Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 51 to 57 of 57
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    RM trench
    Posts
    1,969

    Head Monster im95

    Quote Originally Posted by Singel View Post
    Head IM 95 are filthy light...probably not as damp as some other options though.
    I just picked up a pair of these, the 07/08 model but only the top sheet colour changed this year. So far I've only skied them on resort hard-pack, I feel the bindings are too far forward though. Ski-able on hard snow but I'm leaning back more than forward, & I can't just roll my knee to hold an edge & carve a turn. skidding turns are ok. methinks they will suck in powder but I won't move the bindings until I actually ski them in pow.

    super-dooper light! skinning will be a breeze, but they bounce round on choppy skied-out resort crapiness.

    the set-up is BD O1 tele bindings, 28 T1 boots. 181cm skis, I'm 6'2" 155lb. I mounted my (tele) boot mid-sole 2cm behind the line (ie the 3 pin line is 147mm in front of the line). I'd be tempted to move them back 2cm, an input anyone else has for these as a tele set-up would be appreciated.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,922
    I am trying to get rid of a pair of 172 cms Volkl T-Rock, I like them fine but I'm looking to ride something wider and I'm broke so I'm trying to sell them now and maybe get the wider skis next year... anyway...

    You can read about that ski and other comparable ones from the same people's perspective here:

    http://www.telemarkski.com/html/intr...t_reviews.html

    and PM me if you are interested in the T-Rocks

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Colyrady
    Posts
    3,781
    Anyone know what the weight of Fischer Watea 84s are?

    Here's whats really still in the running:

    - Used pair of TUA crossride 112 - the devil you know is better...

    - K2 Baker Superlights

    - Fischer Watea 84 (not sure on the weight but got a deal)

    - Dynafit Manaslu - can get new for $420 - although I dont think it fits my critera as a steep hard snow ski.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Issaquah
    Posts
    2,058
    I love my Baker superlights with Dynafit setup.
    License to kill gophers by the government of the United Nations

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,243
    Quote Originally Posted by smitchell333 View Post
    - Used pair of TUA crossride 112 - the devil you know is better...
    Hey, did you hook up with my buddy with the used 112's?

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Colyrady
    Posts
    3,781
    Quote Originally Posted by Ski to Be View Post
    I love my Baker superlights with Dynafit setup.
    How do they do on the PNW summer ice and rime?

    I've been hearing about their "deflection" and issues holding edge on icy. Is that just from people who cant hold an edge w/o a stiff heavy ski or is there some truth to it?


    Quote Originally Posted by Big Steve View Post
    Hey, did you hook up with my buddy with the used 112's?
    No not yet, I'm kinda tempted to get something justa bit wider.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Your Mom's Bed
    Posts
    416
    Quote Originally Posted by smitchell333 View Post
    How do they do on the PNW summer ice and rime?

    I've been hearing about their "deflection" and issues holding edge on icy. Is that just from people who cant hold an edge w/o a stiff heavy ski or is there some truth to it?.
    I skied Baker SLs last winter for touring in the PNW and deceided they were too soft for me. Edge hold was never an issue, but they got tossed around too much in heavier snow conditions. This winter switched to the RT86 and I'm very glad I did. The performance is on a higher level, and the weight is nearly identical to the Baker SL.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •