I probably should have soundly reprimanded her, she didnt have her own kids but i think your take away was sposed to be that speaking as a teacher they line them up and stick them in grade schoolQuote:
Originally Posted by bennymac
Printable View
I probably should have soundly reprimanded her, she didnt have her own kids but i think your take away was sposed to be that speaking as a teacher they line them up and stick them in grade schoolQuote:
Originally Posted by bennymac
The CA Waldorf people (ime* neither soccermoms nor hippies, even if they crunch) have long driven antivax stuff but the torch has been taken since covid for being against every vax along partisan lines.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcski
*not soccermoms because they didn’t let the kids do competitive sports, not hippies because they made too much money.
2nd Gen hippies.
Dentist Hippies?
I know/knew Waldorf moms that re-registered republican when vax requirements schools were bumped up in California.
And of course we know that Facebook and YouTube algorithms exploit and amplify confirmation bias.Quote:
Originally Posted by californiagrown
... Thom
Do we need a Measles thread? With RFK in charge, maybe we need an infectious disease forum.
Quote:
Gaines County is the epicenter of the measles outbreak with at least 45 confirmed cases. The county had the highest unvaccinated rate in the state this school year at 18 percent, according to state health data.
As of Friday, the confirmed number of measles cases in Texas reached 90, making this the worst measles outbreak in 30 years.
Measles was declared eradicated in the United States in 2000. This was achieved through a successful vaccination program that ensured high levels of immunity in the population.
^no need for a thread, just follow VanMan tallow on IG
As if Texas doesn't have enough brain-damaged people already.
Our march towards Idiocracy continues
While it is amusing to think of getting a handy at StarFucks, the movie was not supposed to be an instruction manual.Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn
Speaking of idiocracy: https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/26/healt...ity/index.html
Vitamin A supplements might be a good idea if you live somewhere like a third world country and you have Vitamin A deficiency. But otherwise it’s the standard paleo hoax bullshit. More is not better.
How come god was not on the job thru all this ?
She was.
Getting booster, rabies and two others in the next 7 days.
Read an article in one of the paywalled sites the other day--lots of people who have had covid WITHOUT any apparent long term symptoms have significant cognitive loss. That would explain a lot. It could explain Biden, it could explain Trump. It could explain my wife. It could explain me. Looking around me with that in mind I see a whole lot of craziness it could explain. Not that most people weren't crazy before but there is definitely a different vibe in the society now. A lot has been blamed on isolation, loss of learning for the kids, etc but maybe it's not just psychosocial, maybe it's virus in the brain, which is better than a worm in your brain but bad enough. Like the PTSD in soldiers that turns out to be TBI in many cases.It could explain the last election.
It could also explain the forum problems
It could also explain the forum problems if covid got into the servers.
If you believe a muffin fan can get covid you might be a readneck
I've personaly had so many vax i can't walk thru a metal door way without sticking to it but my medical consultant tells me I am so fuckin old i don't need the measles
FDA’s Peter Marks Steps Down, Warns of ‘Lies’ & 'Misinformation'
Writer: Param Malik
Param Malik
22 hours ago
4 min read
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A seismic shift has rocked the FDA as Peter Marks, the agency's influential director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), has announced his resignation, effective April 5th, 2025.
“It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary [RFK Jr.], but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies,” Marks wrote in a letter to acting FDA Commissioner Sara Brenner, a copy of which was obtained by HealthcareInsights.
The abrupt departure of Marks, an individual widely regarded as the driving force behind the FDA's progressive approach to gene and cell therapies, has sent shockwaves through the biotech sector and is raising critical questions about the future of regulatory oversight in United States healthcare.
According to his letter, Marks' exit is not merely a personal decision. He used the occasion to decry the "unprecedented assault on scientific truth" that he felt was impacting public health and was a battle he waged daily against a relentless tide of misinformation from the new DHSS leadership.
Marks, who has led CBER since 2016, has been instrumental in shaping the regulatory landscape for groundbreaking therapies, balancing scientific innovation with patient safety. For over eight years, Marks stood as a bulwark against the rising tide of skepticism, steering CBER through unprecedented medical advancement and public health crises.
Under his leadership, the FDA greenlit landmark gene therapies, marking tangible progress in treating previously intractable diseases. This includes approvals like Yescarta and Luxturna, pioneering treatments for certain cancers and inherited blindness. Marks also spearheaded CBER's efforts to streamline the development of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, playing a crucial role in Operation Warp Speed.
His departure will leave both of the FDA’s principal drug review offices without a permanent leader, following the resignation of Patrizia Cavazzoni, former Director of the Center for Drug Evaluation & Research (CDER), in January.
The implications of Marks' departure are far-reaching, as the FDA grapples with the increasing strain of federal staffing and budget cuts. These constraints have already stretched agency resources, and the loss of a key leader like Marks further exacerbates the challenge of maintaining regulatory efficiency and expertise.
And the departure of such a prominent figure, a figure who stood at the very nexus of scientific rigor and public trust, raises chilling questions about the effect of our current political climate on the very institutions designed to protect us. It’s a reminder that the institutions designed to safeguard public health are increasingly vulnerable to the corrosive influence of political opportunism. The loss of his expertise, a voice of reason in a cacophony of doubt, leaves a void that threatens to undermine the FDA's ability to fulfill its core mission: to protect and promote public health.
The search for Marks' successor becomes a litmus test for the nation's commitment to scientific integrity. In a moment where the very foundations of trust are under siege, the FDA must not only fill a vacancy but also reaffirm its commitment to evidence-based decision-making.
The agency's ability to maintain public trust in vaccine safety and efficacy is now front and center. With Mark's departure, a critical voice has been silenced. As the FDA searches for a successor, American health and science stand at a precipice.