Results 1 to 25 of 36
Thread: Summit 2005: Whistler
-
06-21-2004, 02:04 PM #1Sub-par GTA Player
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Montreal
- Posts
- 2,373
Summit 2005: Whistler
Pros?
Cons?
Discuss.
Sick and ashamed and happy (and showing a speckle of initiative),
d.
-
06-21-2004, 02:10 PM #2
Closer to my house.
-
06-21-2004, 02:11 PM #3Sub-par GTA Player
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Montreal
- Posts
- 2,373
A strong point in favour.
Sick and ashamed and happy (and will the Jackson supporters be able to top that?),
d.
-
06-21-2004, 02:30 PM #4
already planning a trip to w/b. so if the dates dont jive i would have to be redundant to make it.
-
06-21-2004, 02:39 PM #5glocal
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 33,440
Pros - Tom will be there this winter
- could book a couple of super condos
- could book the Creekside Inn
-has terrain comparable to JH
- can get a refill on my AC&Cs
- more than enough nitelife
Cons - Can't think any, unless it rains, cause I LOVE CANADIA
-
06-21-2004, 02:47 PM #6
Pro- boot ballet
Last edited by Beaver; 06-21-2004 at 03:51 PM.
You are what you eat.
---------------------------------------------------
There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.
-
06-21-2004, 02:50 PM #7
What basom said, not coincidentally. But that's not really a strike against it in my opinion.
-
06-21-2004, 02:52 PM #8happy
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- Ski-attle
- Posts
- 2,220
Yyyyyeeeaaaaaaahhhhh, Whistler!!!!!
No cons, baby, no cons.
-
06-21-2004, 02:52 PM #9
Pro: those flying in could fly into Seattle and spend a day or two at Washington mountains such as Crystal or Baker.
-
06-21-2004, 02:54 PM #10Originally posted by gincognito
A strong point in favour.
d.
I don't care whether it will be W/B or JH. They're both on my list of places to go before I die.
-
06-21-2004, 02:58 PM #11
Pros
I'll attend if the summit's in Whistler cos I can't stomach the three flights to Jackson
Cons
If it is in Jackson I'm gonna go to the SLC Mini. Utards lock up your ski poles.
-
06-21-2004, 03:09 PM #12
Pro's: we have more maggot constituency in the greater PacNW/South BC area than we have on J-Hole. (If my count is right) That means better locals coordination, which can be helpful in putting together this level of event. It also means more folks will drive, which make car pooling and broader transportation options more available. Also, if folks want to do car shuttles or head up to another area for a day or two, that becomes easier.
Sammmich will be there as will other maggots gone local.another Handsome Boy graduate
-
06-21-2004, 03:09 PM #13Originally posted by 1080Rider
Closer to my house.If you have a problem & think that someone else is going to solve it for you then you have two problems.
-
06-21-2004, 03:12 PM #14
The Boot Ballet, both a pro and a con.
Last edited by jayfrizzo; 06-21-2004 at 03:15 PM.
-
06-21-2004, 03:12 PM #15
Roo - I think you can make Jackson Hole in just two flights from London if you fly via Denver on BA.
Not that W/B isn't the better choice.
-
06-21-2004, 03:21 PM #16Originally posted by jayfrizzo
The Boot Ballet, both a pro and a con.
-
06-21-2004, 03:30 PM #17Of the Bu-Tang Clan
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Snoqualmie
- Posts
- 1,298
Humongous Con: TGR not based in Whistler.
-
06-21-2004, 03:32 PM #18Originally posted by The AD
Beaver said it's gone. I heard the Boot was closing, but wasn't sure when. Does anyone know?
-
06-21-2004, 03:46 PM #19Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- In Your Wife
- Posts
- 8,291
W/B is totally sick, huge mountains, huge vert, huge snow. Every type of terrain you can want. The village is compact and has shuttles so maggots who fly to Vancouver wouldn't have to rent a car. Drinking age is 19 instead of 21 (big plus for some maggots). Generally cheaper overall than JH, and will most likely have more reliable conditions in March than the Hole. Cat skiing operation nearby, as with a heli-ski outfit. Unlimitied backcountry options. W/B is a no brainer to me, as long as the date of the Summit are between the 9th and the 30th of March 2005.
-Ben
-
06-21-2004, 03:51 PM #20
Apparently I was given some bad info. I just called ((604) 932-3338) and yes, it is still in operation.
You are what you eat.
---------------------------------------------------
There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.
-
06-21-2004, 03:53 PM #21Originally posted by Beaver
Apparently I was given some bad info. I just called ((604) 932-3338) and yes, it is still in operation.
and GM: greater chance of getting rained on and poo for visability.
-
06-21-2004, 04:53 PM #22Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- In Your Wife
- Posts
- 8,291
Originally posted by basom
and GM: greater chance of getting rained on and poo for visability.
-Ben
-
06-21-2004, 04:59 PM #23Originally posted by glademaster
True, but Jackson will most likely be sludge on all but the highest alititude pitches by March, the exposure of that place kinda sucks. At least whistler can recover faster than JH.
-BenMy Montana has an East Infection
-
06-21-2004, 05:01 PM #24Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 180
Originally posted by glademaster
True, but Jackson will most likely be sludge on all but the highest alititude pitches by March, the exposure of that place kinda sucks. -Ben
-
06-21-2004, 07:16 PM #25Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- In Your Wife
- Posts
- 8,291
Originally posted by Mountainman
Wasn't it brought up about having it in Feb instead of March?
-Ben
Bookmarks