Page 9 of 16 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 380
  1. #201
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    seatown
    Posts
    4,123
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    yes, i got that part. I was wondering about some specifics.
    i’ve been outta the car game a few years, but would recommend legacygt.com/forums

    just after college i convinced a friend (22 y/o navy heli pilot) to fly from pensacola to NY to buy this beast. he told me at one point the next garage it will live in will be mine. we’ll see about that.

    https://legacygt.com/forums/showthre...bb-194295.html

  2. #202
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,017
    Nomad you could try a 6 cyl (3.6L) Outback if you need more room than the smaller wagons... way more zip than a T4R even the V8 and smoother on the highway.

    If you want a T4R that handles the highway way better than your 3rd gen, the 5th gen ('10-curent) SR5 do pretty well, but the Lims are better with XREAS crosslinked suspension to decrease body roll (4th gen (03-09) Sport also had this). 5th gen Limiteds also have full time "AWD" with a lockable center (all 4th gens had this, makes them amazing in snow and maneuverable in parking lots). But Limiteds are $$$. You could get a 4th or 5th gen SR5 and upgrade the suspension for less.

    We replaced a 4th gen T4R Sport with a used 3.6L Outback because a Limited T4R was going to cost 40% more than the top trim subie and 1 T4R is enough for us.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  3. #203
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    1,998
    Quote Originally Posted by Dromond View Post

    Regardless, if you want a legit winter tire that handles everyday driving well, the xi3 appears to me a great choice.
    I run the xi3 on my turbo forester and feel the same way. While i believe it gives up a bit of deep snow performance to blizzak and the nokian Hakka, it drives well in all conditions and has lasted many many miles while retaining good grip in icy snowy conditions.

    Next tire will be either a nokian or another set of Michelin xi3.

  4. #204
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,017
    Those Michy Xi3s come with way less tread than a Blizzak DMV2. Just looked and the same size comes with 10.5/32" tread depth while the Blizzak comes with 13/32". Since I'm only driving to about 5.5/32 before replacement on a snow, that means I've got 5/32 of consumable tread on the Xi3 vs 7.5/32" on the DMV2,

    Blizzak DMV2 has 50% more usable tread than a Micheline Xi3!
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  5. #205
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    7,287
    I feel like this thread is like “is the BG right for me” thread. I could be wrong but it is TGR. Just sayin
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    So after 15 years we finally made it to Utah.....


    Thanks BCSAR and POWMOW Ski Patrol for rescues

    8, 17, 13, 18, 16, 18, 20, 19, 16, 24, 32, 35

    2021/2022 (13/15)

  6. #206
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    7,842
    It amazes me how much time we can spend talking about the same tires around here. This is what, the 3rd or 4th all-season vs. winter tire thread?

  7. #207
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,684
    My wife commutes I70 over Vail pass a shitload. Drives an 3.6L Outback with Nokians, and she drives fast and well. The other day she creamed a post in the parking garage at work. Moral of the story, great tires and power, and AWD can only get you so far in this world. You are still gonna wreck. Guy at the body shop said he loves Subarus, because they are easy to work on and they get a ton of em.

  8. #208
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Inside the Circle
    Posts
    4,191
    Tons of empirical data compiled by disinterested parties suggests otherwise.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #209
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,198
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    The 4 runner and LX350 (same vehicle, LX350 is a better buy on the used market) come with decent V8s, they won’t handle like a WRX but can wheel and can get out of their own way. I’m assuming you have an older 4 runner?
    The 4Runner and GX are very similar. There is no such vehicle as a LX350 from Toyota or Lexus. The Lexus LX is the fancy Land Cruiser, and there was a LX450 (straight six, not in any 4Runner), a LX470 (V8, available in 4th gen 4Runner), and a LX570 (V8, newer).

    The Highlander is the fancy version of the RX, which did come as a RX350. Toyota did not put that 3.5 V6 in any 4Runner or GX, but it was available in the Highlander, RX, and even the RAV4.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  10. #210
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,947
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    5th gen Limiteds also have full time "AWD" with a lockable center (all 4th gens had this, makes them amazing in snow and maneuverable in parking lots).

    correct me if im wrong, but locking the center diff makes all 4 wheels spin at the same rate, meaning that turning tight radius' is no bueno. I get a shitton of grinding if i try and turn with my center diff locked on my 2004 4runner, but i also have never NEEDED it- only ever used it just to make sure it still kicks in.

  11. #211
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,017
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    correct me if im wrong, but locking the center diff makes all 4 wheels spin at the same rate, meaning that turning tight radius' is no bueno. I get a shitton of grinding if i try and turn with my center diff locked on my 2004 4runner, but i also have never NEEDED it- only ever used it just to make sure it still kicks in.
    A locked "center" (what is seen in 4WD)means that the front and rear drive axles must spin at the same rate, but since those connect to open diffs on their respective axles not all 4 wheels need spin at the same rate as you have seen if you've ever gotten a 4wd stuck. You can have 1 wheel spinning on each axle while one wheel on each axle doesn't move. However the two wheels that are spinning (at the highest rate) on each axle must move at the same speed which is the problem when cornering.

    So the part time 4wd in 4th Gen 4runner (yours) and full time awd in Limited 4th and 5th Gen 4runners does have the ability to lock and unlock the center while in "4wd". When not locked, it functions basically like AWD allowing different rotation rates (slip) between the front and rear drive axles allowing you to turn without grinding (which is tires breaking traction as forced by the locked differential) and poor turning radius. Being able to not have the center locked gives AWD an edge in traction on road in the snow over pure (locked diff) 4WD as in trucks (or all 5th Gen T4R except the Limited).

    Then you can lock for extra traction if crawling off road or stuck in the snow.

    It's the best of both worlds.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  12. #212
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    The 4Runner and GX are very similar. There is no such vehicle as a LX350 from Toyota or Lexus. The Lexus LX is the fancy Land Cruiser, and there was a LX450 (straight six, not in any 4Runner), a LX470 (V8, available in 4th gen 4Runner), and a LX570 (V8, newer).

    The Highlander is the fancy version of the RX, which did come as a RX350. Toyota did not put that 3.5 V6 in any 4Runner or GX, but it was available in the Highlander, RX, and even the RAV4.
    You are correct, GX470, not LX350 (really screwed that one up). The 4 runners hold their value way better than the GX so you can get more for your money. Things like leather, V8, the fancy hydraulic antisway system.

    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    correct me if im wrong, but locking the center diff makes all 4 wheels spin at the same rate, meaning that turning tight radius' is no bueno. I get a shitton of grinding if i try and turn with my center diff locked on my 2004 4runner, but i also have never NEEDED it- only ever used it just to make sure it still kicks in.
    It makes the front and rear drive shafts spin the same speed, not all 4 tires. Axle differentials allow the tires to turn different speeds unless you also have axle differential lockers, in which case they are all forced to turn the same speed. Locking the center diff will make it difficult to turn in high traction situations but it shouldn't grind, tires may skid a little and you'll feel some bucking but not grinding. The only time I notice it when driving on snow in my long ass 4 door long bed (it's more exaggerated on long wheel base vehicles) is in parking lots and occasionally on a tight right hand turn.
    Last edited by GPP33; 11-29-2018 at 12:46 PM.

  13. #213
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    The 4Runner and GX are very similar. There is no such vehicle as a LX350 from Toyota or Lexus.
    Pretty sure he was confusing the LX and GX, which was especially easy back when both the LX and GX were V8 powered and Land Cruiser based.

    Test drove one of those when new and found it a cramped ergonomic nightmare on par with my LR Discovery, albeit potentially more reliable by far. Bought a V8 Pathfinder instead, which was “fine”.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  14. #214
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Portland by way of Bozeman
    Posts
    4,279
    Quote Originally Posted by reckless toboggan View Post
    Yup.

    Keep a 4x4 manual SUV winter beater with upsized studded Hakkapeliittas and a ski box for those exact reasons.

    I don't understand people who buy $80,000 4x4 road princesses.
    So they can take the kids to soccer practice and sit in traffic. Duh

  15. #215
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    7,287
    ^^^. Drove my 05 manual turbo forester in snow and it’s great and paid off. I do love the MDX for comfort and reliability. I don’t understand the Audi and beemer soccer deal but it seems to be a status thing. The MDX handles really well in the snow with hakkas and their sh-awd. To each their own but my SUVs do not suck in the MTNS.
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    So after 15 years we finally made it to Utah.....


    Thanks BCSAR and POWMOW Ski Patrol for rescues

    8, 17, 13, 18, 16, 18, 20, 19, 16, 24, 32, 35

    2021/2022 (13/15)

  16. #216
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Portland by way of Bozeman
    Posts
    4,279
    Quote Originally Posted by Mallthus View Post
    Pretty sure he was confusing the LX and GX, which was especially easy back when both the LX and GX were V8 powered and Land Cruiser based.

    Test drove one of those when new and found it a cramped ergonomic nightmare on par with my LR Discovery, albeit potentially more reliable by far. Bought a V8 Pathfinder instead, which was “fine”.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Totally splitting hairs here; the GX and V8 4Runners are not Land Cruiser-based. They shared a similar drivetrain, including the 4.7 V8, but that was about it.

  17. #217
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig View Post
    Totally splitting hairs here; the GX and V8 4Runners are not Land Cruiser-based. They shared a similar drivetrain, including the 4.7 V8, but that was about it.
    The GX and 4Runner shared their platform and drivetrain with the Land Cruiser Prado. Toyota calls the Prado a Land Cruiser. I don’t feel like I’m in a position to argue with the people who make the thing.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  18. #218
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by whyturn View Post
    ^^^. Drove my 05 manual turbo forester in snow and it’s great and paid off. I do love the MDX for comfort and reliability. I don’t understand the Audi and beemer soccer deal but it seems to be a status thing. The MDX handles really well in the snow with hakkas and their sh-awd. To each their own but my SUVs do not suck in the MTNS.
    Because for every SUV on proper winter tires you see in the snow, there’s 25 (or more) that have never left Orange County, California (or Houston, Miami, Phoenix, etc).


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  19. #219
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Mallthus View Post
    The GX and 4Runner shared their platform and drivetrain with the Land Cruiser Prado. Toyota calls the Prado a Land Cruiser. I don’t feel like I’m in a position to argue with the people who make the thing.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Toyota calls two completely different platforms "Land Cruisers" depending on what country you are in. Since we're talking about vehicles in the US GX=4runner, LX=Land Cruiser, we don't get Prados. Not sure if that holds for current land cruisers since the land cruiser = sequoia, does that also = LX570?

  20. #220
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by GPP33 View Post
    Toyota calls two completely different platforms "Land Cruisers" depending on what country you are in. Since we're talking about vehicles in the US GX=4runner, LX=Land Cruiser, we don't get Prados. Not sure if that holds for current land cruisers since the land cruiser = sequoia, does that also = LX570?
    And, of course, the Sequoia is really wholly unrelated to the Land Cruiser lineup, being the based on the Tundra platform, although it shares an engine family (3UR) with the Land Cruiser and LX.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  21. #221
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    656
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    Nomad you could try a 6 cyl (3.6L) Outback if you need more room than the smaller wagons... way more zip than a T4R even the V8 and smoother on the highway.

    If you want a T4R that handles the highway way better than your 3rd gen, the 5th gen ('10-curent) SR5 do pretty well, but the Lims are better with XREAS crosslinked suspension to decrease body roll (4th gen (03-09) Sport also had this). 5th gen Limiteds also have full time "AWD" with a lockable center (all 4th gens had this, makes them amazing in snow and maneuverable in parking lots). But Limiteds are $$$. You could get a 4th or 5th gen SR5 and upgrade the suspension for less.

    We replaced a 4th gen T4R Sport with a used 3.6L Outback because a Limited T4R was going to cost 40% more than the top trim subie and 1 T4R is enough for us.

    The 5th gens are much better, that’s true, I’ve driven one for a while. But they are WAY more expensive, get worse MPG, and are still dogs on the highway. Most likely I’ll get a WRX or XT as a daily and keep the T4R for the really gnarly snow days and summer off-roading. I only paid $3k for it, and with the manual and locker the fucker is unstoppable in adverse conditions. Plus it’s really cozy to sleep in with the back seats out. Plus I still often need a truck.

  22. #222
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,947
    Quote Originally Posted by whyturn View Post
    ^^^. Drove my 05 manual turbo forester in snow and it’s great and paid off. I do love the MDX for comfort and reliability. I don’t understand the Audi and beemer soccer deal but it seems to be a status thing. The MDX handles really well in the snow with hakkas and their sh-awd. To each their own but my SUVs do not suck in the MTNS.
    The point was more a comment on the perceived unnecessary expense of a luxury SUV, than their capability in the mtns. Most newer SUVs kill it in the snow with decent tires. I use my older 4runner like i use a pair of rock skis- i drive in questionable conditions, on questionable roads, and do so because i have no qualms about adding another ding or scratch to it. I would think twice about driving up that overgrown logging road, or into the teeth of a pass-closing winter storm, or allowing 3 muddy people and a muddy dog to pile in for another shuttle lap on a wet fall day if a large part of my cars value was in the cosmetics. I would end up passing on some of those fun adventures, or it would be added stress and time involved. Also, im lucky and find the 4runner extremely comfortable, and ive never had a newer car so maybe i dont fully realize what im missing haha.

    But, if a person has enough money to not care about dinging up, and being rough on a $50k+ car/truck, then more power to em. I certainly don't, and if i did, i would probably just keep the beater 4wd and use the excess on an even better city driver. But, like you said, to each their own.

  23. #223
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,947
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    Plus it’s really cozy to sleep in with the back seats out.
    Huge bonus. Im 6'4" and with the front seats all the way up i can stretch out full length (not diagonal) in the back. I used to sleep very comfortably in the back most weekends when i was living in SF and skied at kirkwood.

  24. #224
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Moose, Iowa
    Posts
    7,952
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    The 5th gens are much better, that’s true, I’ve driven one for a while. But they are WAY more expensive, get worse MPG, and are still dogs on the highway. Most likely I’ll get a WRX or XT as a daily and keep the T4R for the really gnarly snow days and summer off-roading. I only paid $3k for it, and with the manual and locker the fucker is unstoppable in adverse conditions. Plus it’s really cozy to sleep in with the back seats out. Plus I still often need a truck.
    That is what we did/have done with our 2003 Gen 4. New gen 5's are SO much money. Bought my Alltrack for 1/2 price a Gen 5 spec the way I would want. Our 4R already has OME lift and Bilsteins and the awd center diff and runs perfect for towing boats and family ski trips out west or off roading to hiking trails in the San Juans. Maybe someday I put an air locker in the rear end but it would only make things easier...not really needed for the tame stuff we conquer. Preserve and enjoy without too much worry and burn up our 3 little shit box wagons instead while saving a little fuel along the way.

  25. #225
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,593
    Name:  giphy.gif
Views: 306
Size:  366.0 KB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •