hill on a high better than any heroin junkie." She Ra

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bozeman
    Posts
    446
    Quote Originally Posted by tone capone View Post
    Open gates have been for 4 years now. It's the lift served mentality that is the problem.
    It's all about the mentality of the sidecountry. Sidecountry trips make me much more nervous that pure BC for a bunch of reasons. First, if you have a couple hour skin in front of you, you have a lot of time to ponder the conditions and open your eyes to the consequences of a poor decision. Second, is just the fact that you have more time to study your line and you want to make it count. Easy access inspires a lot of "I think it goes" decisions. Finally, on a full blown tour your group (usually/hopefully) feels alone and you automatically adjust your risk tolerance because you are self reliant. That just doesn't seem to happen in the sidecountry.

    I think as you gain experience you are able to force the mindset. But, you often can't make up for the lack of information you get when you are out for a tour. Maybe you didn't get the avy report? You definitely didn't hear the cracking and woofing as you skinned in. And it is much harder to get your less experienced buddies to stop and dig a pit.

    Slushman's is especially dangerous because its not just the avy conditions. There are so many gnarly lines with high consequences that are easy to ski into. At least the ridge has the 15 min hike to sort some people out.

    I remember touring up Saddle in high school and it was an undertaking (especially if you didn't use the gate at the bottom of South Boundary). We only skied a couple lines back there for the reasons I listed above. Now when I'm out in Slushman's I don't always like the feeling I get. Maybe it is because it's my first season back since the lift went in and I haven't shaken the thought that it is BC terrain. I don't know, it makes me uneasy though.

    I don't know what the solution is. Maybe you close the lift to the public, but keep it inbounds forcing people to skin. That way there would be a little "BC" training ground, which might be a good thing since every other person in Bozeman seems to have touring gear.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,173
    But, you often can't make up for the lack of information you get when you are out for a tour.
    Indeed. Now people are forced to make a descision from the ridgeline.

    Maybe you close the lift to the public, but keep it inbounds forcing people to skin. That way there would be a little "BC" training ground, which might be a good thing since every other person in Bozeman seems to have touring gear.
    Well put.
    "The skis just popped me up out of the snow and I went screaming down the hill on a high better than any heroin junkie." She Ra

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    72
    Or we just leave it alone! Plenty of US resorts have open boundaries and people die all the time. I think the board and patrol have done an outstanding job of managing things thus far. Without Slushman's chair and open boundaries, Bridger goes from world-class to mediocre.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,173
    ^^^^^^World class beat ski hill anyways. I don't know, alot of people had alot of great pow runs over there before the world class lift and the world class traverses and the world class crud after an hour on a pow day.
    "The skis just popped me up out of the snow and I went screaming down the hill on a high better than any heroin junkie." She Ra

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by Lexi-Bell View Post
    Not gonna drop names but the very same dude who needed that evac last year is credited with pics from todays slide atop saddle peak on the GNFAc site.

    Just sayin. Wise up already.
    Wasn't gonna add that, but.... I thought meat got ripped from the bone in the avy last season? Surprised he is back to teach us all his special brand of avalanche knowledge? You know, the avy center doesn't know shit but I do, good to go kind... Closing the lift ain't the option. Closing the gate may be the end game. This is highly consequential terrain and would not be touched by true backcountry users with the sort of snowpack that the Bridgers have right now.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    72
    Tone Capone- I can understand that. The Slushman's Buttress was my first "tour" up here as a college freshman, and I lapped it many times that season. I still prefer it lift accessed, even with the traverses and tracked out chop. You don't need me to tell you about the plentitude of safe(r) lines OB accessed more quickly that the old skin up Slushman's. Probably hold good snow even longer too. If the skiers didn't beat out the snow back when Slushman's was skin-access, the elements did.
    Anyway, just throwing my 2C out there. I think management has done a great job thus far, and while the sob story about losing epic skin-accessed powder turns in slushman's is valid, I prefer being able to play in all kinds of terrain I shied away from back before the area was "controlled".

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    missoula
    Posts
    156
    just spoke with a ski patroller who saw the whole thing from slushmans lift and was part of the search and rescue operation. no bodies found yet, after hours of tranceiver and dog searching. apparently it happened first thing and only a few folks had dropped in prior to the slide, and all those are accounted for. debris went 600' below the get-back trail. miracle that nobody died.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,173
    I prefer being able to play in all kinds of terrain I shied away from back before the area was "controlled".
    Well whatever, we could go back and forth on that one for 10 pages but no good will come of it. I too think that patrol has done a great job considering the very unique circumstances, it just is what it is now. Now it's a tyranny of the idiotic majority. It used to be a great place to earn safe turns and even ski a sick line now and then, now it's a management problem and a feeding frenzy complete with a mad dash out to Saddle during high and considerable danger. The situation there is way beyond the ability of any ski patrol to mitigate with a lift to the top and an open boundary.

    Oh wait, there's always the Forest Service. Count on our illustrious Federal Government to find a solution that will make everyone happy.

    I'd rather them close the lift than the boundary that's for sure. After all, everybody in Bozeman has touring gear now anyways, might as well go back to what worked in the first place.

    Peace I'm out. That's all I care to say. Have fun, see ya out there in the quest for safe turns.
    "The skis just popped me up out of the snow and I went screaming down the hill on a high better than any heroin junkie." She Ra

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    missoula
    Posts
    156
    Quote Originally Posted by tone capone View Post
    I'd rather them close the lift than the boundary that's for sure. After all, everybody in Bozeman has touring gear now anyways, might as well go back to what worked in the first place.
    A lift that nobody is allowed to use - that would be so bridger bowl!

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Skyward
    Posts
    257
    it's a tyranny of the idiotic majority.
    As is everything else in this world..

    I'm not very familiar with Bridger, so I won't pretend to know what I'm talking about.. But, why not go back to the way it was, where the boundary is open but not from the ridge? Ski Slushmans? Fine.. but to access Saddle, you skin in from below.
    Stay left.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    missoula
    Posts
    156
    Quote Originally Posted by Eleventy View Post
    I'm not very familiar with Bridger, so I won't pretend to know what I'm talking about.. But, why not go back to the way it was, where the boundary is open but not from the ridge? Ski Slushmans? Fine.. but to access Saddle, you skin in from below.
    I don't think there's a safe skinning route that's practical, except right under the lift.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bozeman
    Posts
    186
    Damn, I remember talking about this last week....

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    bozone montuckey
    Posts
    4,339
    Quote Originally Posted by Eleventy View Post
    As is everything else in this world..

    I'm not very familiar with Bridger, so I won't pretend to know what I'm talking about.. But, why not go back to the way it was, where the boundary is open but not from the ridge? Ski Slushmans? Fine.. but to access Saddle, you skin in from below.
    it would be an enforcement nightmare.

    think of it this way tony, wont be much point skiing slushman's for a while this year.
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    Ben Franklin

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •