Enforcer 110 Feedback Needed
Picked up some 191 Enforcer 110s out of the Asogear Black Friday screw up with the intent of replacing my 190 QLabs as my daily driver with them as a little more playful chargerish. I'm getting tempted by some other skis ( Moment Wildcat 108, K2 Mindbender 108, Blizzard Rustler 11). I've searched and didn't see any mag reviews of the Enforcer 110. Anyone skiing them?
Me - 6'2", 190. Like 190ish skis with backbone. Ski in PNW with heavier snow. On paper it seems like a good fit for me by keeping some chargeability but a little lighter/more maneuverable than my QLab. I have a 192 LP105 for when I want a no speed limit crud destroyer.
Enforcer 110 Feedback Needed
Skied my 191’s this morning. Since conditions were limited, I didn’t take it off trail, so I only have soft groomer performance to report. I found it intuitive, fun, and capable. Very much like a 10-mm wider Enforcer 100.
I think the flex profile that Blister shared in their review is spot on. A soft tip that stiffens gradually as you get to the middle of the ski, which is stiff and solid, then fairly stiff behind the heel piece and a tad softer in the tail. Not a noodle, but not a beast either. The front of the ski and the sidecut did remind me of the QLab. The tail is different (much more rockered) but not as soft as I was expecting. The QLab is a race room ski with thicker sheets of metal and the Enforcer 110 is a much more accessible ski, but in the same ilk. I really didn’t expect to like it as much as I did. I have an Enforcer Pro, but think I like the 110 better. Just easier to ski and so versatile. I could see this being the perfect travel ski or West Coast one-ski quiver. I get all the fuss behind this ski, as it will work for a wide range of abilities. Also, the 191 was perfect for me at 5’8”-195-lbs. I think the 185 would feel too short.
Enforcer 110 Feedback Needed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
phatty
Don't say that! Those were what I wanted, but ended up with the 110 when they sold out of the 104.
The 104 is an amazing ski. It feels like they took a Blizzard Bonafide, made it a tad wider and gave it tail rocker. Another way of saying it is these are what I think a lot of us hoped the Rustler 10 would be...they remind me of a narrower Rustler 11 that is a little more damp. Definitely the best Enforcer of the line for me. Feels the most stable but still so easy to ski. I get why they are updating the 94 and 100 with the new construction. It’s going to make those skis better, too.
The only Enforcer I don’t own is the 88. Have spent lots of time on the 93, 100, and Pro before getting on the 110 and 104 this past week.
Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
Enforcer 110 Feedback Needed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bandit Man
The 104 is an amazing ski. It feels like they took a Blizzard Bonafide, made it a tad wider and gave it tail rocker. Another way of saying it is these are what I think a lot of us hoped the Rustler 10 would be...they remind me of a narrower Rustler 11 that is a little more damp. Definitely the best Enforcer of the line for me. Feels the most stable but still so easy to ski. I get why they are updating the 94 and 100 with the new construction. It’s going to make those skis better, too.
The only Enforcer I don’t own is the 88. Have spent lots of time on the 93, 100, and Pro before getting on the 110 and 104 this past week.
Sent from my iPad using
TGR Forums
I have the 110 in a 191. I’ll add my thoughts in the next post.
But given your extensive enforcer experience you can probably answer my question.
With the 104 191 length would I essentially get the rocker profile of the 110 in a slightly narrower and tighter turn radius geometry, with similar construction, and also with stiffer tips and tails than the 110? As I understand the tips and tails of the 104 are actually stiffer than the 100, does that seem right from your experience?