https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...94&oe=610A83C1
Printable View
The higher initial IFR estimates at the time, your article says 0.8, assumed a worst-case scenario where severe cases exceed hospital capacity. Fortunately, and for the most part, that didn't happen because people took precautions. In places where it did happen studies show patients were nearly twice as likely to die. And as previously mentioned, mortality rates fell over time as better treatments became avaiblable.
The point being, the numbers people bandy about for things like IFR and CFR aren't fixed in stone but are instead functions with many variables.
Oh FFS. IFR being calculated by people who don't know what a denominator is. (Or lying Russian agents, take your pick.)
We've had a million excess deaths, two thirds of which are known to be COVID. One million is 0.3% of our entire population. We did not have between 200M and 315M infections.
imagine people wanting you to get a vaccine when natural immunity from having Covid works just as well as actually getting the vaccine… and for anyone saying it doesn’t last as long; I’d like to see some proof since neither the virus or the vaccine has been around for over a year… currently, with what we know, they’re damn near the same.
https://www.precisionvaccinations.co...ble-and-robust
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20...-variants.aspx
^ Two glaring issues with the articles:
1) The first article says convalescent COVID-19 patients mount durable antibodies, B cells, and T cells. While that's true, there are also multiples studies showing people with mild or asymptomatic natural infections don't necessarily mount a robust immune response. We also know the immune response from vaccines is much more consistent versus natural infection.
2) The second article compares the CoronaVac or SinoVac vaccine with natural infection, a vaccine that is a lot less effective than the mRNA vaccines.
One reason the CDC hasn't emphasized this point or the media reported it is that AFAIK there aren't good numbers yet for delta. It is undoubtedly true--by orders of magnitude, but numbers would be useful. Maybe they're out there; can't say I've knocked myself out looking for them.
barely worth pointing this out - but 99.7 would be fatal cancer not just cancer. The odds are much greater that you'll be infected w/ COVID, experience symptoms, maybe develop disease, maybe have longer term effects, infect others and yes...a smaller percentage will die.
Edit to add: if, instead of a treatment, there was a cancer vaccine that would prevent a .3% fatal cancer I'd take that in a hot minute. My generation missed out the HPV vax which would be a better analog here.
Not quite sure what that’s supposed to be a picture of… I haven’t been sick since I originally had Covid, my symptoms were basic runny nose/cough and had I not gotten tested, I probably wouldn’t have even knew I had Covid… I’ll take my chances with the Covid again through natural immunity over getting an EUA vaccine…
That is a pic from South Park when the men of current time try to reduce the population in the future by 'going gay" . So its a pile of naked men getting the pink jab. Is that the way you're going to get a booster?? I'd rather my arm hurt a bit rather than my butt, but that just me.
This is in a way that precovid argument of getting childhood diseases rather than getting the shot like MRR etc. If everyone had to get covid the natural way then the death rate would be what 10 times higher and masking etc would last 10 times longer just to not overwhelm the health care system. If the vaccines had failed then that is at least a logic path. Get the young and healthy infected on purpose in order to protect the vulnerable.
So, once they are not EUA, will you be getting one? Or will the goal posts and qualifiers continue to shift?
This goes like:
"It's EUA, I don't trust it."
to
"Even thos it's not EUA, well, I have natural immunity."
to
Well, even tho vax + past infection resistance = best preventative science.. we'll be back to "I don't trust it"
Nothing but disingenuous bullshit.
I love your whatabout-isms… it’s almost like you can’t form an argument either. Holy fuckkkk. It’s okay though, I’m just patiently waiting for this whole thing to get out of control again so you can complain about people dying and nobody caring… oh wait; that’s what all the vaccinated are saying now! If you haven’t gotten a vaccine, fuck you! I need my freedumbs
lol at the guy who says Covid-19 hasn't been around for over a year. So I guess this is the nineteenth version of covid?
re: that stupid q meme, christ people are idiots. The 99.7% it refers to isn't the "chance" of not being infected with covid. If we continue on our current path the "chance" is 100% that every single living American will get it.
Chemo is a treatment not a prophylactic. There are about 2 million new cancer cases per year in the US. That's a little more than half of one percent of the population, yet if a general cancer vaccine were invented, almost everyone would take it.
The meme text is also grammatically incorrect, and contains a word that doesn't actually exist.
Strong work, tards. Strong work.
Here’s how we get the Trumptards vaxxed:
We send a hard drive to Mike Lindell with emails showing Killery masterminded the plot to trick red blooded patriotic Americans into not getting the shots.
IT’s a LIB plot to kill Republicans! Demoncrats plotted to con them to not get vaccinated from the shots that gives immunization against the virus that the Dems / Fauci released to plot socialism taking away Medicare and Medicaid!!
Own the Libs, get vaxed!!!
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums