Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 150
  1. #101
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    colorady
    Posts
    1,318
    Abasin announces plan to open Beavers/Steep Gullies: Posts map with "hike-back" option and limited opening next season.
    http://arapahoebasin.com/Abasin/moun...llies.aspx#map


  2. #102
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    I-70 West
    Posts
    4,684
    Sweet! Looks like the terrain below the Alleys is in play.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871
    Sweet! Can't wait to hit traverse track ruts in the middle of one of the gullies!

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the swamp
    Posts
    11,171

    abasin expansion

    Where's the traverse in the middle of the alleys? Isn't it at the bottom?

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    colorady
    Posts
    1,318
    So fucking dumb that they can't put a lift in to service the whole area. A ski area expecting it's clientele to skin back to the lift after accessing the best terrain is pathetic. Al can't even fuck it up right.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871
    SnowShow, look at the gates. Now imagine lazy fucks who don't want to hike 30 minutes out. Ski the top half, traverse out. They need to not put gates there.

    Quote Originally Posted by ULLRismyco-pilot View Post
    So fucking dumb that they can't put a lift in to service the whole area. A ski area expecting it's clientele to skin back to the lift after accessing the best terrain is pathetic. Al can't even fuck it up right.
    There might have been environmental impact restrictions at the bottom. Its a major waterway.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,675
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    SnowShow, look at the gates. Now imagine lazy fucks who don't want to hike 30 minutes out. Ski the top half, traverse out. They need to not put gates there.



    There might have been environmental impact restrictions at the bottom. Its a major waterway.
    The same waterway that is riddled with mining waste and flows directly under multiple lifts and a village in Keystone?

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,234
    I think it looks sweet but I'm not a local.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    I-70 West
    Posts
    4,684

    abasin expansion

    At this point in the planning process, I can't imagine that those gate locations are accurate.

    That would be a nasty fucking traverse across the gullies.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    6,404
    I'd presume they are going to attempt to keep people from crossing the yellow boundary line, aka hitchhiking back?

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    colorady
    Posts
    1,318
    No more hitchhiking, which is currently much faster than hiking/skinning back to Pali.

    Parking has been so bad up there this year. Can't imagine it'll get any better with an expansion.

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the swamp
    Posts
    11,171

    abasin expansion

    I'm torn: easier lift access from the chutes = way more people in there vs. the ability to lap that area easier and really get into it without a pain in the ass skin or hike back out.

    I don't ski that sidecountry but I'm sure there are some pissed off people who do.

  13. #113
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,234
    I doubt there is going to be a cop stationed down there telling you that you can't hitch hike.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  14. #114
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    385
    double has to be twice as fast

  15. #115
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    BROulder
    Posts
    2,884

    abasin expansion

    I am cool with Abasin building this expansion since I am a backcountry whimp and rarely ski anything too gnar in the backcountry - this expansion really does not impact me at all. If anything I will now be able to ski lines I never dared to ski before!

    I think this is good - the pow will now get tracked out more slowly on pow days and people will be more spread out around the mountain.

    I am more curious about where ABasin expects to park all of these people!! The lots are already full a lot of the time, even when the mountain doesn't seem that busy.

    Also, why are they getting rid of the Norway chair?!? That lift is actually much more convenient and a little bit faster than Lenawee. It doesn't make any sense to remove Norway. That lift is a good alternative on busy days and is much more convenient to access this new terrain and Zuma cornice / west wall.

  16. #116
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    There might have been environmental impact restrictions at the bottom. Its a major waterway.
    Not sure why the EPA would give a shit about a lift there. Heck, due to massive pollution, Keystone has to restock the trout every spring to be able to keep fly fishing on their list of guest activities.

  17. #117
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,675
    Below where they are putting the lift, and their yellow line, is some pretty decent terrain. Their excuse for not putting the lift all the way to the bottom was that they couldn't offer a green or blue slope all the way down to the lift. I call BS. They also said that there is less snow below that level, once again BS. I do believe that they were just too cheap to deal with mitigating the wetlands area at the bottom.

  18. #118
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,675
    Below where they are putting the lift, and their yellow line, is some pretty decent terrain. Their excuse for not putting the lift all the way to the bottom was that they couldn't offer a green or blue slope all the way down to the lift. I call BS. They also said that there is less snow below that level, once again BS. I do believe that they were just too cheap to deal with mitigating the wetlands area at the bottom.

  19. #119
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,871

    abasin expansion

    Exactly. Enviro impact restrictions.

  20. #120
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,644
    Quote Originally Posted by ULLRismyco-pilot View Post
    So fucking dumb that they can't put a lift in to service the whole area. A ski area expecting it's clientele to skin back to the lift after accessing the best terrain is pathetic. Al can't even fuck it up right.
    A truly constructive comment. Clearly you were involved in the planning and environmental impact process ...NOT.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  21. #121
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,686
    We got it, your name is Thom (you don't need to add it every time you post)

    ...Drew

  22. #122
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Reno, eNVy
    Posts
    569
    You guys need to stop bitching. Its gonna be dope as shit

  23. #123
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Golden,co
    Posts
    6
    I'm stoked there's no lift at the bottom. a 15 minute hike is worth every step if it will keep snow back there a few days after a storm. same as lightning trees....no body skis them, the 8 minute hike out to Zuma is too much.

    The plan is perfect for those of us who aren't afraid to earn our turns. quit bitching that a giant moving couch isn't available at every inch of the resort to sweep your fat a$$ off the mountain and whisk you back to the top of the groomers.

  24. #124
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Golden,co
    Posts
    6
    ULLRismyco-pilot:

    If you'd have bother to read the actual post on the site, you'd quickly realize it wasnt the "dumb fu*cks" at Basin making the call, but a concession to even allow the project to go forward in the first place. If you are able to read more than a few paragraphs in one sitting, have a look here and you can find out why. if reading 11 pages is too much for ya, here's a short bulletpoint on why:

    The Beavers chairlift alignment was proposed specifically to keep the bottom lift terminal off the valley floor and out of the high-quality habitat in the riparian area.

    Bitch all you want about the "high quality riparian area" but don't blame Basin for it. chat with your local forest service buddy.

    I for one am happy they allowed Basin to expand into that territory at all, they could have said no-go and F-U.

    Doosch.

  25. #125
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    9,356
    Glad they will ditch Norway and clean out those lift towers on that little fall line.

    Ive never seen it run, but I only ride there on the bookends of the season.
    Terje was right.

    "We're all kooks to somebody else." -Shelby Menzel

Similar Threads

  1. ABasin - Zuma Bowl
    By GFP in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 01-27-2008, 03:13 PM
  2. Boyne USA Resorts Announces Expansion: Crystal Group to buy Loon & Snoqualmie
    By Young Yeezy in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 10-31-2007, 08:52 PM
  3. Crested Butte Expansion?
    By montanaskier in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-21-2007, 12:20 AM
  4. Crested Butte Expansion, revamp.
    By CaddyDaddy77 in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-18-2004, 12:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •