Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 62
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,410
    If you want to test how a pair of glasses handles fog, wear them while climbing trails in redwood forests at night. Humid! I am currently using 3M clear cheapo glasses with "anti fog caotings," and guess what ... they fog! I've found Uvex Genesis series to vent a little better.

    But really, you don't want a pair of glasses that vents *too well* because that also means dust in your eyes from the dude in front of you.

    For daytime riding I've been loving these guys:
    http://www.fullsource.com/uvex-ignite-safety-glasses/

    Lightweight, cheap, adjustable temples, spring loaded hinges. Indoor/Outdoor mirror lenses still let you see decently in broken shadows in the woods/trees but are dark enough for exposed areas. I use the Silver mirror for brighter light conditions. They don't fog during the day but I drip sweat all over them and wipe with my jersey before every downhill. Never tried clear lenses at night.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    5,785
    +3 for safety glasses. I run Uvex Astrospec's. Under $9. They don't fog any worse than your $200 glasses and are ANSI Z87 certified for protecting your eyes....

    Get them with the red white and blue Patriot frame and the indoor/outdoor mid gray lens.
    Name:  UVEX-S2731C.jpg
Views: 404
Size:  56.1 KB
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,281
    A few of these cheap glasses recommended by you guys have no UVB protection. Some have UVA protection, but you need UVB according to this: http://www.allaboutvision.com/faq/sunglasses.htm

    -UVA has longer wavelengths and passes through glass easily; experts disagree about whether or not UVA damages the eyes.
    -UVB rays are the most dangerous, making sunglasses and sunscreen a must; they don't go through glass.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,729
    Safety glasses are awesome when it's overcast, though. Or for night riding with friends.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    SF & the Ho
    Posts
    9,425
    Quote Originally Posted by muted View Post
    A few of these cheap glasses recommended by you guys have no UVB protection. Some have UVA protection, but you need UVB according to this: http://www.allaboutvision.com/faq/sunglasses.htm

    -UVA has longer wavelengths and passes through glass easily; experts disagree about whether or not UVA damages the eyes.
    -UVB rays are the most dangerous, making sunglasses and sunscreen a must; they don't go through glass.
    People didn't even wear sunglasses until
    last century. As opposed to skin, which people have always protected one way or another. I'm more concerned w shadows and missing a turn than uv anything

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,106
    Quote Originally Posted by muted View Post
    A few of these cheap glasses recommended by you guys have no UVB protection..
    Which ones?

    Also contacts block uv.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    5,076
    These Edge ones protect UVB, A, and C. They come in clear, yellow, smoke, blue. 99% of my riding is in thick woods, so I've always used a yellow, but I'm liking the clear lately. It gets pretty dark with that canopy of leaves.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,281
    Quote Originally Posted by mcski View Post
    People didn't even wear sunglasses until
    last century. As opposed to skin, which people have always protected one way or another. I'm more concerned w shadows and missing a turn than uv anything
    Interesting logic, but hey it's your choice. And people didn't have sunscreen with UVB until 1980 btw.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,281
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post
    Which ones?

    Also contacts block uv.
    I think everyone mentioned, including mine.

    Do most or just some contacts block UV? I don't think they all do.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    18,006
    Quote Originally Posted by muted View Post
    A few of these cheap glasses recommended by you guys have no UVB protection. Some have UVA protection, but you need UVB according to this: http://www.allaboutvision.com/faq/sunglasses.htm

    -UVA has longer wavelengths and passes through glass easily; experts disagree about whether or not UVA damages the eyes.
    -UVB rays are the most dangerous, making sunglasses and sunscreen a must; they don't go through glass.
    It would seem that most people using them otherwise have to ditch their sunglasses completely on climbs. Lack of UV protection doesn't matter much in that context. Personally, I sweat like crazy and if it's over ~65* my shades come off on the up.

    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    +3 for safety glasses. I run Uvex Astrospec's. Under $9. They don't fog any worse than your $200 glasses and are ANSI Z87 certified for protecting your eyes....

    Get them with the red white and blue Patriot frame and the indoor/outdoor mid gray lens.
    Name:  UVEX-S2731C.jpg
Views: 404
Size:  56.1 KB
    Those are KIR as fuck. I should buy a pair for a buddy who normally rides in jorts and thrift store rayon shirts that he cuts the sleeves off of.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,281
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    It would seem that most people using them otherwise have to ditch their sunglasses completely on climbs. Lack of UV protection doesn't matter much in that context. Personally, I sweat like crazy and if it's over ~65* my shades come off on the up.
    I'm just being the forum dad wondering if people are aware of the lack of UVB protection in cheapo glasses. Dowatchagottado, sonny.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,106
    Well, from actually checking, all these cheap safety glasses mentioned appear to offer full uv protection.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,281
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post
    Well, from actually checking, all these cheap safety glasses mentioned appear to offer full uv protection.
    I just double checked, and they still don't, so feel free to post proof of Shralp and Nicks glasses, it may be buried but usually that's something the manufacturer wants people to know right away. My Smith and Wesson only has UVA protection, which is useless.

    The dewalts Kidwoo post does have full AVA/UVB protection. he's so smart!

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,106
    Uvex says all their lenses block all UV. (page 17, bottom right)

    The s&w are the only ones I wasn't sure about, but sites selling them claim 99% uv protection. I don't see how that could mean only "A" and not "B," they are just different ranges of wavelengths.
    Last edited by jamal; 08-19-2016 at 12:16 PM.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,281
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post
    Uvex says all their lenses block all UV. (page 17, bottom right)

    The s&w are the only ones I wasn't sure about, but sites selling them claim 99% uv protection. I don't see how that could mean only "A" and not "B," they are just different ranges of wavelengths.
    You are right about Uvex, i definitely didn't read that brochure. S+W is only A, according to the packaging. It is weird they don't offer both, a lot of people shoot outside.

    OK, enough UV talk. My fault.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    15,729
    I used the sweat buster on my ride this morning and it worked really well. Highly recommended! I had to to do some cutting of my helmet's padding so I still had the top and sides in there, but after that it all fit together nicely and it's easy to pop in and out. I'm kind of surprised some helmet maker hasn't bought the rights to the product so they could integrate them into their helmets.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,410
    Quote Originally Posted by jamal View Post
    Uvex says all their lenses block all UV. (page 17, bottom right)
    Holy crap, I had no idea that their brand is named after the concept of a lens that excludes all forms of ultraviolet!

    It says, "UV-EX = ultraviolet excluded"

    Filing that as my one new thing learned for today.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Southeast New York
    Posts
    11,827
    A bit pricey but the Shred Provocator No Weight Airflow is a great piece of riding eyewear. There are a bunch of different lenses available from nearly clear to too dark and they pop in/out in seconds. http://shredoptics.com/product/provo...photo/?cid=624

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,724
    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    +3 for safety glasses. I run Uvex Astrospec's. Under $9. They don't fog any worse than your $200 glasses and are ANSI Z87 certified for protecting your eyes....

    Get them with the red white and blue Patriot frame and the indoor/outdoor mid gray lens.
    Name:  UVEX-S2731C.jpg
Views: 404
Size:  56.1 KB
    Somewhere Rod Stewart is pooping his pants while looking around the inside of his Lincoln Mark iv for his shades. Think we've found them

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,501
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    15,724
    Oooohhh yaaaaa!

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,349
    I ride in a set of 10-year old Smith Gallegos sunglasses with prescription lenses. Removal is not an option, yet somehow I don't think I have as big a problem as you guys describe. Good coverage but no fogging, just the occasional sweat drip which is best avoided by keeping the eyebrows from getting saturated. These are much more evenly curved than the above stylin safety glasses, so no single big gaps (like at the corners on those Pit Vipers).

    Zoic shorts used to come with a lens rag sown into one pocket and I love that--always a clean cloth when needed!

    FWIW, 3M brochure says polycarbonate lenses block 99% of UVA/UVB, so I'd think most things meeting ANSI Z71 are good to go.
    Last edited by jono; 08-20-2016 at 09:13 PM.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,410
    Bump.

    Lately I've been digging the UVEX Hypershock series, as the earpiece is more comfy than the UVEX Ignite I used to ride.

    Clear for forest / night riding, and gray for mixed sunny/shady riding - both have the extreme antifog coating that works pretty dang well. They also make a brown lens with the same antifog coating but I haven't tried it. They also make sick mirror lens options but those don't have the extreme antifog coating so I won't bother, since I sweat a ton and ride when it's cold out.

    Durable as hell and $10 per pair on Amazon. Brown one is $7.




    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    tetons
    Posts
    8,515
    The smith forefront helmet has an amazing glasses holding system (basically upside down in the main open groove of the helmet) It works so amazingly well https://www.smithoptics.com/us/forefront
    And while not specifically eyewear rec- it helps solve the problem for me, so wanted to pass on.
    it's weird that smith doesn't market that feature more bc for me it is a huge helper that never existed prior. (maybe croakies would be the closest thing but constantly covered in salty sweat drip)
    the system also works pretty darn well with other glasses brands too that I have tried (ie free sunglasses you get from beer co's)
    Flicking them up on the helmet when I get too foggy hot- then easy access back to the eyes and fogging gone bc they got air flow
    skid luxury

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    8,387
    I just got more of these in for my friends. The vapor proof just does not fog at all. It's nuts. Everyone that has tried a pair wants another in a different flavor. ...and they're inexpensive

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •