But if property in several states becomes uninsurable, doesn't that just increase demand in the states that aren't affected? Your Florida beachfront property loses 90% of its value, but houses in the Twin Cities spike 30%.
Printable View
Without companies “gambling” on the stock market your premiums would be a lot higher. Many carriers just try to break even on their property insurance programs (before even considering corporate allocations) and make money on the investments. If carriers weren’t allowed to invest the premiums they would need to charge more to make a profit or they would just stop writing certain lines.
Construction is really expensive. Insured losses cost way more than uninsured losses. Handling claims is expensive. Most of the market intelligence I get say that prices have now stabilized in the reinsurance market.
Any of you with significant investments are welcome to participate as an insurer. Lloyds of London will still pay you premium for pledging assets as collateral. Then you too can experience a condo complex making a claim 18 months after a hurricane for $4,000,000, spending $250,000 on adjusters and engineers to show that said claim is mostly accrued maintenance and preexisting conditions, all to pay out $2,000,000 at appraisal because the appraiser just split the baby regardless of facts.
it's socialized to provide appropriate indemnification. Let's take some common concepts:
1. "I paid in x over the years" - if you have a loss in year 1, should you only be entitled to premium payout? No, you should be made whole, that's done through socialization of premiums to pay losses.
2. Profit - profit is metered by state approvals, as states won't approve rate hikes if you're already making good money in the state. If you look at the healthiest earners - Geico/Progressive - they're still only getting a 10-15% profit margin. Go look at Apple or Google profit margins in the 20's and 30's. On the flipside, you have State Farm that's LOSING nearly 20 cents on the dollar of premiums.
3. "but investments" - yes, but investment returns are not always reliable, so it's a bit of a crapshoot. Also, a lot of what insurers invest in is not gambling as much as longer term payback stuff that requires a bunch of capital (think oil refineries), as it's usually more stable than market playing.
Would I take insurance that's a socialized nonprofit? Sure, but "how much profit do we need for capital reserves?" would be the undoing of that most likely, as after 3-4 good years you'd have people arguing to deplete them, only for a massive catastrophe year to roll through. Unfortunately, government is still mostly directed by politicians, who are mostly concerned with winning popularity contests, not hard fiduciary duties.
It'll be exactly like the health insurance exchange. You'll buy a plan from a private company through homeinsurance.gov and your premiums will be subsidized by the federal government, depending on your income level.
Umm.....no forests anywhere near Lahaina. The Paradise, CA fire was mostly structure fires; the trees in town were actually the only thing left standing. The recent massive fires in the Texas Panhandle? Not woodlands there either.
If you live around chaparral, sagebrush or scrub grasslands, that's prime fire country. As far as the actuaries are concerned, you're in the same pool of risk as the folks in the trees. Dense subdivisions in windy areas are also in the pool of risk. There's been some costly fires in the front range that were mostly brush and houses. That one in Boulder cost over $2B and it wasn't even fire season! That fire blowtorched during the cold months far away from any trees.
All you need is some tightly built subdivisions, 50mph winds, Mrs. O'Leary's cow and whoosh, the losses are in the billions.
We should 100% not be subsidizing anyone's insurance premiums unless it's tied to other things, like trying to vacate an area experiencing a stepfold change in flooding or something, as that's how we all end up footing the bill for millionaire beachfront insurance instead of those living there footing the bill.
Yep, the Marshall Fire (the Boulder one you referenced) started in brush grass land, and it was a fire that could. not. be. controlled. With no forests in sight. It was all about wind. So yes, any populated area subject to very high wind risk would seem to be at danger.
Invasive exotic species are becoming, are have become, a major element in brush and grasslands. Especially exotic annuals like cheatgrass and brome that thrive in disturbed areas. I’ve read that abandoned sugarcane fields in Maui were covered with exotic plant species that carried the fires there. Combine that with years of disturbance and suppression, and climate change, and development in former wildlands and yeah - you don’t have to be in the woods to be at risk.
I guess (flammable) subdivisions could be considered invasive.
Which is pretty funny because different insurers treat structural losses completely differently, especially in the context of roofing and general contractor overhead and profit, and even more especially where those two areas converge.
Like how much does Safeco profit every year by refusing to include GCOP on all roof-related line items? Nobody else does that shit...except Liberty Mutual, which is the same company.
Oh yeah, damage payment structure and rules is a whole ball of wax and there's a reason those in the industry say pick a good insurer. Not to mention how much adjusting is farmed out to contract firms these days.
Not Geico or general imo. Conundrum probably has a better read on it. Chubb are solid.
I've heard good things about Chubb but last I checked I don't think they were doing business in Montana.
Should I be worried State Farm is losing 20 cents on the dollar or does that just mean they actually pay claims?
State farm is massive and has massive capital reserves. They have to figure shit out, but it's a few years at a minimum before they really need to worry.
FWIW I was told by an Attorney who specializes in insurance claims that Pemco is the best for covering claims. I tried to switch from State Farm a few years ago but the local Pemco agent was a dud so I’m still with State Farm for personal coverage. Need to look into it again.
I had Chubb for my small business and they reluctantly covered a big loss but did cover it after we were sued. No longer with Chubb for business coverage. [emoji23]
Insurance is going to be location dependent and I’m not super up to speed on personal home markets. But, some I think would be decent-Chubb, Cincinnati, Central, and Selective. If you’re in a fire zone and higher cost home, look at Pure. Safeco was a go to but have heard that not as good as it used to be. Nationwide is tanking. Personally, I have Auto Owners and they’re fine but I moved to them when Cincinnati crept their premiums way up over the years. I’d prefer to be with Cincinnati at time of claim-they’re one of the best at paying. These are all thoughts on who I’d want at time of claim.
Not ever experienced a claim with the direct and captive agent companies so don’t know how they’d go. Farmers, State Farm, Geico, AmFam, etc.
State Farm has been quick and fair on their payouts to me for my multiple car wrecks over the years and a brandy new roof when that 75’ pine tree decided it was to tired to stand anymore and took a nap on my house.
Freddie and FHFA to enter secondary mortgage HEL market...
https://www.ft.com/content/1d287e0c-...1-9da157b50101
^^^wanna CnP that for us cheapskates?
https://archive.ph/
You're welcome. :D
Oh dang, I just got it off of a google search and it opened. I sure as shit ain't paying for FT
Here:
3 May 2024
https://www.ft.com/content/1d287e0c-...1-9da157b50101
The writer is chief executive of Meredith Whitney Advisory Group
What if I told you there could be an unprecedented stimulus injection into the US economy that will cost the government nothing and add not $1 to the national deficit? As early as this summer, a proposed move could begin to unleash almost $1tn into consumers’ wallets. By the autumn, it could be on its way to $2tn.
Last month, the government-sponsored mortgage finance agency Freddie Mac filed a proposal with its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to enter into the secondary mortgage market, otherwise known as home equity loans. This was a smart move by Freddie, and the FHFA will do a lot of good by approving it. Despite the more than $32tn in equity on homeowner balance sheets, very little of it has been tapped through home equity loans.
In 2007, just before the financial crisis, there was more than $700bn in home equity loans outstanding. Today, there is roughly $350bn. Home prices have risen more than 70 per cent since then, so why have home equity loans halved?
After the financial crisis, banks have actively taken down their mortgage exposure. Bank of America, for example, has cut its home equity loan portfolio from more than $150bn in 2009 to $25bn. And in 2022, more than 50 per cent of home loans originated from non-traditional operators. These non-bank companies don’t have the balance sheets to hold loans as the banks had traditionally done, so unless they can sell the loans they originate to Freddie, its fellow housing agencies Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae, or private investors, they don’t originate them.
There is a robust and well-oiled mortgage-backed securities machine for first mortgages in which Fannie, Freddie or Ginnie buys mortgages, pools them and sells them as mortgage-backed securities to private investors on the open market, facilitated by Wall Street firms. This process dramatically increases liquidity in the market. None of this liquidity exists in the second mortgage market.
The Freddie Mac proposal could change all that, and it could not come at a better time. Most people in the US are feeling the sting of persistent inflation, but older Americans living on a fixed income have been hit particularly hard. Insurance costs for homeowners have risen well over 11 per cent over three years while they are paying more tax. US property tax revenues have risen 26 per cent over the past three years.
That is probably why seniors have taken on more debt than any other age group over the past few years. Today, they hold 23 per cent of all consumer debt, double their share in 1999. These trends should seem counterintuitive, as typically younger individuals and older individuals would be at either side of the bell curve of total consumer debt outstanding with less debt.
Prior to the financial crisis, this was how the balance of consumer debt was distributed. Now, almost half of all seniors are at risk of a financial shock with less than six weeks of liquid savings. This means that if they face an unexpected medical expense, a sudden home repair or a rapid increase in property taxes and insurance, they have no safety net. This vulnerability makes older adults a highly receptive audience to home equity products, provided they are reasonably priced and relatively easy to access.
The proposed Freddie Mac second mortgage/home equity proposal, if implemented effectively, could be a lifeline for these households, offering them financial flexibility. It sets up guidelines to protect both the borrower and Freddie Mac that are likely to be the template for future moves by Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae. Freddie will only buy the second mortgages of borrowers that it already has a first mortgage with, and the combined loan-to-value of both the first and the second mortgage cannot exceed 80 per cent of the value of the property. The current loan-to-value of Freddie’s mortgage portfolio is 52 per cent. Thus, we estimate Freddie could unlock $980bn in equity for homeowners.
If Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mac follow Freddie Mac’s lead into buying second mortgages, we estimate the secondary home equity loan market could exceed $3tn. By opening up the securitisation market for second mortgages, not only would more institutions be inclined to originate the loans, but the cost to borrowers would meaningfully decline with more finance providers. It would also provide big stimulus to an economy and consumer that appear to be slowing down without adding a dime to government debt. Rarely have I seen such a true win-win scenario for the government, Wall Street and the US consumer.
Just giving ppl more rope to hang themselves.
You have no more money? Here, we created something else for you to borrow against. Go buy 2 more jet skis
I think the idea is to help people get out from under 21% consumer debt down to something more reasonable.
But there will be jet ski buyers for sure...
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/a7/34/9b/a...0511bd2bb5.jpg
jet skis are fun AF
what could possibly go wrong?
so the gov't wants to back up shady lenders before they implode this fall? is that what I'm reading
there must be a reason big banks aren't interested in equity lines of credit.............
That is so sad.
What
The
Fuck
Helocs for everybody!
Attachment 493287
Are the guys who make their living building bitching about this?
Ski buddy helps design and build high end Tahoe homes. He’s starting to get cancellations. Remodeling still strong but they are under 2y wait now.
Apparently someone from the NYTimes read the insurance discussions above and did some further research.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...smid=url-share
Being in second lien position to Fannie or Freddie or anybody, really, is not a great place to be. If/when it goes tits up you either buy them out or write it off, there isn’t much in between. None of those guys care much about downstream lienholders and aren’t worried about your recovery, you’re almost like insurance. If you already have the first you’re just maintaining your LTV position and can manage that ongoing, though.
Also, before 2008 second lien products were frequently written out to 90% or even 100% LTV and most lenders aren’t wandering back out into that deep end of the pool yet. And neither are Fannie and Freddie, it seems.
I haven’t read details on this yet, but curious what the reporting and servicing agreements look like. HELOCs are a bit higher touch than a plain old closed end mortgage.
Good article about what's happening with insurance. Sounds like it is gonna get worse before it gets better. Our neighbors just got dropped by their insurance, Allstate, because they are moving out of Colorado altogether. We are with State Farm, so we will see how long they last. Not looking good for anyone these days.
I was talking the other day with a owner of a largish (for Grand County) HOA/property manager. He said increases in premiums for HOAs (condo complexes with actual common elements) range between 12% and 400%.
He said the primary drivers are claims and deferred maintenance/reserves. I'm no apologist for the insurance industry, but the behavior of these BODs needs to take some responsibility.
In Colorado, you basically need to have a licensed Community Association Manager who, in theory, has been educated on this stuff.
CAM "Hey, your records indicate you haven't you haven't replaced your roof in 30yrs., you had three claims last year. We suggest you at least start budgeting for replacement in your Capital Replacement Plan"
Board "Cool, can you please get us some bids for the next quarterly meeting"
Contractor "That will be about $300k"
Board "Fack, we don't have that money"
CAM "No shit, that why we said you should raise dues, have a special assessment, borrow the money or do something...we should talk about it at the annual meeting"
Homo's at the meeting "[Karens/outrage/fixed income/can't afford it/dumbasses]"
CAM "Yeah, you people suck. We are gonna not renew your contract because our staff hate you because you ignore all professional advise. We'll just replace you with a newer complex with more wealthy owners who ain't afraid to maintain their complex"
Steve and Stacey "I think we should sell, take our equity, maybe buy somewhere new that maybe doesn't suck as bad. I'm sure there is some Conners and Addisons that want to be the first in their friend group to #we've got a place in Fraser"
Realtor "yeah, nobody looks at the HOA finances. The home inspection actually precludes that stuff. I don't bring it up. I've got all kinds of clients that can only afford the older, shitbox condos. I'll make it happen"