Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 36 of 36
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    50 miles E of Paradise
    Posts
    15,607
    Quote Originally Posted by dewam View Post
    Occasionally when the skiing is good and nothing has been going wrong I forget that the wicked environment is still there, I am not seeing it due to my complacency. A good example was banging out good south facing lines on a early spring day, only to find that the line we skied an hour earlier has now slid, and even taken out the up track. Just a degree or two of temp, a degree or two of sun angle, and another year to forget about spring slides.

    Perceived lenient consequences can kill when we forget the basics. This was a failure of intuition, and basics, among a very experienced group. The incident was extensively rehashed, is rehashed every year when the sun becomes more powerful, and has been passed on to many "
    Now that right there was some awesome instant feedback you got to pass on.

    This kind of stuff happens a lot. An example - several years ago at Mt Hood Meadows, the AC crew fired some howitzer shells into upper Heather due to Avy concerns. No result.

    So they sent a couple of guys over to throw some hand charges and kick stuff. Again no result. So they opened the area and a hordes of powder locusts descended.

    That evening - after closing - the whole canyon slid fuckin Hudge.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    50 miles E of Paradise
    Posts
    15,607
    Question for the avy instructors - do you perform a field exercise where you start directing your class toward riskier lines/routes, and then see whether someone speaks up?

    I've never seen this in a class but seems like it would be a good drill, so long as you have the coachable moment - "what the fuck is wrong with you people? I'm leading you into what you should know is big shit and you say nothing!" - before Teh Suck happens.

  3. #28
    Hugh Conway Guest
    If decision making were such a black/white obvious process people wouldn't associate value with intuition would they?

    A bit like this gem from the paper
    The optimal conditions, under which intuition will be more accurate, include an environment that provides relatively consistent indicators as to its true nature. The second and perhaps more important aspect is whether the decision maker has had the opportunity to learn the meaning of these indicators.
    "if mountains weren't mountains and were regular and predictable, and if we humans were pretty good at analyzing everything with out some negative catalyst (eg an avalanche) it'd be really easy to generate good intuition on what they'd do"

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Closed Area
    Posts
    1,188
    Here's a little bibliography for people that are into the subject:

    Klein, Gary A. Sources of power: How people make decisions. MIT press, 1999.

    Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, 2011.

    Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan:: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility. Random House LLC, 2010.

    And a podcast series...

    http://youarenotsosmart.com/podcast/
    Last edited by covert; 11-15-2014 at 07:13 PM. Reason: 456789

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by telebobski View Post
    Now that right there was some awesome instant feedback you got to pass on.
    This kind of stuff happens a lot.
    Often times, luck is the thing that keeps you alive long enough to learn. Den

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    50 miles E of Paradise
    Posts
    15,607
    ^^^My Dad used to say "You started out life with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. Yer supposed to fill up the experience bag before the luck bag is empty. Don't be a dumbfuck".

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    5
    Interesting post !

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    1,880
    8 pages to say that the qualities of the learning environment determine the effectiveness of the automatic decision making processes. Duh. Rather than footnoting the obvious (standard academic practice), this could have been useful if it had explored the extent to which trained intuition can be more effective than the application of protocol, because of its inherent capacity to simultaneously evaluate multiple constantly changing variables. In my experience Zen Buddhism provides a useful intellectual framework for understanding how and why this can be applied to managing risk in the backcountry.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    JH/AK/Los Andes
    Posts
    2,678
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    8 pages to say that the qualities of the learning environment determine the effectiveness of the automatic decision making processes. Duh.
    How the view from up on your horse?
    "The idea wasnt for me, that I would be the only one that would ever do this. My idea was that everybody should be doing this. At the time nobody was, but this was something thats too much fun to pass up." -Briggs
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    Wear your climbing harness. Attach a big anodized locker to your belay loop so its in prime position to hit your nuts. Double russian Ti icescrews on your side loops positioned for maximal anal rape when you sit down. Then everyone will know your radness
    More stoke, less shit.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    10
    how to train and develop intuition? well if you are just going on knowledge then you just have to practice but thats not intuition, intuition is what psychics use so perhaps you can ask at a new age spiritual forum? they probably know better than tgr

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    66
    Seems there's a bit of a continuum in terms of environments being conducive versus not to developing intuition of the sort that's useful rather than dangerous. A fairly consistent and relatively benign environment sounds like some types of inbounds a/c work, for instance. Where decision making tools that override intuition become particularly useful includes things like highly variable environments with potentially severe consequences (including some types of inbounds environments, I don't mean to minimize the risks there). One thing I've taken to doing myself, for instance, is if I read a slide report, quickly calculating the ALP TRUTH score. It can be stark compared to a narrative where you can see intuitively why something felt safe.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •