Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,373

    Summit 2005: Whistler

    Pros?
    Cons?

    Discuss.

    Sick and ashamed and happy (and showing a speckle of initiative),
    d.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    River City
    Posts
    2,387
    Closer to my house.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,373
    A strong point in favour.

    Sick and ashamed and happy (and will the Jackson supporters be able to top that?),
    d.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Emulating the ocean's sound
    Posts
    7,008
    already planning a trip to w/b. so if the dates dont jive i would have to be redundant to make it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,440
    Pros - Tom will be there this winter
    - could book a couple of super condos
    - could book the Creekside Inn
    -has terrain comparable to JH
    - can get a refill on my AC&Cs
    - more than enough nitelife

    Cons - Can't think any, unless it rains, cause I LOVE CANADIA

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Halfway Between the Gutter and the Stars
    Posts
    3,808
    Pro- boot ballet
    Last edited by Beaver; 06-21-2004 at 03:51 PM.
    You are what you eat.
    ---------------------------------------------------
    There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jack Tone Road
    Posts
    12,741
    What basom said, not coincidentally. But that's not really a strike against it in my opinion.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Ski-attle
    Posts
    2,220
    Yyyyyeeeaaaaaaahhhhh, Whistler!!!!!

    No cons, baby, no cons.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,359
    Pro: those flying in could fly into Seattle and spend a day or two at Washington mountains such as Crystal or Baker.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Überville, with the Überites!
    Posts
    2,497
    Originally posted by gincognito
    A strong point in favour.
    d.
    That reminds me... DIMNS could show up and not feel so out of place with his poor spelling skills.

    I don't care whether it will be W/B or JH. They're both on my list of places to go before I die.
    Fighting foot fungus one public bath house at a time!

    My site

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595
    Pros

    I'll attend if the summit's in Whistler cos I can't stomach the three flights to Jackson

    Cons

    If it is in Jackson I'm gonna go to the SLC Mini. Utards lock up your ski poles.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,537
    Pro's: we have more maggot constituency in the greater PacNW/South BC area than we have on J-Hole. (If my count is right) That means better locals coordination, which can be helpful in putting together this level of event. It also means more folks will drive, which make car pooling and broader transportation options more available. Also, if folks want to do car shuttles or head up to another area for a day or two, that becomes easier.
    Sammmich will be there as will other maggots gone local.
    another Handsome Boy graduate

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Beautiful BC
    Posts
    2,971
    Originally posted by 1080Rider
    Closer to my house.
    Too close to my house.
    If you have a problem & think that someone else is going to solve it for you then you have two problems.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Fart Louderdale
    Posts
    636
    The Boot Ballet, both a pro and a con.
    Last edited by jayfrizzo; 06-21-2004 at 03:15 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,559
    Roo - I think you can make Jackson Hole in just two flights from London if you fly via Denver on BA.

    Not that W/B isn't the better choice.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    27,359
    Originally posted by jayfrizzo
    The Boot Ballet, both a pro and a con.
    Beaver said it's gone. I heard the Boot was closing, but wasn't sure when. Does anyone know?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Snoqualmie
    Posts
    1,298
    Humongous Con: TGR not based in Whistler.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Emulating the ocean's sound
    Posts
    7,008
    Originally posted by The AD
    Beaver said it's gone. I heard the Boot was closing, but wasn't sure when. Does anyone know?
    say it aint soooooo! the shoestring was my home away from home in school. if the ballet is gone i'm boycotting. the shoestring didnt go down with the boot did it???

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    W/B is totally sick, huge mountains, huge vert, huge snow. Every type of terrain you can want. The village is compact and has shuttles so maggots who fly to Vancouver wouldn't have to rent a car. Drinking age is 19 instead of 21 (big plus for some maggots). Generally cheaper overall than JH, and will most likely have more reliable conditions in March than the Hole. Cat skiing operation nearby, as with a heli-ski outfit. Unlimitied backcountry options. W/B is a no brainer to me, as long as the date of the Summit are between the 9th and the 30th of March 2005.

    -Ben

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Halfway Between the Gutter and the Stars
    Posts
    3,808
    Apparently I was given some bad info. I just called ((604) 932-3338) and yes, it is still in operation.
    You are what you eat.
    ---------------------------------------------------
    There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Emulating the ocean's sound
    Posts
    7,008
    Originally posted by Beaver
    Apparently I was given some bad info. I just called ((604) 932-3338) and yes, it is still in operation.
    THANK THE LORD ALLMIGHTY!

    and GM: greater chance of getting rained on and poo for visability.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    Originally posted by basom


    and GM: greater chance of getting rained on and poo for visability.
    True, but Jackson will most likely be sludge on all but the highest alititude pitches by March, the exposure of that place kinda sucks. At least whistler can recover faster than JH.

    -Ben

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    MT
    Posts
    1,360
    Originally posted by glademaster
    True, but Jackson will most likely be sludge on all but the highest alititude pitches by March, the exposure of that place kinda sucks. At least whistler can recover faster than JH.

    -Ben
    Wasn't it brought up about having it in Feb instead of March?
    My Montana has an East Infection

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    180
    Originally posted by glademaster
    True, but Jackson will most likely be sludge on all but the highest alititude pitches by March, the exposure of that place kinda sucks. -Ben
    WHAT????

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,291
    Originally posted by Mountainman
    Wasn't it brought up about having it in Feb instead of March?
    If it was I must have skipped over it, in that case, I'm still rooting for Whistler.

    -Ben

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •