The more I think about it the more I like the idea of a skinny Q for a one ski do it all. Might be my next custom order.
Printable View
The more I think about it the more I like the idea of a skinny Q for a one ski do it all. Might be my next custom order.
Correct. I'm somewhere between new school and old school. I ski centered to forward, but i don't ram my shins against the front of my boot and i hate the backseat. At -1, the tip floats. At 0 they dive
I'm forced to accept-1.5 for my move to kingpins on your old 192's , chicken. I was really hoping for-1.
[emoji6]
GPO (std. Layup)
Yes -1
(Stand on them in your living room barefoot at -1 & the dot if your scared)
#1 Do anything, really everything, everyday & ski like a champ.
#2 More of an All Mtn Slay Machines than Powder ski . All you pussies thinking -1, it needs to be skinnier, and walla, nope already walla. Skies powder well and has some nice rocker for feel. Stable comp winning platform across all potential snow conditions. Loves soft snow. Rails on Groomers at 70.
#3 Wins - If you are a real deal skier you will have that feeling too.
Now for the Q.....Does it do the POW Like I really wish the GPO would?
Always think about what ifs ...CCR version or Crazy Jims Customs. Or Woos, now the BC's +1.
BC's +1 mapC 4 flex would do a lot quite nice I'd think. #overlapoverload
First World Sierra Nevada Problems.
Have not bought a sub 100 ski for a Decade. TETO
Someone with the 188s - weights?
Thanks. The answer is 4405 grams for the pair. Search function blows, as everybody knows.
What do you all think about a narrower Q?
I'm looking to add a 183 MVP because I love my pj's and I'd like a wider stiffer one to compliment the pj. Spring ski with some jam. Hoping the spring sale happens this year. If there was a 183 skinny Q option(108) that would bump the MVP from the top of my list