Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306

    Super Bowl in London?!?

    Just heard on ESPN radio that the NFL is planning on playing the Super Bowl in London at Some unspecified time in the future.

    What a stupid idea. It's not like the weather's all that great in February in London, plus it will have to kick off at midnight London time if they want to keep the schedule the same as it has been, plus who in London would give a shit?

    Put the bong down, NFL people.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,247
    Fuck.

    That.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jongistan
    Posts
    5,313
    London UK??

    London Ontario??


    Ontario might kinda make sense, I hear the nucks like our football a lot better than theirs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tunco perfectly summarizing TGR View Post
    It is like Days of Our Lives', but with retards.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    11,756
    Those fucks have been trying to get the brits' money into amercian football for some time. Sending the super bowl over to that rock is such a stupid idea. Way to alienate your proven fan base to appeal to an unproven one.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,247
    They can have the Superbowl if we get the FA Cup final that year.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    six 1 seven
    Posts
    616
    no way that would happen! i heard the pats might do a game out there, but not the super bowl. thats like having the daytona 500 in pakistan.

  7. #7
    advres Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeagueBrian View Post
    thats like having the daytona 500 in pakistan.
    Sounds good to me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    Whatever, that's what they said on the radio in one of the news updates.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    LAX
    Posts
    1,109
    Super Bowl is a corporate event anyway. Joe Schmo can't afford to go whether the game is in Detroit, Phoenix, or London. If they want to play it in London what difference will it make to the casual football fan? The fans make out better if they play the super bowl there rather than a regular season game.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    six 1 seven
    Posts
    616
    ^^oh i believe you heard it

    they prob want a bidding war

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    9,696
    Quote Originally Posted by Tippster View Post
    Fuck.

    That.
    My sentiments exactly.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Summit County
    Posts
    5,058
    Did Goodell go to the Gary Bettman school of how to destroy a pro sports league?
    "The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" --Margaret Thatcher

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    nh
    Posts
    8,224
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeagueBrian View Post
    no way that would happen! i heard the pats might do a game out there, but not the super bowl.
    New England Patriots will spank the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Sunday, October 25 at Wembley Stadium in London as NFL's International Series of regular-season games.
    People should learn endurance; they should learn to endure the discomforts of heat and cold, hunger and thirst; they should learn to be patient when receiving abuse and scorn; for it is the practice of endurance that quenches the fire of worldly passions which is burning up their bodies.
    --Buddha

    *))
    ((*
    *))
    ((*


    www.skiclinics.com

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jack Tone Road
    Posts
    12,741
    I have much less of a problem with London as a Super Bowl venue than as a regular-season venue. But yeah, London in February seems retarded. The Super Bowl should be held outdoors at warm-weather sites, but other than that I don't care where they have it since I'd rather watch it on TV than spend a couple grand to attend a neutral-site game with an hour-long halftime.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London : the L is for Value!
    Posts
    4,575
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    ... plus who in London would give a shit?
    The regular season game sold out Wembley (90,000 seater).

    Out of interest, what kind of cost difference would this represent for travelling fans in the US? I don't really know the prices of domestic vs. transatlantic flights.

    edg
    Do you realize that you've just posted an admission of ignorance so breathtaking that it disqualifies you from commenting on any political or economic threads from here on out?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,306
    You can find flights from the East coast for less than $500 round trip, not sure about from the west, maybe $800 from Cali as a guess? Probably not a significant obstacle for someone who can afford the game ticket in the first place.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Home of the High Peaks
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    Just heard on ESPN radio that the NFL is planning on playing the Super Bowl in London at Some unspecified time in the future.

    What a stupid idea. It's not like the weather's all that great in February in London, plus it will have to kick off at midnight London time if they want to keep the schedule the same as it has been, plus who in London would give a shit?

    Put the bong down, NFL people.

    Yeah but did you hear anything about the Giants trading second round draft choice for Boldin??

    London sux! Dublin's way cooler
    Just breathe

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    9,696
    It's our fucking game. You don't mess with tradition, you don't pull the mask off the Lone Ranger, You don't spit in the wind and you damn sure don't play the championship game of Americas game in a foreign land that thinks soccer is the end all be all !!!!!!! Shit, just writing the word soccer makes me sqeamish.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    6,866
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven S. Dallas View Post
    The Super Bowl should be held outdoors at warm-weather sites ...
    No it shouldn't.

    The Super Bowl should be held in the face of all of nature's elements and not tucked away in some pussified dome or warm paradise with palm trees.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    9,696
    Quote Originally Posted by NPG View Post
    No it shouldn't.

    The Super Bowl should be held in the face of all of nature's elements and not tucked away in some pussified dome or warm paradise with palm trees.
    Damn straight !! I want a mud bowl.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    nh
    Posts
    8,224
    Quote Originally Posted by OSECS View Post
    just writing the word soccer makes me sqeamish.
    And maybe a little gay.
    People should learn endurance; they should learn to endure the discomforts of heat and cold, hunger and thirst; they should learn to be patient when receiving abuse and scorn; for it is the practice of endurance that quenches the fire of worldly passions which is burning up their bodies.
    --Buddha

    *))
    ((*
    *))
    ((*


    www.skiclinics.com

  22. #22
    advres Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by NPG View Post
    No it shouldn't.

    The Super Bowl should be held in the face of all of nature's elements and not tucked away in some pussified dome or warm paradise with palm trees.
    I concur.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,946
    Quote Originally Posted by NPG View Post
    No it shouldn't.

    The Super Bowl should be held in the face of all of nature's elements and not tucked away in some pussified dome or warm paradise with palm trees.
    FTW = DING DING DING!!!

    In fact, it should be like other sports...and it should be held at the home field of the team with the best record. Series or one game, that is how it should be.

    Imagine! Green Bay during the ice bowl...THAT is football.
    You should have been here yesterday!

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SEA
    Posts
    1,725
    Who the fuck cares where its played? Either way its not like many "real" fans get to go anyway... who here would want to pay a few grand to go watch what almost always turns out to be the quietest, least exciting (for the fans in the stands) game of the season with the most unbearably long and frequent commercial interruptions? That is, of course, unless you enjoy schmoozing with the upper-level management executive types in Florida/Cali who have little to no idea what is really going on in the game.

    Watch the game on your TV set, its more fun with the commercials anyway. And if its in the UK its not like you'll notice much difference, even if you do have HD.
    I thought their offices would be strewn with bunny-fucking and condom dispensers, a veritable enchanted forest of cock shafts and twat mist. - JoeStrummer

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    6,866
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    In fact, it should be like other sports...and it should be held at the home field of the team with the best record. Series or one game, that is how it should be.

    Imagine! Green Bay during the ice bowl...THAT is football.
    I agree. But with the way the SB has been marketed, we will never see that. Hell, I bet the 2016 site has already been chosen.

    And along with that, the two weeks between conference championships and the SB has got to go. Football is the only major US sport that does this. To the fan (and I imagine to the players), the additional week is just unnecessary and takes away from the momentum carried on after the championship games.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •