Page 239 of 325 FirstFirst ... 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 ... LastLast
Results 5,951 to 5,975 of 8104
  1. #5951
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,133
    Went mountain biking in Virginia last weekend. Its pretty down there.
    Virginia sunset 1489 by Ed Carley, on Flickr

  2. #5952
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Moose, Iowa
    Posts
    7,943
    I decided to try Instagram. My 3 year old (now 4) girl and my wife.

  3. #5953
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,633












    Last edited by splitter; 06-21-2014 at 12:46 PM.

  4. #5954
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    2,573
    Splitter - love the fourth shot of your son! Looks like a good father's day (and a pooped kid).

  5. #5955
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,633
    thanks UCL, everybody likes a good drink around the campfire

    a stoked little man and his mom roasting marshmallows




    and the eastside has lots of ways of making you feel small


  6. #5956
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Revelstoke; Rogers Pass
    Posts
    877
    Random waterfall near my new digs in Vancouver

    Quote Originally Posted by grrrr
    There are good men out there. Good men who are good looking, who ski hard, have their shit in order, know their priorities in life and will make you happy. I'm not one of them, but they are out there.

  7. #5957
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    159
    June, 18th went for a ski at Alta.





  8. #5958
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Posts
    11,743
    Tried to make the best of some mid-day light on the Golden Gate Bridge today.


    30-Minute Walk - Golden Gate Bridge by Phil Herbert, on Flickr


    30-Minute Walk - Golden Gate Bridge by Phil Herbert, on Flickr


    30-Minute Walk - Golden Gate Bridge by Phil Herbert, on Flickr

  9. #5959
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Stumptown
    Posts
    711

  10. #5960
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sector 7G
    Posts
    5,667
    Spirit Sheep

    This is the worst pain EVER!

  11. #5961
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,431
    Took this long-exposure (~3s) creek shot earlier this week, practicing for my upcoming trip to Iceland. Not necessarily related to this picture, but does anyone have pointers on long exposures? Always use mirror lockup? Does that matter if the shot isn't 30s or more? This one seemed to be really sharp and I didn't use lockup, so I'm not sure what that does. I'm a newb when it comes to anything more than 1/4s.


  12. #5962
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sector 7G
    Posts
    5,667
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    Took this long-exposure (~3s) creek shot earlier this week, practicing for my upcoming trip to Iceland. Not necessarily related to this picture, but does anyone have pointers on long exposures? Always use mirror lockup? Does that matter if the shot isn't 30s or more? This one seemed to be really sharp and I didn't use lockup, so I'm not sure what that does. I'm a newb when it comes to anything more than 1/4s.
    Steve, mirror lock up on long exposures is useless. Any vibration that you might get from the mirror moving will be masked by the limited amounts of light that's hitting your sensor for the very short time period when the mirror is moving.
    This is the worst pain EVER!

  13. #5963
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Revelstoke; Rogers Pass
    Posts
    877
    Kinda depends on your setup and what you're shooting, but I've found mirror lock up useful for longer focal lengths such as shooting celestial objects. Not so important for wide angle.

    Beyond that, hang your bag from your tripod, use the eyepiece cover to avoid stray light and try not to walk around while your camera is exposing.

    I am a total photo jong though, so if anybody wants to correct me on this go right ahead.
    Quote Originally Posted by grrrr
    There are good men out there. Good men who are good looking, who ski hard, have their shit in order, know their priorities in life and will make you happy. I'm not one of them, but they are out there.

  14. #5964
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sector 7G
    Posts
    5,667
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiilbert View Post
    Kinda depends on your setup and what you're shooting, but I've found mirror lock up useful for longer focal lengths such as shooting celestial objects.
    good point.
    This is the worst pain EVER!

  15. #5965
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    1,445
    Playing around with my new camera... a beautiful sunset in southern Vermont, and then some mushrooms in my yard

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC00126.jpg 
Views:	61 
Size:	1.07 MB 
ID:	156361
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC00131.jpg 
Views:	57 
Size:	939.3 KB 
ID:	156362
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC00108.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	912.7 KB 
ID:	156363

  16. #5966
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,354
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    does anyone have pointers on long exposures?
    I'm guessing this is obvious, but in case it's not, use the self-timer feature. That way you click the button and the shutter fires later so your pressing the shutter button doesn't affect the image.

  17. #5967
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,633
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    Not necessarily related to this picture, but does anyone have pointers on long exposures? Always use mirror lockup? Does that matter if the shot isn't 30s or more? This one seemed to be really sharp and I didn't use lockup, so I'm not sure what that does. I'm a newb when it comes to anything more than 1/4s.
    I rarely use mirror lock-up. It would probably fit under the category of 'best practices', but Lonnie and Wiilbert both kinda nailed it. Depending on focal length, the necessity is nonexistent or highly important. If you have time and are on a unique trip like Iceland, go for it. If not, well, I don't use it much and I'm a tripod hugger that shoots 1/2-3 seconds all the time (or at least when I get to shoot).

    Beyond that, I'd try different shutter speeds when I'm there. I'm certainly guilty of some super-silky water and sometimes that look really works. But I've also come to appreciate a little bit of texture in my fuzzy water. I want to convey movement but I also want some detail to appreciate. LIke I said, sometimes super-silky is terrific. It can give a nice contrast to a rocky/rigid environment. But play with shutter speeds while you're there.

    some fuzzy water that doesn't go overly silky…






    and a recent 1.6 second exposure that seems pretty sharp to me but no mirror lock-up


  18. #5968
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,431
    Yep, got that.

    I have enough filters to alter the exposure by five stops (2-stop polarizer and a 3-stop ND)... Think thats enough for most situations if i combine it with a super low ISO and high f-stop?

  19. #5969
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,633
    I'm excited to see what you bring back. When do you leave? How long is the trip?

    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    Yep, got that.

    I have enough filters to alter the exposure by five stops (2-stop polarizer and a 3-stop ND)... Think thats enough for most situations if i combine it with a super low ISO and high f-stop?
    I'd probably add a GND to that mix. The above shot of North Peak at Greenstone lake was shot with a 2 stop CP, 3 stop ND, a hard GND above the lake and a soft GND to balance the grass. That's probably over-filtering, but I'd add a GND to the mix. 3 stop soft will give you the best range of use. But I've come to dig my hard GND quite a bit.

    This used the hard GND





    last couple of shots from our little EastSide campin' trip.

    If Supermodel looks closely he'll see that I was able to hook up his request from a while back but lost it to my wife…





  20. #5970
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,431
    Quote Originally Posted by splitter View Post
    I'm excited to see what you bring back. When do you leave? How long is the trip?
    We leave at the end of July and will be there for 12 days. Four days on the Snaefellsness Peninsula, three days east of Vik near Skaftafell NP, and five days just west of Vik near the Hekla volcano.

  21. #5971
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,496
    Quote Originally Posted by splitter View Post
    I'm excited to see what you bring back. When do you leave? How long is the trip?



    I'd probably add a GND to that mix. The above shot of North Peak at Greenstone lake was shot with a 2 stop CP, 3 stop ND, a hard GND above the lake and a soft GND to balance the grass. That's probably over-filtering, but I'd add a GND to the mix. 3 stop soft will give you the best range of use. But I've come to dig my hard GND quite a bit.

    This used the hard GND
    What does that look like on the front of the lens?
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  22. #5972
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,633
    It looks like a lot of shit. Lots of vignetting unless I make the focal length at least 24mm on a 16-85 zoom. At 24 though, it works pretty well. Usually not nearly that much is stacked. For that photo I wanted to smooth the water to see the rocks underneath and try to create two different textures at the water/turf interface. With a 2 1/2 year old there doesn't seem to be much light chasing on camping trips since that is prime dinner/marshmallow time. At 10,000 feet in bright sun you do what you can to get a shot that reflects at least a portion of a vision. If I had a darker ND I wouldn't need to stack so much I'd imagine.

    The b/w posted had only the hard GND.
    Last edited by splitter; 06-23-2014 at 12:28 PM.

  23. #5973
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,431
    I was thinking about a Grad ND, but I'm not completely sold on them because of the definitive transition in the middle of the circular lens. I don't take many (or any?) shots that have a transition right in the middle of the frame... seems kind of impractical to me. Maybe I'm just a noob when it comes to using them and don't know what I'm doing though, which is probably more likely.

    Something like this, maybe?

    http://smile.amazon.com/Tiffen-Gradu...density+filter

  24. #5974
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Posts
    11,743
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    I was thinking about a Grad ND, but I'm not completely sold on them because of the definitive transition in the middle of the circular lens. I don't take many (or any?) shots that have a transition right in the middle of the frame... seems kind of impractical to me. Maybe I'm just a noob when it comes to using them and don't know what I'm doing though, which is probably more likely.

    Something like this, maybe?

    http://smile.amazon.com/Tiffen-Gradu...density+filter
    I think something more like this is practical: http://smile.amazon.com/IMAGE%C2%AE-...density+filter

    The plate filters can be used with a holder or handheld to get the transition in the correct spot in the frame.

    ETA: I know nothing about this particular product. Just that it's the style I'm referencing.

  25. #5975
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,495
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiilbert View Post
    Random waterfall near my new digs in Vancouver
    ^ This is awesome! Love the deep greens.
    Gallery || Facebook || Instagram
    Go that way, really fast...if something gets in your way, TURN!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •