Results 1 to 25 of 121
-
05-21-2012, 11:58 PM #1Cham-wow!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Oz
- Posts
- 944
'Snow Beacon' Avalanche Transmitter
Hohes had hinted at the arrival of this product some time ago.
It's a low cost avalanche transmitter only (no search mode).
Affordable backcountry safety or irresponsible device?
Here are my thoughts.
http://aussieskier.com/index.php/201...e-transmitter/
-
05-22-2012, 12:11 AM #2
I wouldn't be caught dead with one
-
05-22-2012, 12:20 AM #3
Whose fucking idea was this? I want their knee caps broken & I hope they never again get to enjoy the wonders of backcountry travel. This has got be as dumb as the iPhone app...
Life is simple. Go Explore.
-
05-22-2012, 12:30 AM #4
Extremely bad idea when marketed like that. People will die.
If you don't want to read the blog: http://www.snow-beacon.com/
Hey, but they have a beacon that has a search mode under development... it'll be marketed to SAR
However, if you have the desire and are physically capable of rescuing your partner who’s caught in an avalanche, we can set you up with the right equipment at a price you cannot ignore.
In our dedicated Search and Rescue section, you can find probes and aluminum snow shovels that compliment our unique locator system, including our very own “M0LE”.Last edited by Summit; 05-22-2012 at 12:44 AM.
Originally Posted by blurred
-
05-22-2012, 12:52 AM #5
Not a good idea.
When would this kind of thing be put to good use?simen@downskis.com DOWN SKIS
-
05-22-2012, 01:06 AM #6
At no point does the potential for good outcomes outweigh the potential for bad.
There's a damned good reason that all the other beacon manufacturers have not created a product like this and marketed it to the entry level backcountry user.
Will we have to be so specific now to ask "do you have a a transceiver?" instead of "do you have beacon?"
Beacon check? What's that? Who needs to do a beacon check if you can't search anyways...Originally Posted by blurred
-
05-22-2012, 01:13 AM #7
Step 1) Go to their webpage. Click on the 'Contact Us' link.
Step 2) Write message telling them how awful and unethical these beacons are.
Step 3) Press send and then go to their Facebook page and publicly comment about the stupidity of having one of these beacons.
Do you think flooding their inbox with a ton of messages against this beacon will make them change their product?........probably not but could be fun to try and wake them up
-
05-22-2012, 01:30 AM #8Cham-wow!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Oz
- Posts
- 944
I linked my blog to their facebook but they marked the post as Spam.
-
05-22-2012, 01:31 AM #9Cham-wow!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Oz
- Posts
- 944
-
05-22-2012, 02:41 AM #10
Brosia posits that an engineer who has good book smarts, but not common sense, decided to create a solution to a problem he didn't actually bother to properly understand by taking an avalanche class or asking an avalanche professional.
Inventor James Aubrey Robson is an avalanche JONG. This is a much easier idea to accept than Businessman James Aubrey Robson being an unethical greedy fucktard.
How the hell did he get so far without being told by everyone and their brother that this is a horrible idea?Originally Posted by blurred
-
05-22-2012, 05:21 AM #11Cham-wow!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Oz
- Posts
- 944
I'd like to think you're right about the JONG part. I'm sure it's not a malicious invention, however poorly thought out.
-
05-22-2012, 06:34 AM #12
no good will come of this.
In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...
-
05-22-2012, 07:55 AM #13Gel-powered Tech bindings
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Amherst, Mass.
- Posts
- 4,684
I've always found it kind of interesting that each alpine nation has had one and only one avy beacon company (at any one time), which kind of reflects the national character:
- Skadi = A research lab in Western NY designed the first effective avy beacon . . . but then the Euros adopted a different frequency.
- Ramer = Dared to be the different and super innovative American, going up against the stodgy Euros.
- BCA = Inherited Ramer's mantle and totally changed the stodgy Euro beacon design by adding a second antenna and digital processing for directional information. (USA! USA!)
- Ortovox = All sorts of German high-tech innovation.
- Barryvox = Swiss sophistication.
- ARVA = Some good models, some not-so-good, and over the years has sometimes been ahead of the tech curve, sometimes behind . . . has historically shown little interest in selling beacons outside of France, especially in the U.S.
- Pieps = Okay, so I can't think of any relevant Austrian stereotype.
- SOS = Lame knockoff of Ortovox F1 (even the model name too -- F1-ND, hah, Find, get it ... how not-so-clever) and now defunct ... doesn't Canada deserve better than this?
- Fitre = Italian, dropped out of the beacon market long ag.
- Snow-be = For the sake of Australia, I sure hope this isn't symbolic of the national culture and/or technological state.
That said, all that's new about this is the price and marketing. Ortovox previously had the D2, and somebody else had a similar model, but they were marketed toward dogs (bad!) and finding your tent or gear stash in super-harsh weather conditions. (SOS had a special version of its F1-ND with a separate frequency for finding your sled, Pieps now has a separate-frequency beacon for finding your dog.) The Pieps Backup transmit-only device is intended to, well, back up any regular transceiver that lacks an emergency revert mode, and although it could be misused by itself, Pieps has the Freeride which like the name implies is intended for those more focused on being found that finding -- plus it's lighter than the Snow-be (when slipped into a pocket w/o its harness, which is the only option for the Snow-be), about the same size, and although more expensive, still way cheaper than any other beacon.
The only good thing about the Snow-be is the significant cost savings if you wanted to build your own beacon park with lots of transmitters, and you didn't have access to lots of discarded cheap old beacons.
The FAQ puts on a pretty interesting spin. Maybe I'm missing something, but I didn't see any suggestion anywhere in the website that if you're skiing so often in terrain with avalanche potential that you feel compelled the purchase a transmit-only device yet "are not capable of being involved in a rescue" then perhaps you should invest some time/effort/money in becoming capable?
Question: If I only carry a transmitter (snow-be) am I just being selfish?
Answer: No. If you are not capable of being involved in a rescue or, with your presence you put yourself or others at greater risk because of your involvement including delaying the rescue, it may safer for all if you move away from an incident to a place of safety.Mo' skimo here: NE Rando Race Series
-
05-22-2012, 08:22 AM #14Cham-wow!
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Oz
- Posts
- 944
-
05-22-2012, 08:46 AM #15
Time to implement the safety check gear swap...
-
05-22-2012, 08:48 AM #16AF
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Sandy by the front
- Posts
- 2,345
My experience is that even a dope who has no search ability has value during a rescue. Moving snow away from the burial site, initially looking for gloves or a pole sticking up, I can find something for them to do. This is a real bad idea and I can see more and more novices wearing these in bounds and in the event of a slide, such as Snowbird had two years ago not having the sense to turn off their beacon while patrol tries to search for a signal. I am not going anywhere with someone that has one of these pieces of shit on.
-
05-22-2012, 10:21 AM #17Question: If I only carry a transmitter (snow-be) am I just being selfish?
Answer: No. If you are not capable of being involved in a rescue or, with your presence you put yourself or others at greater risk because of your involvement including delaying the rescue, it may safer for all if you move away from an incident to a place of safety.
-
05-22-2012, 10:33 AM #18
The awful message Snow Beacon is transmitting with their product is that people do not need the tools to rescue others, even in theory. They are teaching that people need not even have a desire to help their backcountry partners. That is an awful ethic to promote; it is against the ethics promoted by avalanche educators worldwide.
Originally Posted by blurred
-
05-22-2012, 10:33 AM #19Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Chamonix
- Posts
- 1,012
Maybe good for kids to carry? I mean pre-teen, unable to help with rescue. Still, the potential benefit of that use doesn't outweigh the risk caused in the hands of JONGs.
-
05-22-2012, 10:34 AM #20
-
05-22-2012, 10:39 AM #21
-
05-22-2012, 10:41 AM #22
I can teach an 11 year old to use a modern beacon quite easily. They pick it up faster than adults. They can shovel too.
I'd avoid the mental trap of trying to think of some hypothetical market micro-niche that would be ethical to market to when Snow Beacon is NOT doing that. They are marketing to entry-level backcountry users and every tourist on the hill.Originally Posted by blurred
-
05-22-2012, 10:44 AM #23
-
05-22-2012, 10:50 AM #24Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Chamonix
- Posts
- 1,012
The problem is, the product will sell. People will buy into the marketing. Shops will want to stock a product that they know will sell. It's like a Recco patch, plus potential consequences. Look at how many manufacturers are putting Recco into their products, because the public buys into the idea.
-
05-22-2012, 10:55 AM #25
Everything that Recco did right, this company is doing wrong.
PNW... I don't understand either of your posts. Drink your coffee, then reread the thread. Jonathan was quoting and this product has NO SEARCH mode.Originally Posted by blurred
Bookmarks