Results 1 to 25 of 32
-
01-20-2017, 09:53 PM #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- The North Country
- Posts
- 3,674
Is the North East Screwed for Skiing, Boarding and Naked Sub-freezing Streaking?
Parts of the USA are warming faster than others, with the North East well in the lead:
This type of question is answered in a very recent study published by scientists from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. The team, which includes Dr. Raymond Bradley and researcher Dr. Ambarish Karmalkar looked specifically at the Northeastern United States. They found that this area will warm much more rapidly than the globe as a whole. In fact, it will warm faster than any other United States region. The authors expect the Northeast US will warm 50% faster than the planet as a whole. They also find that the United States will reach a 2 degree Celsius warming 10–20 years before the globe as a whole.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/par...ole-globe.html
One owner of a really nice ski shop told me he thought that skiing was a dying sport in the southern North East.
Thoughts?
-
01-20-2017, 09:58 PM #2
Is the North East Screwed for Skiing, Boarding and Naked Sub-freezing Streaking?
That would not surprise me. Also, non-skier winter haters across that part of the country will continue to be excited when it's 75° in January, and that doesn't help driving home the importance of dealing with climate weirding.
-
01-20-2017, 10:00 PM #3
Thanks for posting that. Looks like a possible dump next week.
-
01-21-2017, 06:45 AM #4Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- The North Country
- Posts
- 3,674
-
01-21-2017, 07:27 AM #5Silent....but shredly.
-
01-21-2017, 07:27 AM #6
-
01-21-2017, 08:31 AM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 365
Seems to be another ski season not much better than last year in the northeast, and last year was terrible. Hopefully this won't be a trend. Idiots around here lecture me on my need to ski anything and very often to improve as a skier, but once the finances of skiing semi locally 4 times in shit conditions matches a 4 day trip out to Utah, timed around when they get snow, it's hard to not do the switch to a trip to Utah every 4 to 6 weeks instead of skiing mediocrity in the northeast 3 or 4 weekends out of 6.
-
01-21-2017, 08:33 AM #8
Yep. NJ used to have ski areas around the whole state, even in south Jersey. I taught at Bell Mountain until nobody could run it because you could not keep snow on it. When the industry started it was possible to run an area with natural, now that's not even a dream on the best years.
-
01-21-2017, 09:46 AM #9
-
01-21-2017, 10:13 AM #10
Wait, what? All over the state? SOUTH JERSEY? Do you realize that south Jersey is basically, flat? Methinks you are exaggerating a tad.
Californians were talking about the end of the world recently. Now look what happened. Droughts come, droughts go. Although this is not going to help the economic situation up in Vermont. Some businesses that survived last year may not survive two or three in a row, especially in a world of cheap air fares. I think the average skier day count is about 12, but correct me if I'm wrong, if you have access to the latest marketing numbers. That's two quick trips to Denver or SLC from most airports in the northeast.
-
01-21-2017, 10:16 AM #11
-
01-21-2017, 10:18 AM #12
Direct, dude, non stop. SLC trips can accommodate skiing on both travel days.
-
01-21-2017, 10:52 AM #13
Nope, back before the internet I had a paper map that showed ski areas on it. There were near a dozen in NJ. After I got stranded here, I tried to find many of them. There was still a sign along the road for Ski Mtn, near Berlin NJ. Look I found a map that shows it. I even found a FB page dedicated to it.
-
01-21-2017, 11:04 AM #14ski paintingshttp://michael-cuozzo.fineartamerica.com" horror has a face; you must make a friend of horror...horror and moral terror.. are your friends...if not, they are enemies to be feared...the horror"....col Kurtz
-
01-21-2017, 11:21 AM #15
I think this is as economic as it is about climate. Back in the day a strong middle class had leisure money and time to enjoy things like boating and skiing. Now, most have to make a deliberate effort to sacrifice economic security to enjoy the things that make life worth living.
-
01-21-2017, 11:33 AM #16
-
01-21-2017, 12:44 PM #17
-
01-21-2017, 05:34 PM #18
-
01-21-2017, 05:54 PM #19Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- The North Country
- Posts
- 3,674
-
01-21-2017, 07:34 PM #20
Then explain weekend crowds in Colorado and California.
-
01-21-2017, 07:52 PM #21
Since "back in the day" the population has doubled. But, you knew that, of course. I'm sure you can infer the rest cuz ur so smrt.
-
01-21-2017, 08:21 PM #22
The two are related. You can run a local ski hill for cheap with natural snow. You can't when you need snowmaking. This is basic Econ 301. Higher fixed costs = fewer firms each producing more units per firm (skier days). And the total industry produces fewer units (skier days) than it would absent the higher fixed costs.
If there were still 30 ski areas offering $30 lift tickets in NJ and PA, there would be much less of a flood of gapers to the Rockies. But you can't run a mom and pop hill in the mid Atlantic any more and the last ones standing in southern NE are hurting.
Check out the New England Lost Ski Area Project web site for a trip down memory lane and/or a vision of what is already gone.
-
01-21-2017, 10:11 PM #23
To be fair, a lot of those areas had pretty cheap lifts, too. Like, a rope tow or crude poma. Now, of course, everyone wants a chair, and a fast chair, at that.
-
01-22-2017, 12:31 AM #24
-
01-22-2017, 05:42 PM #25
Bookmarks