Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 179

Thread: Review: 2011 Salomon Quest 12 AT Boot

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,648

    Review: 2011 Salomon Quest 12 AT Boot

    Skier:
    Age: 23
    Height: 6’
    Weight: 210 Lbs
    Skiing since: I can remember, 18 years or so.
    Skier type: I hate trying to write what type of skier I am, so lets say expert, cause that can cover a wide range.
    Location: Alta, UT 1/31/10
    Skis: Moment Bibby Pro 186
    Weather: Snow.
    Every Day boots: 09 Salomon Impact 10, 26.5, slight forefoot modifications, Full Tilt (Intuition) Pro Liners, medial pads, A-Line foot beds.
    Touring Boot: Scarpa Denali XT, 26.5, Intuition liners, A-Lines, Modified Dalbello Black tongues.

    Boot under Review: 2011 Salomon Quest 12 AT Boot, Salomon’s 120 flex, 3 Buckle answer to the Black Diamond Factor, a damn good competitor. 308 BSL.



    Initial Opinion:

    Shell/Exterior

    When I saw these for the first time, I was very impressed with how they looked. I first noticed the 3 buckle design, with a very large buckle on the upper foot, as well as very large booster strap. The boots reminded me of an altered SPK, by appearance, but as soon as I got a closer look, I realized this was not the case. With a very distinct, and burly looking walk mode switch and mechanism, an amazing looking DIN sole, with plenty of traction, as well as rubber traction under the arch of the foot as well, a nice touch for walking on rocky ridgelines, etc.



    Left walk mode activated, right ski mode



    Walk Mode Activated



    Another feature that was nice was the adjustment of the plastic cuff on the front of the boot. It has a higher or lower setting, so you can have more or less plastic on the front of the boot. I did not play around with this as I only got a very short time to play with this boot, but looks like it could be useful.


    First (lower) line says +20, Upper says + 30

    The replaceable soles are very easy to change out, 2 screws in the toe piece, 3 in the heel, and 4 in the heel of the AT/Dynafit compatible sole.

    Liner

    The liner was sort of a hybrid of a couple of different Salomon liners from this season. It features My Customfit Pro moldable liner, as well as the new technology from this year, Biovent, which actually works to help evacuate moisture from the boot; basically a turbofan meets capaliene for your feet, with no batteries. Another nice feature of the liner is the quick laces starting at the forefoot/ankle area up the front, allowing you to tighten the liner around your calf, similar to the BD Factor, only using a different system, which, unfortunately, looks much more flimsy than the BOA on the Factor. However, Salomon has been using this lace system on some of their SPK’s, their snowboard boots, and some trail shoes, so if my memory serves, you will be able to get replacements if anything were to happen.




    Some background on my hooves:

    I have been in Salomon boots for 7 years, and their size 26.5 boots for 4.5 years. With minor modifications in the forefoot (1st and 5th Met punches, nothing too major) I have found these boots to treat me very well for my 50-day seasons. I had been on the X Wave 9 for 4 years, had it riveted to a 10 flex, and enjoyed that boot, but it was flexed out. I got Impact 10’s this year and put intuition liners in, had the first and fifth met punched, and added medial pads on the liners, and have been incredibly happy, as have my feet.

    On the feet:



    Putting on this boot for the first time, I was a little nervous, as I did not know how the last compared to the Impact, nor the volume. As soon as I got my foot inside, I knew I could be happy in this boot for every day with slight modifications, which I will discuss in a second. Initially, the toe box felt amazingly roomy, and did not notice any initial pressure points in the boots.

    Standing inside of Goldminer’s, I felt as though the boots were noticeably softer than my Impact’s, but as soon as I stepped outside and let them adjust to the cold weather, they were stiffer. Felt like a fairly true 120, compared to my 110 Impact’s.

    Using the walk mode only to walk around the lodge, it felt quite nice, stiffer than my Scarpa’s in walk mode, but felt as though it would be fine for any length skin.

    Skiing:

    These boots are awesome. Hands down my choice over the Factor as 1. They fit my feet, and 2. They are softer than the factor. I have found that a 110 flex boot is plenty, this 120 was noticeably stiffer, but allowed me to drive my skis better, and felt as though it would not be overbearing as a touring boot. The response was nice, and the lace up liner did not provide any comfort issue, and felt as though it actually held my calf better than my intuitions. The skiing was great, all around stiff alpine boot great, not to mention the Alta 4 inches we had received the night before.

    Verdict:

    Having a boot like this or the Factor makes a ton of sense, as it performs so well as a traditional Alpine boot, and would kill it on a set of Dynafits, or any other touring set up for that matter. I have wanted to go Dynafit, and this seems like the perfect option, as the Factor, the ZZeus, and the Scarpa’s do not really fit my foot that well. Needless to say I was fairly excited with the out of the box comfort and fit of these boots, as most of the time I have to modify something to make my foot happy.
    Overall, I was thoroughly stoked on this boot, and am seriously considering this as a boot upgrade for next season.
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,495
    weight???

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Right Coast transplant
    Posts
    3,063
    whats the last on these things?

    im interested, its been a long time since ive been in a solly boot, and my kryp pros arnt doing the trick anymore
    Live

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,648
    knew i forgot something, but lighter than the Impacts, for sure, no weight as i did not have scale, so i am unsure, noticeably lighter than the impacts, heavier than my denali xt's.
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,461
    sexy.

    but what he said VVV

    Quote Originally Posted by skiingsamurai View Post
    whats the last on these things?
    98-100mm? (fingers crossed)
    In search of the elusive artic powder weasel ...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,520
    1) I'm not sure of the last but....

    if the impacts (100) fit him with a few, minor punches, then this must be 100-101ish. From all other info this is NOT the falcon (98) shape


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,648
    I believe they are right around 100, The extra roomy toe box(see more roomy than my intuitions molded with a toe cap) may have led me to have some mistaken feelings for how wide they are. I can easily see them being 99 or 100. Not a Falcon based boot, I feel these are more SPK/Impact combined influence, as it felt similar to a shogun when I put it on my foot. Hard to tell as I only put my foot in a shogun for 10 minutes, and 4 runs in these boots. If your foot is a Salomon Impact shape, this boot will be the tits for a stiff AT option.
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    103
    I tried one on while at Larry's in Boulder and he said the last is a 102.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,897
    Comor in Whistler just got a few pairs in, for sale. The guy I talked to has his own test pair and is loving them, hes claiming 100mm last.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    CB!
    Posts
    2,974
    My 26.5 sally feet have foot-boners. WANT.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,520
    Quote Originally Posted by robnow View Post
    Comor in Whistler just got a few pairs in, for sale. The guy I talked to has his own test pair and is loving them, hes claiming 100mm last.

    what sizes? down to a 25 shell?


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    InDaPow, CO
    Posts
    483
    Quote Originally Posted by bfly View Post
    I tried one on while at Larry's in Boulder and he said the last is a 102.
    Does Larry have these in stock? I'm thinking he doesn't but if you/anyone said he had a 26.5 for sale, I'd drive there and camp out by the door.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,408
    Good write up Phall...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    BZ
    Posts
    254
    Great info. It looks like a sick boot!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    EastaLasVegas
    Posts
    66
    101 "last"

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    409
    Quote Originally Posted by Phall View Post
    Weight: 210 Lbs
    Someone hops on the scale before RJs not after.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,408
    Quote Originally Posted by salida View Post
    Someone hops on the scale before RJs not after.

    BWHAHAHAHAHAHA...he said yer fat.....


    nice one.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    I've been skiing the Salomon Quest for the last couple of weeks. I like the design but they are heavy with the stock liner. I also felt that are sized big and have a pretty high volume last. The boot board is flat, which is good for standing more upright and the softer flex is nicer since I'm not a heavy guy.
    Now, where are their new AT bindings? Hmmm?
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    InDaPow, CO
    Posts
    483
    Quote Originally Posted by DropCliffsNotBombs View Post
    I've been skiing the Salomon Quest for the last couple of weeks.
    So where does one "formerly in the industry, but not anymore" go to acquire this boot asap?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,733
    What's the heel pocket shaped like?

    You mentioned there is an AT/ Dynafit sole as well -- is that confirmed for production? (esp. interested in the Dynafit/tech fitting inserts)
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    T-town, CO. USA
    Posts
    2,098
    Quote Originally Posted by LivinCO View Post
    So where does one "formerly in the industry, but not anymore" go to acquire this boot asap?
    I got mine from Salomon for testing. They only came in my size. Sorry.
    The heel pocket seems snug, like most Salomons. The upper (single) buckle is HUGE! It takes the place of the usual two upper cuff buckles. They also have a massive (booster-like) power strap!
    Leave No Turn Unstoned!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,733
    Quote Originally Posted by DropCliffsNotBombs View Post
    They also have a massive (booster-like) power strap!
    Is it stretchy/elastic like the Booster strap?
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,408
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    What's the heel pocket shaped like?

    You mentioned there is an AT/ Dynafit sole as well -- is that confirmed for production? (esp. interested in the Dynafit/tech fitting inserts)
    This is confirmed and these boots are available already in YURP...

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,107
    Thanks for the review, these things sound excellent. I am extremely excited about this boot. Will definitely have to pop into Comor and take a look. My 03' pro models are in need of replacement quite soon.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sandy, Utah
    Posts
    14,408
    The only issues i could see with this boot and its direct competitors is that it only has a walk mode and 1 lean mode. Most of its competition have 2 ski modes for lean.

    And I hear the price point is slightly higher than the competition, but that has yet to be confirmed. Would be a huge mistake to go higher than its direct competition, not many people think of sallie when they think of touring, this would hurt their sales if they are pricing themselves out of the market.

    just my $.02.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •