Results 26 to 30 of 30
Thread: Skis to replace G4's
10-08-2005, 05:58 AM #26Originally Posted by shmerham
Honestly I was REALLY surprised at the stiffness of the PE's compared to the Karmas, the karmas were still pretty stiff but were a much rounder and softer overall. The shop rat said that between the Karma and the PE the K2 was MORE ski and needed a lot of skier imput then the Karma.For sure, you have to be lost to find a place that can't be found, elseways everyone would know where it was
10-08-2005, 10:08 AM #27
Soft tail = no grip on the ice. That's the downfall of the PE's IMO."Don't tease me about my hobbies, I don't tease you about being an asshole"
10-08-2005, 11:24 AM #28
Get the 185 Karma's. Soooooo much more ski than the PE. Super quick, bomber on hardpack, float on big days. The '85s were my only ski last year in CO, and they never let me down. I also repeatedly thought about how this would be a great east coast "fattie." I have skied the PE's and the B3's on the right coast and both chatter on hardpack. I just cannot see this being the case with the Karmas - they feel like a GS ski, but seem to morph into a freeride ski when you need them to. Heavy for a twin, though.Chocolate? This is doodoo, BABY!
10-12-2005, 09:58 PM #29Originally Posted by Buster Highmen
werd for sure
01-26-2006, 01:25 AM #30Originally Posted by Highway Star