Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    PacNW
    Posts
    954

    Good Bindings that move?

    Can anyone reccommend a decent 14din binding which allows adjustment of the mounting position, both toe and heel? I love my stash of P14s and 914's, but hate the idea of re-drilling just to try a new mounting point.
    Last edited by Shin-to-Win; 09-11-2008 at 05:12 PM.
    "Don't tease me about my hobbies, I don't tease you about being an asshole"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Berkeley
    Posts
    1,255
    I have a pair of Tyrolia Railfex HD14 on some explosivs. They work fine.

    You can also move the railflex between ski pretty easily. Just put a rails on each ski (~$20).

    In the case of the Explosive the Railflexes allowed me to mount without having hole pattern problems. (It was the 3rd mount)


    Another option is Look demo bindings. At least with the P-series demos, the toe and heel move independently. so with a little math, you could alter the mounting point.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    I-70
    Posts
    3,448
    Only negative of railflex is my boot is an inch from the ski, one pair of binders for 3 sets of skis is nice though.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Western Pacific
    Posts
    42
    I bought a pair of railflex for the same reason as you- ability to move the binding fore/aft. They are easy to move and also adjust to other BSLs. Also very easy to mount yourself because of the rails. They are a bit heavy though. Look at the weight specs if it's a concern for you. I think Level Nine Sports usually has some good deals on them.

    I also bought a pair of 912 demos for the same reason. I actually prefer them to the railflex, but only a 12 DIN.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Right Coast transplant
    Posts
    3,063
    I dont know if it was a system ski or not but atomic had a binding that was intended to move for "race" and "free"
    Live

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    back to flat and no snow
    Posts
    371
    Quote Originally Posted by skiingsamurai View Post
    I dont know if it was a system ski or not but atomic had a binding that was intended to move for "race" and "free"
    And even an Extreme position!! Those are the bindings I first thought of also when I saw this thread.

    I have some for sale, din 6-14, PM if interested.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    Quote Originally Posted by skiingsamurai View Post
    I dont know if it was a system ski or not but atomic had a binding that was intended to move for "race" and "free"
    Those "ESS V.A.R." or "Atomic" bindings are so sloppy, it's COMICAL!!
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ess El Sea
    Posts
    3,351
    Quote Originally Posted by DropCliffsNotBombs View Post
    Those "ESS V.A.R." or "Atomic" bindings are so sloppy, it's COMICAL!!
    I've never had a problem with my beat to shit 1018s.
    Congrats, mags! We collected 1030.68! for birdman!
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuckerman View Post
    No is that like whne I come on your mosms face whle you lick my ballsss???

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan Explosion View Post
    I've never had a problem with my beat to shit 1018s.
    Just think of what you have been missing!!
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    6,041
    I like the atomic 1018's but they are heavy. The 614's can be ok, but some of the heels break. I've never skied the 17-din tyrolias.

    There's also the salomon driver plus lifter plates, which bolt to the ski, then the ski bolts to the plate...simple plastic. They can be moved fore and aft 1cm. Weigh about 1/2lb and are 8mm rise. Good setup with S914's if you can get your hands on a set.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,043
    I got some sets of 977 rental bindings from back in the day , we used to get em off old CMH heli skis which were then good for 3pins and leathers ... the telewhackers would often just chuck the binding

    the toe & heel move seperately but a little plastic cam in the toe piece latching system would wear ...if you come upon these note that they work fine till the toe piece eventualy gets sloppy on the track

    and I think they only go to 11 or 12

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by DropCliffsNotBombs View Post
    Those "ESS V.A.R." or "Atomic" bindings are so sloppy, it's COMICAL!!
    Hmm, maybe the original ones from like 10 years ago.


    The atomic race style bindings (race, cr, r series, etc) can adjust both toe and heel.


    The atomic neox bindings do as well, and don't break as much, and also dont look as dumb.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    PacNW
    Posts
    954
    Thanks for the suggestions. Those Atomic lower dins bindings suck balls, had a set of 6-12's heels go lame after only 5 days. Both heels had so much slop, I couldn't stay in them on the cat track.

    Anyhow, I think I have some older sollys with the stupid poweraxe plate in a box somewhere. Might be the ticket since I really only need 1cm each way. I'll start on the line and go from there.
    "Don't tease me about my hobbies, I don't tease you about being an asshole"

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    South Lake Tahoe
    Posts
    3,612
    How much torsional slop is in the railflex system? I might by a pair of used skis mounted with them.


    Quote Originally Posted by Pause View Post
    I bought a pair of railflex for the same reason as you- ability to move the binding fore/aft. They are easy to move and also adjust to other BSLs. Also very easy to mount yourself because of the rails. They are a bit heavy though. Look at the weight specs if it's a concern for you. I think Level Nine Sports usually has some good deals on them.

    I also bought a pair of 912 demos for the same reason. I actually prefer them to the railflex, but only a 12 DIN.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    355
    The newer Blizzard skies have a rail system (Free IQ?) that would do what you want. Although the three sets of skis would all have to be Blizzards and so would the single set of bindings
    Your jambox is now his...by way of our actions

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    2,123
    Vist? Vist plate on ski, binding on plate... should be easy to move mounting position...
    Quote Originally Posted by Alkasquawlik View Post
    So there I was McGoverning down the mountain but I McConkeyed the hell out of a Morrison and landed on my Harrisons. Just then I Skogened off a Tuffelmire but hit my McMurray into a Holmes. As I came to the Burke I Steele Spenced over a Moles and stopped on a Krietler. Then I saw Gaffney, and then two Gaffneys, but they Moseleyed me into a Hall. So I said, "Pep!!" and Saged on out of that Thovex.
    Poetry, on motion.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bravo Delta.
    Posts
    6,135
    Quote Originally Posted by Socialist View Post
    They have socalized healthcare up in canada. The whole country is 100% full of pot smoking pro-athlete alcoholics.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    192
    Which rossi skis is this actually on, or is it just concept?

    Secondly, magnetraction snowboards????? Think i have heard that one before... Lib tech?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    2,123
    just the S4... optional, too.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alkasquawlik View Post
    So there I was McGoverning down the mountain but I McConkeyed the hell out of a Morrison and landed on my Harrisons. Just then I Skogened off a Tuffelmire but hit my McMurray into a Holmes. As I came to the Burke I Steele Spenced over a Moles and stopped on a Krietler. Then I saw Gaffney, and then two Gaffneys, but they Moseleyed me into a Hall. So I said, "Pep!!" and Saged on out of that Thovex.
    Poetry, on motion.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    109

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    I-70
    Posts
    3,448
    Quote Originally Posted by jonnyquest View Post
    Not compatable, the binders are RF1 and the plates are RF2. Unless I missed something, which is very possible.
    Last edited by karpiel; 10-04-2008 at 10:14 PM.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Other Side
    Posts
    752
    Small Hijack here but I thought it was still on topic.

    Is it possible to re-use Duke's on multiple pairs of skis? Can you get multiple plates and just move em around?

    I know you don't need to tour on every pair of skis that you own but the Dukes are a bomber binding, and I don't slide rails that much so... this might be a cheap way of having great bindings across the quiver for cheap?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •