Agree with all this. I don’t see much of a reason to take the og out anymore. But I do feel like the old version was special and while the new version is a better ski, just not quite as special....

I’ve spent a lot of time on the e104 and the m102, most recently the newest version of the m102. The next paragraph talks about the e104 va the newest version of the m102

If you can mash moguls...

I’ve skied the og in 177 and 184 and the new version in 184. I much prefer the new version. Blends the best attributes of the old 177 and 184 for me. I’m 190 and 6’2” and only skid them on...

I have the weird wander too for the first few runs when skiing the 177s. Bumped up to 184 and zero wander. Haven’t lost any maneuverability either - it’s like a more refined ski for me. I’m...

Spent my last day of the season on mine as wel. M102s are next level. Keep coming back to it - they’re the best skis that have been introduced in the past several years imho.

Bandit man got it. This year I have 50+ days. Last year about 10. This year I could ski the m102 in any length in any condition better than I could ski any ski last year, much less the m102. ...

I have the e104 and the m102 too. Love the e104 when its softish all over or there’s 6-12 inches of fresh snow.

On the east coast, under 6 inches of fresh snow and chances of firm snow mixed in...

I’ve skis the m6 184 on 10-12 days in the past few weeks. Ridiculously good ski. It’s definitely not the tank the 102 is, but is more nimble and maneuverable in equal lengths and can still rip...

I have the 102 in 177. Love the ski. So much that I want to get in 184 too. I don’t find the top end is limited on the 177 - if I go 184 should I bump a cm or 2 to make it more maneuverable in...