• Register
  • Help

Notices

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. 11-04-2006, 09:00 PM #1
    Telephil
    Telephil is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,388

    Atomic Sugar Daddy vs. Rossi B-Squad

    Deciding to get back into the world of alpining and out of tele-ing, at least in resort. Have had my mind set on sugar daddy's for some time and am still trying to find some 183's, not an easy task. However, I'm also considering the B Squad in a 184. Has anyone skied both of them? I just want something big and fast, but also something I can turn. WWMD?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 11-04-2006, 09:29 PM #2
    FigureEleven's Avatar
    FigureEleven
    FigureEleven is offline My guts have superbrains
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Snowmasspen
    Posts
    1,236
    Pre pubescent boy ski vs. man ski...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 11-04-2006, 10:45 PM #3
    skimasterflex's Avatar
    skimasterflex
    skimasterflex is offline Certified Fresh
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oaksterdam
    Posts
    1,413
    Sugar Daddy= turn good
    B Squad= not turn so good
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 11-05-2006, 12:17 AM #4
    bossass's Avatar
    bossass
    bossass is offline Calmer than you are.
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Oh are.
    Posts
    4,260
    Quote Originally Posted by FigureEleven View Post
    Pre pubescent boy ski vs. man ski...
    Word........
    ROBOTS ARE EATING MY FACE.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 11-05-2006, 12:48 AM #5
    dk_alaskan's Avatar
    dk_alaskan
    dk_alaskan is offline Longboard Rider
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In Anchortown looking to get my career on track
    Posts
    4,797
    b squad=man ski
    sugar daddy=baby boy ski.

    b squads are BURLY!!!! If you are a lightweight skier, DON'T buy them, they are a HARD charging heavy wide board that is stable in everything, but NOT an all around mountain ski, they are TOO much of a ski for ski to be mainly used as an inbounds ski. the sugar daddy's are going to be a much better all around inbounds ski AND much lighter. I have skied the 189 b squads and they RIP, but i am 6'3, 225 and a like big high speed long gs style turns. Squads don't like lots of tight turns and are not that forgiving.
    Our world is full of surrender at the first sign of adversity, do not give up when the challenge meets you, meet the challenge. Through perseverance comes the rewards, the rewards that make life so enjoyable.

    Seize the day, trusting little in the future.

    if you want something, go after it. if you want to screw someone over, look DEEP in your heart and realize Karma is a bitch

    http://arcticcycles.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 11-05-2006, 04:07 AM #6
    dirtybryan's Avatar
    dirtybryan
    dirtybryan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NY / BC
    Posts
    1,071
    The 189s and 184s are two different animals in both shape and flex. 184s are still burl though.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Atomic Sugar Daddy vs. Line Prophet 100?
    By dmo in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-24-2007, 02:05 PM
  2. FS: New 193cm Pimp Edition Atomic Sugar Daddy Skis
    By Yossarian in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-16-2006, 05:18 PM
  3. PSA: Atomic Tele Daddy (aka Sugar Daddy) $144, size 153 and 163 only
    By El Chupacabra in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-10-2006, 06:58 PM
  4. FS: 183 Atomic Sugar Daddy
    By TankShine in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-05-2004, 11:54 AM
  5. Side view of Atomic Sugar Daddy
    By Below Zero in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-27-2004, 09:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules