Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,025

    DIY boot CASTing

    Has anyone tried putting tech toe inserts into their own boots? I’m getting cast curious, well, probably more like I’m bored, and feel like it would be pretty easy to do. It wouldn’t be through the shop for obvious liability concerns.

    I’ve seen many boots done by CAST and honestly, it looks pretty sloppy. Of course they have their unique CAST tech fitting but I have a collection that I have removed from old boots that offer plenty of ways of securing them. Tools are not an issue either.

    So, has anyone tried this before and learned any lessons?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenBC View Post
    Has anyone tried putting tech toe inserts into their own boots? I’m getting cast curious, well, probably more like I’m bored, and feel like it would be pretty easy to do. It wouldn’t be through the shop for obvious liability concerns.

    I’ve seen many boots done by CAST and honestly, it looks pretty sloppy. Of course they have their unique CAST tech fitting but I have a collection that I have removed from old boots that offer plenty of ways of securing them. Tools are not an issue either.

    So, has anyone tried this before and learned any lessons?
    someone recently posted a horror story of how cast mangled up their insert job.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Squamish, BC
    Posts
    899
    they sent me these instructions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgMDtDY6AAk
    I have not done it.
    I may send them my Shadows over the summer, or just DIY with a dremmel and some patience.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    544
    Id probably be fine with this for something like shifts, where you only use the pins for the way up.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,121
    from watching that vid I think you want a table router or at least router & make a jig for the job

    I seem to remember CAST wants 200$ to do a boot the customer supplies ?
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,199
    Quote Originally Posted by KillerMonkey View Post
    Id probably be fine with this for something like shifts, where you only use the pins for the way up.
    This would be fine for when the skins are on. There is no fucking way I would ski on a home made tech toe insert. It's not worth it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,025
    $300 for cast to do it I believe.

    These jobs should definitely only be used for the up. Don’t ski it.

    I guess I’m curious if people have done it with reclaimed tech inserts or if they bought the cast ones for $100.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,121
    I remember reading about somebody who had retro fitted front & back tech fittings and posted here on TGR which could probably be found with a search

    I agree you wana use cast or any retro fitted tech toe for the the up only

    if you reuse a fitting try and use a real dynafit toe fitting
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bellevue
    Posts
    7,449
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenBC View Post
    $300 for cast to do it I believe.

    These jobs should definitely only be used for the up. Don’t ski it.

    I guess I’m curious if people have done it with reclaimed tech inserts or if they bought the cast ones for $100.
    It seems to me that the screws through the insert might be important. There are a couple versions of the dynafit inserts that I've seen but I think all are molded into the boot and smaller than the Cast one.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,025
    I’d be inclined to T nut them. There are definitely differences in quality of inserts but I don’t think that would be a real concern. More so, the hole layout. I would epoxy.

    left is Tecnica, right is Dalbello. The tecnica one seems cheap. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	98 
Size:	1.49 MB 
ID:	490314

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,025
    I’d be inclined to T nut them. There are definitely differences in quality of inserts but I don’t think that would be a real concern. More so, the hole layout. I would epoxy.

    Top is Tecnica, bottom is Dalbello. The tecnica one seems cheap. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	98 
Size:	1.49 MB 
ID:	490314

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    13,956
    I've had a couple of boots converted by cast. It seems to me like the complicated part would be the new sole that goes under the tech fitting. Cast mills the boot, installs the tech fitting, and then installs a gripwalk sole (on both the toe and heel). I can more or less get how the milling and tech installation could be done at home, but is the replacement sole something that's attainable?

    Edit - looking around, it appears there are plenty of generic-ish replacement soles for various boots, so I guess that's probably not too big of a deal.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,121
    the distance between pin holes also looks different so i would measure & compare to a real dynafit or Scarpa toe fitting cuz scarpa also uses real dynafit hardware and intuition liners ... unfortunaley scarpas don't fit me

    Its been a long time but remembering the salomon debacle their toe fitting did not have that bar connecting the pin sockets (at least these 2 have it) and so depended on the metal of the plate which had the huge holes so it just folded like a cheap tent, I remember looking at a pict and wondering who designed it ... maybe the kid in the mail room

    the fitting on the right looks more skookum like they paid an engineer
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,025
    Size difference is from wide angle lens. Widths are exactly the same.

    The Salomon debacle was from skiing and not touring. Skiing needs a much stronger interface of course.

    Replacement soles are easy. You can make most soles work on most boots if you have a router for din height.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,697
    Just a question to the industry peeps... how are swappable tech/din/GW soles not a thing yet?

    Maybe it's a production/cost variable that just doesn't make sense from a manufacturer's perspective.

    K2 adding tech toes to their no-walk-mode Recon 140 is a step in the right direction, though.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,799
    Quote Originally Posted by gaijin View Post
    Just a question to the industry peeps... how are swappable tech/din/GW soles not a thing yet?

    Maybe it's a production/cost variable that just doesn't make sense from a manufacturer's perspective.

    K2 adding tech toes to their no-walk-mode Recon 140 is a step in the right direction, though.
    The OG cochise boots had swappable sole blocks. They skied, diplomatically put, like crap.

    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,025
    If the tech fittings are in the removable soles, they ski like shit. They also need the big cumbersome toes like the Cochise which means it’s the entire toe lug and not just a thing you screw on the bottom.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,755
    It seems like the type of thing that you would learn a lot from a couple of test runs. Do you have extra fittings, shells and soles to practice on?
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Eluder View Post
    It seems like the type of thing that you would learn a lot from a couple of test runs. Do you have extra fittings, shells and soles to practice on?
    Barry Allison at evo Village Sports in Whistler does them with CAST's blessing - he showed me a couple he'd done, says it takes a couple tries to get it right.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,121
    [QUOTE,=GoldenBC;7048153]Size difference is from wide angle lens. Widths are exactly the same.

    The Salomon debacle was from skiing and not touring. Skiing needs a much stronger interface of course.
    .[/QUOTE]

    I think it was after the salomon thing somebody was checking fittings, I think that BD had a different spacing on the toe bar between sockets, garmont as it became scott had some had bad sockets
    the 2 toe bars in the pict definatley look different which is why i asked
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    5,022
    The original black diamond crossover boots had both soles, skied ok.
    I rip the groomed on tele gear

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,121
    I think that ^^ was the Factor (green/ green color) some Not many swapable AT/ DIN soles were tech friendly, apparently BD's with fixed tech fittings were a slightly different spec, none of the garmont AT swapable soles were tech friendly

    a buddy bought the Cosmo with bad pin sockets and I remember seeing/ feeling it first hand

    Dynafit & Scarpa used real Dynafit fittings

    you would think all the fittings would be the same cuz all they needed to do is copy a dynafit but someone nerded out on this stuff and found out not so

    its all stuff i read at least 10 yrs ago but maybe its buried in wildsnow ?
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    you would think all the fittings would be the same cuz all they needed to do is copy a dynafit but someone nerded out on this stuff and found out not so
    Actually people bought these boots and found out the hard way they didn't work. We had some problems with La Sportiva as well. Now there is an ISO spec for the fittings (Dynafit's).

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kootenays
    Posts
    1,497
    Salomon alpine boots had sole blocks that could be swapped with the tech fitting ones from their touring line. Too bad the shells would crack in less than a season (happened to me twice).

    Kind of puzzled with the growth of tech touring binders like the CAST, Marker, Solly etc, that the few proper alpine boots with tech fittings seem to have disappeared from the market. Threads like these show there is obviously some demand for them... Love my Dalbellos, wish I had bought a backup pair when they went out of production.
    Last edited by snoboy; 03-13-2024 at 11:27 PM.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Squamish, BC
    Posts
    899
    give it a couple years and I bet we'll see a few more.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •