Page 66 of 71 FirstFirst ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 LastLast
Results 1,626 to 1,650 of 1766
  1. #1626
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,614

    Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

    Great review and purple pivots look good.

    I’ve got my BC ST 187s awaiting me when I get home. What binding is my biggest debate right now…

  2. #1627
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Ellensburg
    Posts
    1,246
    Quote Originally Posted by ASmileyFace View Post
    Great review and purple pivots look good.

    I’ve got my BC ST 187s awaiting me when I get home. What binding is my biggest debate right now…
    ATK Trofeo Plus on sale from Oliunid for $300. I was planning to order a pair of ST120s in the BC layup/shape and then talked myself into a pair of c132s, I think those will match up with my objectives better. Anyway, Oliunid has good deals on ATK and Trab bindings right now.

  3. #1628
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by GBB View Post
    Loving all the ST120 reviews. @Marshal or others with time on these, why should one opt for the R vs. FR? Where does the R shine against the FR and vice versa?
    R=More directional, tail support, better in chop/at speed.
    FR= MOAR pivot, MOAR drift, a touch less work.

    I think its really just a stability vs maneuverability choice, but I'll let others tell me if im wrong on this.

  4. #1629
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,334
    Quote Originally Posted by K1mJ0ngTr1ll View Post
    R=More directional, tail support, better in chop/at speed.
    FR= MOAR pivot, MOAR drift, a touch less work.

    I think its really just a stability vs maneuverability choice, but I'll let others tell me if im wrong on this.
    Agree. Both do each well and have overlap on the Venn Diagram, but to summarize:

    R = more of a smashy personality
    FR = more of a video-gamey ride

  5. #1630
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Exit, CO
    Posts
    760
    So, three rocker/camber profiles?

    FR = Fully rockered
    R = long low rocker
    FC = cambered?

    And the FC is not available on the swallowtails, just the FR and R in the freeride construction. And most anything with the BC construction has the R profile? I feel like I need a graduate level course to get all this straight.
    The older I get, the faster I was.






    Punch it, Chewie.

    Damn he seems cool.

  6. #1631
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,334
    You just passed the test!
    With the exception that the BC reverse profile is more like a flat tailed FR rocker.

    I definitely like the modular approach, but also realize its a bit more convoluted that way too. Longer term, there will be 1 profile for each shape as the "mainline" offering, and do limited editions for the other stuff.

  7. #1632
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    541
    Anyone gotten on the R105 yet?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #1633
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,801
    Quote Originally Posted by bw_wp_hedonism View Post
    Anyone gotten on the R105 yet?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I believe, until the preorder ships in the fall, I have the only pair. I did a write-up over in the FL105 thread, but if it's something you feel I left out or forgot to address, just let me know.

    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

  9. #1634
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,614
    Gawd damn. Only got to fondle them for a sec before getting pulled away but as with my FR110s I’m incredibly impressed. Mine came out to 1792 and 1839 each. Not bad for a 120 underfoot 187 length ski.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1707349155.218282.jpg 
Views:	121 
Size:	1.06 MB 
ID:	485958

  10. #1635
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,334
    SWEET DUDE! Dying for real world feedback on the Swallowtails.

    I got a chance to get my BC Swallowtails dirty for the first time today. Couldn't have a bigger buzz.
    Last edited by Marshal Olson; 02-07-2024 at 07:05 PM.

  11. #1636
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    7,842
    Maybe this weekend, 5” forecast for Friday. Not the deep pow experience but maybe worthy? Scared of rocks though.

  12. #1637
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    673
    I skied my R120 comps pretty extensively the last few days in fantasy storm conditions and they are so dialed, thank you again. No tip dive, plenty of heft in a flat tailed 185cm package, easily manageable in higher density and in tighter spaces, but unbelievable in blower, chop and crud on edge. No hangups.

  13. #1638
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    6,929
    Love that topsheet!

    I tried to get Marshal to press my R87 in pink ala the R120.

  14. #1639
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    640
    Got out on the R120 tonight at Brighton. Jesus Christ these things wanna go fast. Can’t wait to get them out on a pow day. I have a feeling will be skiing chop at speeds not yet seen in my skiing career (Still probably not that fast).
    Really really please with the R 110/120 1-2 punch. Makes me want to try that FL105.

  15. #1640
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    37N 122W
    Posts
    626
    Quote Originally Posted by ASmileyFace View Post

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1707349155.218282.jpg 
Views:	121 
Size:	1.06 MB 
ID:	485958
    WHAT!? That top sheet is out of this world awesome.



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    "Kids today, all they talk about is big air. I say, stay on the mountain, that's where the action is. If you want big air, pull my finger." ~Smooth Johnson~

  16. #1641
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    346
    ^Nice Bry. Instant classics.

    Quote Originally Posted by K1mJ0ngTr1ll View Post
    Makes me want to try that FL105.
    They’re fuckin rad.
    Been making up quiver slots to fit em all in. Breakfast laps, Thursday, rest day laps, Shrooms anonymous, Boxing Day. A ski for every occasion.

  17. #1642
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    123
    Taking my r120s out today! 6” overnight on 9” from the day before, should be good testing conditions

  18. #1643
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by Sylvan View Post
    ^Nice Bry. Instant classics.



    They’re fuckin rad.
    Been making up quiver slots to fit em all in. Breakfast laps, Thursday, rest day laps, Shrooms anonymous, Boxing Day. A ski for every occasion.
    The Boxing Day quiver slot got me lolol

  19. #1644
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    128
    ^ You want the FL105. Trust me, you'll find yourself making up reasons to ski them.

  20. #1645
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    1,995
    Was somebody on here going to pass along a 186 pair of FL105’s?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  21. #1646
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by bry View Post
    I skied my R120 comps pretty extensively the last few days in fantasy storm conditions and they are so dialed, thank you again. No tip dive, plenty of heft in a flat tailed 185cm package, easily manageable in higher density and in tighter spaces, but unbelievable in blower, chop and crud on edge. No hangups.
    Great to see the Comp R120's getting some hype. I skied mine this last Tahoe storm cycle and would with everything @bry says here.

  22. #1647
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    22
    Anyone able to compare the FR120ST to the Moment Wildcat? The latter is basically one of my favorite skis (both regular, and tour version) but my only complaint is I do get some tip dive in deep snow (in the “190” length, which is probably comparable to the 187 FR120). Curious if this ski would fix that shortcoming while otherwise skiing similarly (not sure how much the full rocker would change that)

  23. #1648
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    37N 122W
    Posts
    626
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2490.jpg 
Views:	126 
Size:	1.87 MB 
ID:	486065

    Woop! Woop!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    "Kids today, all they talk about is big air. I say, stay on the mountain, that's where the action is. If you want big air, pull my finger." ~Smooth Johnson~

  24. #1649
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by asmvolatile View Post
    Anyone able to compare the FR120ST to the Moment Wildcat? The latter is basically one of my favorite skis (both regular, and tour version) but my only complaint is I do get some tip dive in deep snow (in the “190” length, which is probably comparable to the 187 FR120). Curious if this ski would fix that shortcoming while otherwise skiing similarly (not sure how much the full rocker would change that)
    I think the tip dive that folks get on the wildcat comes from the stiffer flex and the -5.65 mount. The shovels done flex enough to have them plane up but makes them really great in chop. The Chipotle Banana has the same issue in my Opinion. Both me R and FR 120 seem to float better than the Kitty. My FR is -7.5 and my R is -8.5. Both of them flex softer than the Wildcat but make up the suspension in their weight 2280g vs 2450g. The R has just as much if not a touch more stability in chop than the Kitty. The FR maybe a touch less stability than the Cat but it’s stupid easy to drift and pivots easier. So yes I think it would solve your issue lol.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #1650
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    3,487
    187 BC120 next to a 192FR110

    1810 & 1812g flat measured weights

    XL pomoca skins work just fine with the modded tail attachments Marshal kindly gave me


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4457.jpg 
Views:	95 
Size:	693.0 KB 
ID:	486071

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4458.jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	712.7 KB 
ID:	486070

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4459.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	494.0 KB 
ID:	486060

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4460.jpg 
Views:	87 
Size:	467.3 KB 
ID:	486062

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •