Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Las Vegass
    Posts
    1,966

    new canon rebel t1i


    The rumors were true. Canon has crammed the $1500 50D's sensor and 5D-Mark-II-like 1080p video capture into an $899 entry-level Rebel. We ran it through its paces for a few hours, and it's awesome.

    So what we have here is almost the exact sensor from the 50D—a 15.1 megapixel CMOS with sensitivities up to ISO 12,800 at its top-end H2 boost setting. And almost the exact same HD capture from the 5D Mark II—the only change is that 1080p video is captured at 20fps, down from the 5D Mark II's 30fps. You can step down to 720p video at 30fps, though, for the same buttery smoothness we've seen on the 5D Mark II. Other aspects of the video capture mode have actually been improved over the 5D Mark II though, which we'll get to in a second.

    http://i.gizmodo.com/5182772/canon-r...080p-vids-899-
    Last edited by cdlv; 03-24-2009 at 10:41 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    2,034
    Damn, sounds pretty cool.
    Be careful about buying snowboard goggles for skiing. Snowboard goggles come in right eye and left eye (for goofy-footers) dominant models. This can make it hard to see correctly when skiing because you are facing straight down the hill, not sideways.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    93108
    Posts
    2,776
    Wow, not bad for Canon.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,548
    Nice progression, but 20fps is useless in terms of video.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    2,034
    30 at 720p though.
    Be careful about buying snowboard goggles for skiing. Snowboard goggles come in right eye and left eye (for goofy-footers) dominant models. This can make it hard to see correctly when skiing because you are facing straight down the hill, not sideways.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Crystal_Mt_Dreamin View Post
    30 at 720p though.
    Yeah, that's cool and all, especially given the price.

    But 1080p at 20fps is just kinda silly.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,502
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    Yeah, that's cool and all, especially given the price.

    But 1080p at 20fps is just kinda silly.
    I was thinking the same thing.. But I'm a bit of a vid jong still. I thought HD implied either 30 or 60 fps.... either way, for an entry level DSLR, the rest of the camera looks pretty nice.
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    6,866
    Sounds like packing in the 1080 video feature was purely for marketing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jongistan
    Posts
    5,313
    Quote Originally Posted by grskier View Post
    I was thinking the same thing.. But I'm a bit of a vid jong still. I thought HD implied either 30 or 60 fps.... either way, for an entry level DSLR, the rest of the camera looks pretty nice.
    No, it has more to do with color accuracy and resolution. NTSC TV is an abortion of an image to make color fit in the same bandwidth as black and white TV. Lots of approximations involved.

    60 fps (assuming F stands for frames) would be redonkulous unless used to do half speed slow moes. I don't think you eye would even be able to handle the additional information.
    With progressive scan, even as low as 24 is good, film is essentially 24 FPS progressive scan. Regular old NTSC TV is 29.9 frames per second interlaced or 60 fields per second. A field is sort of like a half frame, but not really.

    Edit: I think NPG tottally nailed it on 1080i on this camera, pure marketing unless you really want that slow frame affect and a big image.
    Last edited by dumpy; 04-03-2009 at 10:14 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tunco perfectly summarizing TGR View Post
    It is like Days of Our Lives', but with retards.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,502
    Quote Originally Posted by dumpy View Post
    No... image.
    Danke...
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jongistan
    Posts
    5,313
    Quote Originally Posted by grskier View Post
    Danke...
    No problemo, sorry if I went too heavy with some nerd terms.

    Just an FYI, NTSC=regular old standard def TV in the US, Canada,Japan and some other places. No real problems with the frame rate on that, although interlacing kinda sucks.
    HD can be in interlaced or progressive (hence terms like 1080p and 1080i) and at various frame rates, but I'm pretty sure most of the broadcast stuff is probably still at 30fps. Since it's digital, it doesn't matter as much as it did with analog.

    And 1080i at 20fps is still pretty goddamn stupid...
    Quote Originally Posted by Tunco perfectly summarizing TGR View Post
    It is like Days of Our Lives', but with retards.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,247
    1080p at 20fps has gotta look "strobey." Just shoot in 720p ar 30fps and you'll be fine.

    I still think fast action stuff (like skiing) looks better in interlaced video than progressive. Then again LCD flatpanel TVs de-interlace the signal anyway so there's no real point, unless you have a 120Hz monitor.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by Tippster View Post
    1080p at 20fps has gotta look "strobey." Just shoot in 720p ar 30fps and you'll be fine.

    I still think fast action stuff (like skiing) looks better in interlaced video than progressive. Then again LCD flatpanel TVs de-interlace the signal anyway so there's no real point, unless you have a 120Hz monitor.
    I found some sample video online, the 1080 20fps did loook pretty strobey, but i think if you were shooting with a macro lens on something up close it would be fine. The 720p compared to the Mark II 5D 1080p video did look pretty good though.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,247
    Quote Originally Posted by 123ski View Post
    I found some sample video online, the 1080 20fps did loook pretty strobey, but i think if you were shooting with a macro lens on something up close it would be fine.
    What difference would that make? You're still looking at a 33% slower frame rate than "normal."

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,016
    I guess what I mean is, if you were shooting something that wasn't moving too much

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4
    The 720p 30fps is a nice funtion, but even then, no exposure control or focusing while it's recording, right?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,548
    Quote Originally Posted by doughboy View Post
    The 720p 30fps is a nice funtion, but even then, no exposure control or focusing while it's recording, right?
    Manual focus ring still works, that's what I do with the 5D. Lost art, but something not impossible to do.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by doughboy View Post
    The 720p 30fps is a nice funtion, but even then, no exposure control or focusing while it's recording, right?
    kind of:

    You can manually focus or autofocus via contrast detect by pressing the Canon T1i's rear AE/AF-Lock button.

    "Capturing movies with the Canon Rebel T1i is not as easy as using a camcorder. It's still really for "artist" videographers, rather than casual users. The primary reason is that the Canon T1i can't autofocus as quickly as we're used to our camcorders doing, and it won't autofocus continuously; you have to press the AE-Lock/AF-Lock button (marked with an asterisk or star) on the back to activate it. When you do, the Canon T1i's exposure will gain up a bit to let in more and less light, perhaps to help the processor find the best contrast, and the focus will move around until it locks on something. You can do this while recording, but both the exposure and focus changes will be recorded in the movie."

    "Following action while focusing is out of the question, though, which isn't ideal."

    "The enthusiast videographer will enjoy the Canon T1i's Movie mode, but there are some shortcomings for them as well. One is that they can't control shutter speed, aperture, or ISO, nor can they know what the camera is setting. Most camcorder users don't expect to be able to select fast or slow shutter speeds, except perhaps a sports mode, but from a camera where you can set both aperture and shutter speed for stills you can be forgiven for expecting a little more control in Movie mode. Many 5D Mark II users have learned to trick the camera by locking the exposure, but it's unclear how to achieve this with the Rebel T1i, at least in the Beta version we tested."

    http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/T1I/T1IA.HTM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •